Live Breaking News & Updates on Spokemsn eylon levy

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Spokemsn eylon levy on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Spokemsn eylon levy and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Newsnight

lawyers said it is ok, i can tell the select committee it is ok and it really wasn't. is the select committee it is ok and it really wasn't-— really wasn't. is that mislead ort anise really wasn't. is that mislead organise lying? _ really wasn't. is that mislead organise lying? that - really wasn't. is that mislead organise lying? that is - really wasn't. is that mislead organise lying? that is a - really wasn't. is that mislead | organise lying? that is a good question. _ organise lying? that is a good question, from _ organise lying? that is a good question, from lawyers - organise lying? that is a good - question, from lawyers perspective it doesn't matter, both things are wrong. so misleading somebody is wrong, you cannot under professional rules mislead anyone and you can't mislead courts. 50 rules mislead anyone and you can't mislead courts.— rules mislead anyone and you can't mislead courts. so if they did, what are the ramify _ mislead courts. so if they did, what are the ramify cases? _ mislead courts. so if they did, what are the ramify cases? what - mislead courts. so if they did, what are the ramify cases? what could i are the ramify cases? what could happen? 50 are the ramify cases? what could ha . en? are the ramify cases? what could hauen? ., , , , happen? so the lawyers could be strohic. happen? so the lawyers could be strophic- they — happen? so the lawyers could be strophic. they could _ happen? so the lawyers could be strophic. they could be - happen? so the lawyers could be i strophic. they could be suspended, they could be prosecuted for perverting the course ofjustice, i think all of those options are in players i certainly think lawyer also be investigated, and disciplined, and i would say it is reasonably likely that some of them will be prosecuted through the criminal courts.— will be prosecuted through the criminal courts.- yeah. i will be prosecuted through the criminal courts.- yeah. criminal courts. wow. yeah. what do ou think criminal courts. wow. yeah. what do you think of — criminal courts. wow. yeah. what do you think of that. _ criminal courts. wow. yeah. what do you think of that. it _ criminal courts. wow. yeah. what do you think of that. it is _ criminal courts. wow. yeah. what do you think of that. it is absolutely - you think of that. it is absolutely shockin: , you think of that. it is absolutely shocking, because _ you think of that. it is absolutely shocking, because i— you think of that. it is absolutely shocking, because i respect- you think of that. it is absolutely shocking, because i respect the l shocking, because i respect the british— shocking, because i respect the british government, i'm a law—abiding citizen, i'm absolutely shocked _ law—abiding citizen, i'm absolutely shocked. yeah. ﬁst law-abiding citizen, i'm absolutely shocked. yeah.—

Lawyers , Question , Things , Wasn-t , Committee , Somebody , Lying , Lawyers-perspective-it-doesn-t-matter , Ort-anise , Courts , Anyone , Cases

Newsnight

uk joining the war with israel against gaza? ukjoining the war with israel against gaza?— ukjoining the war with israel against gaza? ukjoining the war with israel auainst gaza? , ., .. , , ., against gaza? they will accuse us of h ocris , against gaza? they will accuse us of hypocrisy, that... _ against gaza? they will accuse us of hypocrisy, that... they _ against gaza? they will accuse us of hypocrisy, that... they worry - against gaza? they will accuse us of hypocrisy, that... they worry that i hypocrisy, that... they worry that we are _ hypocrisy, that... they worry that we are not— hypocrisy, that... they worry that we are not putting enough pressure on israei— we are not putting enough pressure on israet to— we are not putting enough pressure on israel to try and de—escalate in gaza _ on israel to try and de—escalate in gaza at— on israel to try and de—escalate in gaza at the — on israel to try and de—escalate in gaza. at the first sign of any attacks— gaza. at the first sign of any attacks on our own shipping, we are prepared _ attacks on our own shipping, we are prepared to — attacks on our own shipping, we are prepared to use military action. you hear that— prepared to use military action. you hear that now. but they are separate _ hear that now. but they are separate. the houthis are making a direct— separate. the houthis are making a direct attack on the interests of the united states and the uk and other— the united states and the uk and other countries by interfering in international shipping lanes. it is a direct— international shipping lanes. it is a direct attack on our interest and we have _ a direct attack on our interest and we have a — a direct attack on our interest and we have a right to self defence to defend _ we have a right to self defence to defend ourselves. what influence the uk or— defend ourselves. what influence the uk or uk_ defend ourselves. what influence the uk or uk can bring on israel is separate — uk or uk can bring on israel is separate and is not... the arab israei— separate and is not... the arab israet issue _ separate and is not... the arab israel issue is not directly affecting our interest, although it does _ affecting our interest, although it does affect them indirectly. gk, does affect them indirectly. 0k, thank you. _ does affect them indirectly. 0k, thank you, thank— does affect them indirectly. ok thank you, thank you very much. let's speak now to eylon levy, an israeli government spokesman. we have lots to talk to you about —

In-gaza , Uk , War , Us , On-israel , Pressure , Hypocrisy , De-escalate , Ukjoining-the-war , Israei , Auainst-gaza , The-war

Newsnight

civilians out of harms way. we just had the former... the civilians out of harms way. we 'ust had the former. . .i civilians out of harms way. we 'ust had the former... the words of those politicians. — had the former... the words of those politicians. we _ had the former... the words of those politicians, we are _ had the former... the words of those politicians, we are rolling _ had the former... the words of those politicians, we are rolling out the - politicians, we are rolling out the gaza nakba, the palestinian term for ethnic cleansing. those are the words of a government minister in your government. talk words of a government minister in your government.— words of a government minister in your government. talk about some historical context... _ your government. talk about some historical context... i'm _ your government. talk about some historical context... i'm asking - your government. talk about some historical context... i'm asking youj historical context... i'm asking you about those _ historical context... i'm asking you about those words. _ historical context... i'm asking you about those words. i _ historical context... i'm asking you about those words. i want - historical context... i'm asking you about those words. i want to - historical context... i'm asking you about those words. i want to talk l about those words. i want to talk about those words. i want to talk about that _ about those words. i want to talk about that word, _ about those words. i want to talk about that word, when _ about those words. i want to talk about that word, when the - about that word, when the palestinians use the word nakba they are referring to the consequences of the decision in 1948 to try and scuttle the creation of a jewish state and declared war in 1948. that war of annihilation did not go their way and there were consequences as a result. ., , ., ., ., ., result. how is that relevant to what our result. how is that relevant to what your government — result. how is that relevant to what your government minister - result. how is that relevant to what your government minister has - result. how is that relevant to what your government minister has said | your government minister has said now, because what he is saying is we want to get rid of these people. we do not want to get rid of these people. - do not want to get rid of these people. we have been very clear in word and deed as a government and as the prime minister and defence minister had said, that we urge civilians to get to safety on the safe zone four is that we have been urging them to go to the safe zone. there are no safe zones.—

Harms-way , Spokemsn-eylon-levy , Words , Civilians , Government-minister , Politicians , Former , Ethnic-cleansing , Term , I , Ust , Gaza-nakba

Newsnight

you have been told there was a growing body of cases and that in itself was not sufficient for you the question the reliability of the horizon system. because i am not technically minded. i would expect that to come from people above. shazia saddiq was with us last night and is back tonight. she was at the inquiry today to look him in the eye and hear his words. and israel on trial — accused of genocide in gaza at the international court ofjustice in the hague by south africa vehemently deny that. its victims are broadcasting their on destruction in the wane hope that the world might do something. in the wane hope that the world might do something. iraeli government spokemsn

Cases , Horizon-system , Reliability , Body , People , Us , Shazia-saddiq , Words , Inquiry , Eye , Last-night , Genocide