Stay updated with breaking news from Ta the theory. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Heard a garbled communication from that plane, but all of that was difficult to reconcile from the time the reports were that pilots put in this turn and were intending, based on input of data, were intending some kind of a turn and their last communication was 12 minutes, and that didn t jive with anything because if you re fighting for control of your aircraft, if you re fighting for your life, you re going to try to let somebody know. now if it wasn t preprogrammed, what you do not have, you do not have any malice afore thougerafo evil intent, you re likely a pilot involved in heroism rather than terrorism. that s a great point. i want to bring rick gillespie in because your job is about finding lost airplanes, including your book, finding amelia, the story of amelia earha earhart, because this theory about this turn was under control as opposed to reacting to something was based not just on the acars data but also on the information that when the ....
Often there s very little sign. we have this notion that we know every part of the planet and that there should be some sign, but there are parts of the planet still beyond our reach. and the deep oceans is one of those plays. if the deep ocean reclaims something like this, there is a good possibility that we won t find it and it will suffer the same fate as millions of ship wrecks and other lost things that have been reclaimed by the ocean over the course of the last centuries. it s an incredible thought to think in this age of sort of super surveillance, slilts in the sky and everything, there might be part of the planet we don t know very well. thanks to alistair dove of the georgia aquarium. we have continuing coverage of the search for flight 370 including this theory. an upstart. gotta get going. gotta be good. good? good. growth is the goal. how do we do that? i talked to ups. they ll help us out. new technology. smart advice. we focus on the business ....
Point about terrorism. i ve been talking to intelligence sources since this plane disappeared 16 days ago and they ve told me repeatedly no indications of a connection to terrorism. i wonder, david, if i can you just this question because these are all theories, that s the best that investigators have at this point are theories. there have been cases in the past where governments, flagship airline, for instance, in the egyptair case where there were indications and, you know, pretty hard proof that the pilots flew that plane into the water, that was a conclusion the government wouldn t accept. that was a flag carrier. do you get any sense that the malaysian airlines would push back on a theory like that because it s a flagship, because it s a flagship airline or have you seen, as this investigation has developed, a better cooperation in sharing of intelligence, et cetera, from malaysian authorities? what i see is that the malaysian authorities are starting to learn how to run an acci ....
If you have the communication bus fails, no communication, pilots could have navigational abilities, still have the autopilot working, plug in no way points, other points like that. i really believe at this point, i m really starting to narrow in on a good theory that makes a lot of sense to me, that is that the communication bust itself. how is the pinging, sat com pinging at that point. i m going to be looking into that. you ve investigated crashes before. does that theory sound plausible to you? it certainly does. the turn seems to me to take it back to a place to land. on that heading, there was a very large, long runway with no obstructions. i do think the pilot certainly had the ability to fight for the flight for a while. we find in so many other accidents statistically speaking, this is what often comes up. have you a malfunction on the ....
good afternoon, jim. i initially had a theory myself that something happened that was immediate required immediate attenti attention. the whole concept of acars reporting information contrary to that sort of dashed that theory. we re back to the point where the pilots easily could have been dealing with an internal problem or had a gun to their head. they can t really say. but the fact that it would be premeditated would take away all those other scenarios. so acars is doing its normal job, they have normal communication, they have normal acars reporting, and then a line is drawn and things change drastically. we have to look at what things could cause the pilot, for instance, to turn back. and a pilot would turn back if he his plane is in trouble. and that s why he wouldn t descend and land. there are other issues. every theory as holes in it. we don t have enough information to make a complete picture. but the fact that akors and prepamming of the flight management system didn ....