planning approval. so they now have a site permit which has been approved, but not issued, and we are here, i guess tonight, to deal with the penalty issue. the nine times penalty is required for work performed without permit per table 1-a-k of the 2010 san francisco building code. i sympathize with the fact that the owner was getting water in their house, and, you know, any of us would want to remedy that situation. my thoughts are that it would have been probably better had been would bei, and i, for glad to go out there and look at the situation, give them advice regarding water-proofing or what permits would be necessary. and it s really unfortunate to see this structure that was taken down. so i leave it in your hands for decision on the penalty. i m available for any questions. how old? 198096? that s what was mentioned on the notice of violation. and some of the pictures in the materials yeah, i see them. show or indicate that it s an old structure. oka
tonight, to deal with the penalty issue. the nine times penalty is required for work performed without permit per table 1-a-k of the 2010 san francisco building code. i sympathize with the fact that the owner was getting water in their house, and, you know, any of us would want to remedy that situation. my thoughts are that it would have been probably better had been would bei, and i, for glad to go out there and look at the situation, give them advice regarding water-proofing or what permits would be necessary. and it s really unfortunate to see this structure that was taken down. so i leave it in your hands for decision on the penalty. i m available for any questions. how old? 198096? that s what was mentioned on the notice of violation. and some of the pictures in the materials yeah, i see them. show or indicate that it s an old structure. okay. vice president fung: you ll get a chance for rebuttal after the department s. is there any public comment? ok
penalty issue. the nine times penalty is required for work rformed without permit per table 1-a-k of the 2010 san francisco building code. i sympathize with the fact that the owner was getting water in their house, and, you know, any of us would want to remedy that situation. my thoughts are that it would have been probably better had been would bei, and i, for glad to go out there and look at the situation, give them advice regarding water-proofing or what permits would be necessary. and it s really unfortunate to see this structure that was taken down. so i leave it in your hands for decision on the penalty. i m available for any questions. how old? 198096? that s what was mentioned on the notice of violation. and some of the pictures in the materials yeah, i see them. show or indicate that it s an old structure. okay. vice president fung: you ll get a chance for rebuttal after the department s. is there any public comment? okay. seeing none, then we can
in writing to mr. johnson and to the board that makes it clear what it is that what action actually has taken place, on what permit. and then mr. johnson, you have opportunity to submit additional briefing. i don t know if the board wants to set a page limit. leave it to the same 12 pages as usual? vice president fung: i think that s okay. by october 18, mr. johnson. and then the department will have until november 1 to submit any response documents. thank you. on that motion from commissioner lazarus to continue this matter to november 7, and again it s to allow time for the sfpd permit bureau to reissue its departmental action and clarify this departmental action, and with additional briefing allowed. on that motion, vice president fung, aye. commissioner hurtado is absent. this matter is continued to november 7. thank you. president hwang: we re going to take a short break (p) we re returning to the september 19, 2012 board meeting of board of appeals (8) appea
requires a building permit be obtained for the rebuild of the structure, with planning department approval. permit application 201207245594 was filed on july 24, 2012, reviewed and approved, on september 10, 2012. now, what was approved was a site permit. so it wouldn t qualify for actually doing the work. it was a conceptual design mainly for the purpose of having planning approval. so they now have a site permit which has been approved, but not issued, and we are here, i guess tonight, to deal with the penalty issue. the nine times penalty is required for work performed without permit per table 1-a-k of the 2010 san francisco building code. i sympathize with the fact that the owner was getting water in their house, and, you know, any of us would want to remedy that situation. my thoughts are that it would have been probably better had been would bei, and i, for glad to go out there and look at the situation, give them advice regarding water-proofing or what permits would