Time? i had money offers of attorneys and one was from the american civil liberties union, yes. the question is did the civil liberties union supply you with an attorney? they did supply an attorney. the answer is yes? the answer is yes. you know the civil liberties union has been listed for a front and doing work for the communist party? mr. chairman this was 193 2. i know it was in 1932. do you know they since have been listed as a front for doing work of the communist party? i do not know they have been listed so sir. you do not know. i have heard that mentioned or read that mentioned. we see similarities in these two senators. joining me is the washington post nia malika henderson and writing for the dallas morning news, wayne slater also the author of bush s brain. i saw it this week and watched the way he sits there in that indietive manner of his, throwing out incredible innuendo like, unless you tell us where you got that speech money from
you don t know they have been listed? i have heard that mentioned or read that mentioned. we see some similarities in these two senators. joining me is the washington post s nia-malika henderson and senior political writer for the dallas morning news wayne slater, who is the author of bush s brain. i watch there in which he sits there in that prosecutorial manner throwing out incredible innuendo like unless you tell us where you got that speech money from, we can assume it came from north korea. i m sorry, how do you make comments like that when everybody knows they don t have a nickel to rub together up there? they got nothing. who would you speak to in north korea? just throwing that out so then he has to deny it and then he gets into the game of he denies being an agent of the north koreans. this is mccarthyism. there s no other word for it. even looks like mccarthy the way he does this stuff. wayne. well, he does.
For and doing the work of the communist party? mr. chairman, this was 1932. i know it was 1932. do you know that they since have been listed as a front for and doing the work of the communist party? i do not know they have been listed so, sir. you don t know they have been listed? i have heard that mentioned or read that mentioned. we see some similarities in these two senators. joining me is the washington post s nia-malika henderson and senior political writer for the dallas morning news wayne slater, who is the author of bush s brain. i watch there in which he sits there in that prosecutorial manner throwing out incredible innuendo like unless you tell us where you got that speech money from, we can assume it came from north korea. i m sorry, how do you make comments like that when everybody knows they don t have a nickel to rub together up there? they got nothing. who would you speak to in north korea? just throwing that out so then he has to deny it and then he gets into the game of he denies being an agent of the north koreans. this is mccarthyism.
Who is the author of bush s brain. i sat there in which he sits there in that prosecutorial manner throwing out incredible innuendo like unless you tell us where you got that speech money from we can assume it came from north korea. i m sorry, how do you make comments like that when everybody knows they don t have a nickel to rub together up there. they got nothing. who would you speak to in north korea? just throwing that out so then he has to deny it and then he gets into the game of he denies being an agent 69 north koreans. this is mccarthyism. there s no other word for it. even looks like mccarthy the way he does this stuff. wayne snp. well, he does. there s a certain con den session. this is six degrees of separation way of asking questions, an old ploy and if it s done recklessly it can really cause damage. the whole purpose of this kind of six degrees of separation questioning is not to find out something, a piece of information, it s to plant a false idea. maybe you got the money from a foreign source, maybe from north korea, maybe from a muslim cal
Done, is tone-deaf on the campaign trail, saying $378,000 in speech money is pocket change, not to 99.9% of americans is it pocket change. what he meant to say is, i m focusing on the middle class. but what that statement shows, what s worse about that statement, is it assumes that the very poor in america want to stay very poor and just have a safety net. they don t. they want opportunity. and that s what mitt romney didn t get and missed in that statement. it s a pretty shocking statement. and, larry, your take over the poor fracas, if you will? you know, alex, videotape lasts forever. if these debates and the gaffes that are being committed now were in isolation in january, february, march, it wouldn t matter. but it does matter because what the republicans have created in their debates and with their gaffes like the one you mentioned that romney made are a series of television ads for president obama in the fall.