Page 24 - Substantive Due Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

There is growing alarm in the lgbtq community after conservative justice clarence thomas used his opinion on roe vs. wade to target other constitutional rights previously decided by the court. clarence thomas wrote this, and future cases reshould reconsider the court's substantive due process including gris wald, lawrence and obergefell. on the last issue it was seven years ago on this very day that my next guest, the plaintiff in obergefell received a call from then president obama after the supreme court legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states. >> yes, it is, mr. president. [ inaudible ...

Inflation. it's better that that we weakennen america from within, to your point, so the communist chinese, russia, the iranians, the north koreans and all the rest have have a leg up. they benefit from what the democrat party is doing to this country. and one last footnote. nancy pelosi and the democrats are serial liars. this court specifically said they're not addressing contraception, they're not addressing marriage. they're attacking clarence thomas. read what he said. he didn't say that he opposes those rights. he said we a ought to look at different parts of the constitution to see how ...

The dissenter said, you know, in essence, watch out for what's next. justice thomas, it was a solo concurring opinion, to be sure, said, in this decision, i don't believe that there is a right to what's called substantive due process. that the consultation -- i think, even though he's -- i think we should take up this question in future cases. >> megan, would i find the most stunning, this outline of the notion of our rights -- and they're going to continue. what do you say to individuals that say, well, i think that if the law wants to interfere on it right to choose, it really doesn't impact...

Should reconsider all of this court's substantive due process precedents. he talked about same-sex marriage, the use of contraceptives, that there could be some real ramifications there, some changes. justices, we know, can't simply go relitigate, they need to be tethered to a case that comes to them. do you think that this statement he made was his way of saying, bring me a case? >> yes. he invited greater challenges to broader privacy rights. and, you know, christi, there was a time when i would have said justice chance thomas alone is saying that the court should reverse roe, alone is sayin...

Banning aboortion is not going o stop abortions and prevent unplanned pregnancy. and so for months now, because of sb-8 in texas. we've been helping people find their way from texas when they're denied care to our clinics in other states where we're able to help thefl travel and get the care that they need. this is working parents who are nov navigating childcare and jobs and everything we're navigating during the pandemic who are now forced to travel thousands of miles to get a safe and legal abortion in this country. >> and in addition to this overturning of roe v. wade, i wonder how concern...