Stay updated with breaking news from Sp rating service. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
And the islamic state is a big problem for barack obama. the more they criticize him, it s going to be a big problem for republicans who are going to be challenged you have to will the means to that end and what are your means. both of these topics isis and iraq are going to be big issues for whoever the next president is. there s no way the battle against isis will be over by the time president obamama leaves er office. and under the pottery barn theory you can t extricate yourself from iraq more broadly. so this is clearly going to be a big part of the debate in 2016 not just on the republican side but what would hillary do and would she be different from barack obama? and wouldn t it be nice if the questions that are being asked about whether you would have done what george w. bush did in 2003 were similarly asked of hillary clinton about what happened in 2011 when the president decided to pull all of the troops out? george suggested that nation ....
Expense of voting and pick a president, we would say they can t do that. why? because it is not in the law. we are sworn to uphold the constitution and the law and it has to be consistent and agreed upon with three branches of government. one cannot overrule the other two. that is all i am saying. we learned that in 9th grade civics but i am convince add lot of ivy league law schools for got that basic information along the way. i am sure you will say a lot of interesting things in the campaign today. thank you for coming in with us today and shari the holiday weekend with us. we. keep asking you questions on the campaign trail. next, with isis growing as a threat is this any time to shut touch the government surveillance program? we talk with ambassador john bolton a leading supporter of ....
Public. this week senator rand paul took to the senate floor for almost 11 hours to speak out against continuing the nsa phone record program. here s how he later explained it. i m for getting terrorists and looking at records of terrorists. i want to use the constitution is senator paul guilty of mccarthyism. that statement was not mccarthyism. i agree with it. given the implication that americans are having nsa listen to their phone calls and read they are e-mails and information is presented in such a confusing and confused way, that i think there s a lot of demagoguery going on. that s one of the reasons why the votes in congress are so up in the air. even many members don t fully appreciate how this program works and what it does and what provisions are built into it. while congress debates how to protect there s the threat from isis only grows. after the terror group took the ....
Issue. i think i ve actually seen that part of the problem overcome. i think you ve got to be a realist about this. i wasn t in this primarily for myself anyway i was in it to accomplish the objective of getting foreign defense policy the first job of the presidency to be the center of the debate. as you say you would have run as a national security hawk now that you re out of the race are there any people that are currently and likely to be in who you are comfortable with on those issues and any that you re very much uncomfortable with on those issues? i m talking on the republican side. i don t think for this point any way the s&p rating service for the other republican candidates my aim is to push all of them to talk more how they feel about national security. that is the president s top job. it s not enough to read a speech and not enough the kapd dates have to demonstrate in their guts that they understand protecting the country is job one. most of the candidates are moving ....
Reasons to do something or at least seem to be doing something. but once again, obama is letting the tools he will use determine the mission he will undertake. and he s trying to fight isis by limited means that isn t working, more american involvement will be required to defeat this but i don t think he s prepared to do it and i m not sure he ever will be. i want to pick up on that. it s not just the rhetoric from the president we re not losing it s also his actions and there s no indication that he s changing his strategy that he s going to significantly increase the number of u.s. troops in iraq or change the mission of the u.s. troops in iraq. that raises the question bob, do you see any way we can win this war given the current strategy? well it s going to be difficult. i mean first of all, there s kind of a leadership problem on this that in the white house, in many white houses and let s state this is a really hard case there s a tendency to ....