Sid Into Law News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

potentially coming in days. >> they attack medication that for 20 years the fda ruled as being safe. se restrictions on abortion. that's where >> i do believe in commonsense restrictions on abortion that's where america is at >> as republican presidential hopefuls continue to struggle with the abortion issue post-roe. >> i would literally sign the most conservative pro-life legislation that they can get through congress. >> even if it was six weeks. >> i'm not going to talk about six or five or seven or ten. and the gun debate, after more mass shootings in tennessee and kentucky - ...

>> no, that actually is something that -- not subject -- no, actually that's not true the important thing is that it actually would be accuse for removal. the charges that are not subject -- otherwise you can charge anyone. you can have some politically appointed prosecutors.n remove just as jackson said, a famous american jurist, he said the power of a politically motivated prosecution, they can remove anybody on anything, and, therefore, in israel under the unanimous decision of the israeli supreme court, you issu. based on charges that can be politicized. so that hasn't changed and that is ...

Recent ruling over the counter, and i don't think that there should be second-guessing of the scientific-based process that fda goes it has such repercussions beyond the drug mifepristone to -- you know, we want to be able to rely on a science-driven process that the fda has. proces versus state here in wisconsinl versus state here in wisconsin assuming that the newly configured supreme court decides that the 1800 law is essentially null and void, that it's obsolete it's likely that wisconsin's abortion law would revert to a law that was passed in the '80s that would essentially make 20 weeks ...

Said about roe v. wade take a listen. i'm curious of your reaction. >> roe v. wade whether you agree with it orient, there's a 20-year precedent with this thing and now to the american public it looks like republicans are coming in. >> there was a doctor from new jersey who was testifying before congress and just grieving about how all of her patients were in. >> there was a fearful. i'm thinking, nothing will change in new jerseyjersey. she doesn't understand the law, or if she understands it, she's deliberately mischaracterizing it what dobbs does is it is reflective of the state. in louisia...

>> i'm >> i'm not quite sure what you're asking for. i don't sign all briefs all day. we have a political process by which we resolve issues. that particular ruling seems to be going through -- it was on a process-oriented thing among the reasons the way they ruled, the way i'm told, is the fda did not follow correctly the administrative proceeds act. that's a question of fact that can be resolved by the court and it's actively being resolved the broader question is how do you resolve the issues in general? i think returning it to the states to allow a state's values to guide is very important...