Stay updated with breaking news from Shooting somebody. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Tactics, he means what he says there yesterday. he means what he says, he also has really proven this idea that he can do anything clean shooting somebody on fifth avenue and get away with it. he was joking and has joked about his ability to run wild in the presidency, and do what he wants. i think, though, the thing that the president is going to run into, is the idea millions of people today are going to hear robert mueller say step by step, instructing people to lie, trying to stop the investigation, and that may or may not impact some people s views of the presidency. i think the courts have also be a reminder to this president he can t do whatever he wants to do, especially on the immigration front. he complains about the 9th circuit. he does that because he realizes with the census question, the travel ban being watered down a bit, he has run up into what he considers to be frustrating parts of the government but the founders call that checks and ....
Nothing further. keith morrison: and the witness left the stand. dateline wanted to talk to linda opdycke. but she did not respond to our interview request. and as for her father, wally opdycke, his lawyer e-mailed this statement. wallace opdycke had absolutely no involvement or prior knowledge of michiel oakes murder of mark stover. rumors and innuendo to the contrary are baseless and unfair. mark stover was a domestic violence terrorist. john henry browne closed with a powerful recitation of his theme, that mark stover was the bad guy. but even so, he said, oakes didn t want or plan to kill him. you don t premeditate up just to the point of shooting somebody. you premeditate the entire scenario. and what happened after this tragic event is absurd. ....
He jokingly uses the example of shooting somebody on fifth avenue, that would put him out of the reach of a murder charge. i don t think you need to be a lawyer to figure out that th whew. does not add up. there s a fundamental tenet of our democracy, which is that no person can be the judge of his own case. that is what really runs through the constitution, and that will ultimately be the sort of saving grace for our nation if someone like president trump were to actually try to pardon himself. i think the much bigger and more realistic risk is that he does try to pardon either co-conspirators or family members and that he uses his pardon power for what many would perceive to be improper personal purposes. ....
You re the lawyer here. this notion of self-pardoning, i m just a layperson. seems to me it would put the president above the law so when he jokingly uses the example of shooting somebody on fifth avenue, that would put him out of the reach of a murder charge. i don t think you need to be a lawyer to figure out that this whew. does not add up. there s a fundamental tenet of our democracy, which is that no person can be the judge of his own case. that is what really runs through the constitution, and that will ultimately be the sort of saving grace for our nation if someone like president trump were to actually try to pardon himself. i think the much bigger and more realistic risk is that he does try to pardon either co-conspirators or family and that he uses his pardon power for what many would perceive to be improper personal purposes. and that s going to be agher ....
This notion of self-pardoning, i m just a layperson. seems to me it would put the president above the law so when he jokingly uses the example of shooting somebody on fifth avenue, that would put him out of the reach of a murder charge. i don t think you need to be a lawyer to figure out that this whew. does not add up. there s a fundamental tenet of our democracy, which is that no person can be the judge of his own case. that is what really runs through the constitution, and that will ultimately be the sort of saving grace for our nation if someone like president trump were to actually try to pardon himself. i think the much bigger and more realistic risk is that he does try to pardon either co-conspirators or family members and that he uses his pardon power for what many would perceive to be improper personal purposes. and that s going to be a tougher question that most likely the congress would have to deal with ....