Page 5 - Service Deck News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And this alternative has a way of accomplishing the same result of moving cyclists through the panhandle to the wiggle, without any of the Environmental Impacts that we see as jumping up in this plan. The congestion that will come from decreasing levels of service on intersections on oak street, from the unique structure of putting up plantares on oak street that will make it hazardous for cars, using their curb cuts and driveways to get in and out of their garages, et cetera. So all of the potential problems that are there, that have been categorically eliminated, just by wave of an assertion...

The wiggle. For those living north, coming down hayes street makes a lot of sense. Likewise to avoid going up paige street, that one block hill on paige, returning from the wiggle, they can go scott to hayes, and then three blocks west, and turn left again, and into the panhandle at baker. The reason i would propose that is you can see is visually obvious. This is at rush hour, looking down hayes street a block over, actually two blocks away traffic moving in that direction inundates the street at this hour. President chiu supervisor wiener has a question for you. Supervisor wiener welcome. So...

It here, is and this is an appeal under ceqa, its not an appeal on the merits of the project. And so i think there are times when appeals ceqa appeals come before us, and you sometimes arguments about the merits of the project get mixed in, and that may be because thats the only way for the item to come to us. And whether agree or disagree with it but in 1999 the voters gave the policy authority over these kinds of issues to the mta board of directors and took that authority away from the board of supervisors. So im hearing, both in the written submissions and also in what youre saying today, ...

Actually two blocks away traffic moving in that direction inundates the street at this hour. President chiu supervisor wiener has a question for you. Supervisor wiener welcome. So one of the things i think i sometimes struggle with in these appeals and im sort of seeing it here, is and this is an appeal under ceqa, its not an appeal on the merits of the project. And so i think there are times when appeals ceqa appeals come before us, and you sometimes arguments about the merits of the project get mixed in, and that may be because thats the only way for the item to come to us. And whether agree...

That traffic that teeme seemed e way to do this. Traffic engineers would never mix different substantially different speeds of vehicle traffic on the same piece of pavement. And thats what this plan does, thats faulty. So when you look at when you look at the eir for the bicycle plan, that was approved finally in 2009, this sentence jumped out at me, and that says, when you implement plans like this, its not just exclusively for one set of constituents or users. You have to look at the entire picture and present a balanced plan that addresses all the needs of all of the people of the city. And...