Slaytive Acts News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

are inherent in marbury versus madison are like delivering a seal when requested, because there is a separate statute, and the secretary of the state had two of the hats on and he was on one hand the direct agent of the president, and that could never be examinable by the courts, but on the other hand, the original statute had imposed all of the purely ministerial duties that had to do with the recordkeeping and delivering of documents and if you had a land deed that had a seal on it, and the person asked for it no, discretion at all, but the take-care clause, there is no statute tha...

Been held criminally liable, and that's in the face at least with the respect of the legislators of an explicit constitutional privilege. >> i don't view the united states versus johnson or ex parte of virginia as discretionary distinction and what johnson says is that it does not say, hey, when you were doing these other things that were ministerial, it is legislative acts, it is drawing between legislative and nonlegislative acts and that is the right reading of ex parte virginia and they go on the say judicial acts and the argument of picking a jury and they don't use the words to my recoll...

The -- sorry, the legislative case is johnson is between ledge s slaytive acts and nonlegislative acts and this is judicial and judicial acts and this is presidential and nonpresidential acts and everything in the indictment is nonpresidential acts. your honor, i see that -- >> may i? >> there are a number of precedents or cases that the supreme court has reviewed cases of the president, and the case of youngstown where the supreme court reviewed harry truman's seizure of the steel mills in the korean war and the case of little bahrain where president johnson restricted the vessels, and where ...