Subsequently Recorded Title Transaction Exception News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Subsequently recorded title transaction exception. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Subsequently Recorded Title Transaction Exception Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Ohio Exceptions to the Marketable Title Act

Wednesday, April 14, 2021
West v. Bode,
1 the Ohio Supreme Court determined that mineral estates are subject to the statutory double barrel of both the Marketable Title Act (MTA)
2 and the Dormant Mineral Act (DMA),
3 providing surface owners two simultaneous procedures for terminating long-held mineral estates and reunifying the property. In doing so, the court shot down mineral owners’ arguments that the MTA was superseded by the later-enacted DMA. In light of
West, Ohio courts continue to analyze the specific operations of the MTA, with mixed results for mineral owners.
4
The MTA poses a particular problem for mineral owners and lessees because it operates “automatically,” without the notice requirements and opportunity to cure afforded by the DMA. ....

Monroe County , United States , Belmont County , Allanf Smith , John Miller , District Court , Ohio Supreme Court , Marketable Title Act , Dormant Mineral Act , Fifth District Court , Ohio Supreme , Subsequently Recorded Title Transaction Exception , Seventh District Court , Title Act , Mineral Act , General Assembly , New Marketable Title Act , Marketable Title Act , Estv Bode , Ohio Supreme Court , Dormant Mineral Act , மன்ரோ கவுண்டி , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , பெல்மாண்ட் கவுண்டி , ஜான் மில்லர் , மாவட்டம் நீதிமன்றம் ,

Navigating Ohio's Wild West: Exceptions to the Marketable Title Act | K&L Gates LLP

Last year in
West v. Bode,
1 the Ohio Supreme Court determined that mineral estates are subject to the statutory double barrel of both the Marketable Title Act (MTA)
2 and the Dormant Mineral Act (DMA),
3 providing surface owners two simultaneous procedures for terminating long-held mineral estates and reunifying the property. In doing so, the court shot down mineral owners’ arguments that the MTA was superseded by the later-enacted DMA. In light of
West, Ohio courts continue to analyze the specific operations of the MTA, with mixed results for mineral owners.
4
The MTA poses a particular problem for mineral owners and lessees because it operates “automatically,” without the notice requirements and opportunity to cure afforded by the DMA. ....

Monroe County , United States , Belmont County , Allanf Smith , John Miller , Kl Gates , District Court , Ohio Supreme Court , Marketable Title Act , Dormant Mineral Act , Fifth District Court , Ohio Supreme , Subsequently Recorded Title Transaction Exception , Seventh District Court , Title Act , Mineral Act , General Assembly , New Marketable Title Act , மன்ரோ கவுண்டி , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , பெல்மாண்ட் கவுண்டி , ஜான் மில்லர் , க்ல் வாயில்கள் , மாவட்டம் நீதிமன்றம் , ஓஹியோ உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , செயலற்ற தாது நாடகம் ,