point about terrorism. i've been talking to intelligence sources since this plane disappeared 16 days ago and they've told me repeatedly no indications of a connection to terrorism. i wonder, david, if i can you just this question because these are all theories, that's the best that investigators have at this point are theories. there have been cases in the past where governments, flagship airline, for instance, in the egyptair case where there were indications and, you know, pretty hard proof that the pilots flew that plane into the water, that was a conclusion the government wouldn't accept. that was a flag carrier. do you get any sense that the malaysian airlines would push back on a theory like that because it's a flagship, because it's a flagship airline or have you seen, as this investigation has developed, a better cooperation in sharing of intelligence, et cetera, from malaysian authorities? >> what i see is that the malaysian authorities are starting to learn how to run an accident investigation and they're going back and forth because of the fact they simply