Page 2 - Set Precedent News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

President, juries don't set precedent. trialjudges or appeal precedent. trial judges or appeal judges. _ precedent. trialjudges or appeal judges, judges set precedent. when 'ury judges, judges set precedent. when jury comes — judges, judges set precedent. when jury comes to a decision, ifjury set precedent that every time they came _ set precedent that every time they came to _ set precedent that every time they came to a — set precedent that every time they came to a decision that in accused of was _ came to a decision that in accused of was not — came to a decision that in accused of w...

Leaders out partying or having a good time in their personal lives while also asking children to stay masked up while in schools. parents are seeing this inconsistency and it is challenging. there hasn't been a set precedent on what works and what this country should do moving forward. >> harris: you know, it's interesting to see the transparency from you and how necessary it is for democrats to listen to that. because it is about the lives of the children. if we put all the politics aside we're trying to find the right science. an example of what you are talking about. new orleans mayor was c...

Said, if that's what the court says, then we're going to follow what the court says. now, a lot of people said that they should have appealed. this is a majority republican body of supervisors, by the way. they're not democrats. they decided not to appeal. the threat might have been if they got to a higher court and the higher court ruled that the subpoenas were valid, that could have set precedent across this state for this to happen every election. so perhaps that's why they didn't appeal, but we -- they just wanted to go along with what the court said. >> interesting. jen, thanks again for ...

The reporter later posted that audio later when he was working for npr. no one has the full story beyond what was written in that book, and clearly they don't want it to come out. >> in this part they're also saying that -- talking about delays. they said two or three weeks there should be a delay in this. one would assume that means for the campaign this apparently happened two months before the campaign, but they're talking about delays. the timing, matt, is important here. >> it could be if they go down the campaign finance reform angle. i really hope they don't because i do think that ther...

One would assume that means for the campaign this apparently happened two months before the campaign, but they're talking about delays. the timing, matt, is important here. >> it could be if they go down the campaign finance reform angle, i really hope they don't because i do think that there's a slippery slope there and that this could open a -- set precedent. at what point can you pay hush money to your mistress? six months earlier, is that a campaign finance violation? but if it's a week before the election, then it suddenly is a campaign finance violation. so i don't know where that might ...