Stay updated with breaking news from Terrorism thing. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
you use a magnificent example like people my age grew up watching domestic hijacking in united states. people think of hijacking as a terrorism thing. before that there were hijackings that were frequent in the united states. they were all robberies. the airlines settle them. there was an attitude in the early 70s that there was nothing you could do about it. it is out there and there will be hijackings. planes do not hijack themselves, people hijack. >> that is right. it is hard for people today to understand that there was no security and american airports in the early 60s and 70s. you had 25 or 35 hijackings a year in american airspace. there would be propublica outcry and congressional hearings about this. airline executives and faa officials would go to capitol hill and say there was nothing that we can do. if we would have security there would be destroying the
as i'm concerned. >> the white house is falling in line, or people that work in the administration are falling in line and trying to justify the numbers. >> the terrorism thing, you brought it up. it is ludicrous. the idea there are 4,000 terrorists -- >> stopped a day. >> -- at the southern border is what sarah huckabee sanders said. what she's referring to is ten known or -- >> sorry to interrupt. the president is taking questions. >> from his point of view, and speaker pelosi's was contenti s contentious. he also said you said in the meeting, him quoting you, i want to check, that the shutdown could go on for months or even a year or longer. did you say that? >> i did. >> is that your -- >> i did say that, absolutely. absolutely, i said that. i don't think it will, but i am prepared. i think i can speak for republicans in the house and republicans in the senate. they feel very strongly about having a safe country, having a border that makes sense. without borders, i've said it many times, we don't have a
>> and, colonel jack, there was this conceit during the obama administration that the president was too reluctant to talk about terrorism. he was too reluctant to call things what they were. this feels like a terrorism-related event, right, that we're getting no information about. it's clear we're going to get more information. it's just dribbling out, little by little. can the administration hide behind the terrorism thing without making the mention of the terrorism thing? >> no. i think eventually you'll get all the information. likelihood is that there are several investigations being undertaken right now. one may be an investigation, after-action report in this case and maybe even an article 32 investigation, which is the military equivalent of a grand jury procedure. all these are going to take some time. i think the administration and defense department doesn't want to say anything until it has a pretty good handle on exactly what's going on. it may very well be that there
stations involved in that and another in baton rouge, louisiana. you said the highest level of threat. >> i think it is the highest level of threat. we are coming through security with this terrorism thing. the us dealing with this for six years, in the united states, of 14-year-old child going through security, terror to us is relatively new as it pertains to isis and recent international threats. what is difficult to manage about this threat is it is internal. we have a report that was leaked, i don't believe the fbi would come close for political reasons. the president, now the trump is in the white house and surrounds himself with strong security people and a strong tone in
divorced from reality in the lead of their newscast. >> they need to get their facts straight. president trump should make a goal of that in 2017 for accurate statistics. on the terrorism thing, i would like to ask him what is it you think the american public is missing. what do you want to tell us about terrorism that you have learned since taking office. howie: now that you are at the white house you can ask him that question. how are the media treating elizabeth warren as opposed to sean spicer. a media if you aror over the president rapping nordstrom. [ distorted voice ] progressive claims to show people their competitors' rates alongside their direct rate to save you money. but what's really going on? when played backwards at 1/8th speed you can clearly hear...
it ambassador, do you get the sense that the white house could be relying on iran to fight isis because we know they are a shared enemy of ours. but netanyahu says the enemy of our enemy is our enemy. do you get the sense that in these deals there could be talks that president obama, since he doesn't seem to have the appear tight to fight isis would rely on the iranians to do that? >> i i think it's a way for the administration to show in their view commonality with iran. i will tell you what's going on. i think that ties together this statement about the american prisoners in iran. the fight against isis and the nuclear deal. i think that the administration is going for a cuba answer here. i think it's what iran wants. i think it's part of the reason why the language about hezbollah and iran and their terrorist activities disappeared this year from the worldwide threat assessment. i think the iraniansians have said let's get this terrorism thing behind us. let's have full diplomatic
catch those folks, and our resources, do we -- do we distract from the real battle at hand? this guy claims to be part of something bigger but seems to be not a part of anything other than his own twisted ideology. >> the real question is why is he out on bail more than did we get the terrorism thing right. it is difficult to parse the sex appeal that is drawing in lots of people with isis, people with western passports could come home and do things and it is hard to extract that out from what could be a emmanuel sikosi this. what needs to happen is an approach, socially, figuring out what is motivating young people
context given 10, 13 years ago. 3,000 dead americans, some jumping for their lives on to new york city sidewalks. >> context is very important. here we cop to a human level. human for us at the cia and human for those making this criticism. let me tell you something i never heard after 9/11. you know, guys, with regard to this terrorism thing. it's pretty important. but whatever you do, don't overreact to it. i never heard that, bill. now let me be a bit critical. now that we made everyone feel more comfortable. they stopped complaining that we are not doing enough to make them feel safe. but now that we are making them feel safe again, they are complaining we did too much. bill: we look forward to more information in the coming days and we hope you will come back
john killing a at state. john brennan. and this whole new group of people around him, the president, who are being tested here very quickly. let's remember what we have been talking about and you have been talking about it on your show for weeks is about immigration reform and gun control and the budget and what is he going to do on the grand budget. all of a sudden that's on the back burner. >> bill: the terrorism thing becomes a major issue because this is the second time now we have been hit and 9/11, of course, being the first. the president basically is dependent now on multi-cultural and the fbi. and those guys are notoriously tight lipped, see. this is going to have people watch this tomorrow. starting tonight it doesn't matter i will lay the analysis the rest of the week in our reportage. the going to demand quick answers like i just said with peter king. hey, when you get briefed tomorrow we want to know tomorrow night what they
your phone and i don't care. i swear on my life i'm trying. you made it clear what you want. take care. also, bill schulz sucks. >> no. >> that seemed totally necessary. the new york post reports that she was voiced by a female cousin. lauren, the state department thing getting involved, that has to hurt your business. >> i happen to be the fake girlfriend of tens of people on the internet. i am not there yet, greg. i am they nervous they are cracking down on this. it is good we nipped this terrorism thing. >> now we are focusing on imaginary girlfriends. did you learn anything from