the inescapable, inescapable conclusion is the right to an abortion is not deeply rooted in the nation s history or tradition.s the constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or prohibiting abortion, the draft concludes.rt in other words, abortion willl not be made not illegal by the federal government.st it willates be up to to the stao decidee.. d roe and casey abrogated that authority. we now overrule these a decisior and return our authority to the people and their elected representatives of a lot more inpresav this breaking news straight ahead tonight .tonigh but this is this is pretty interesting just to be very clear here, evenen though this s a draft, sounds like the likelihood that s where their their decision is headed toward. so we ll watch this very closely. also tonight , coming up,htin a bombshell new development from the durham probe. we also have disturbingo have dt new video showing alleged antifa rioting attackingnt republicans in portla
written that sounds like justice alito to me and some of his other writings. so think we hav i think we have tt with a grain of salt and again, until it comes out officiallys from the court, this means nothing votes could change. i and even if this is a legitimate draft, both couldll have changed and this could be flipped. way and we just don t know. but there are things in the writing that sound alitoesque to me not that somebody couldn t, you know, draft that of their own award and would have to believet that this was legit. but let me throw this to kelly. why would politico run the risk of basically let me run through the headline that they haveve the the supreme court has voted to overturn abortion rights draft opinion shows they re saying definitivelyy i have again, i ve never seenmy that in my life and i m skeptical. well, sometimes the headline overstates what is actually and the rest of the article. cas i think this may be the casee. o shannon s point as shannon
of work to do on this courtju tomorrow morning.st the chief justice of the united states is going to have toonve convene the justices. he s going to havee to convene the clerks and all employees of the courtt and he s going to have to say that the leaker needs to come forward. and this is very, very i serious.n itun is an unprecedented breach of the court s confidentiality and it is t plainly meant too corrupthin the process within the court. i it s an assault on the courts, john, and it s got to be taken seriously. and the chiefng justice is now going to be the one who has ton: do this inside the court. let ssk ask you, senator , one last question as conservativesn, as constitutionalists, we believe and i ve argued foreve years that this is bad law and enumerated right. not in the constitution and according to part the draft, it addresses that question by saying the constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating of or prohibiting abortion. roe and casey abro
with the deliberations, according to politico, said that four othero republican appointed justices clarence thomas, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, amy coni berrett voted with alito in the conference and held among the justices after hearingal oral arguments. this is back in december. we, a don trgument,ck i expect i decision sometime in june, maybe july, even usually in mayy or june. but the three b democratic appointed justices breyer, sotomayor, kagan, a working on one or more dissents that would be part of any final decisionf that comes out. but it s going to be interesting to watch this absolutely be demagogued by the left in the country. but at the end of the day, the document labeled as a first draft of the majority opinion, c it would indicate they may be leaning as of tonight to overruling roe v. wade. that is considered a precedent .
these drafts go back and forth. they can change votes can change until it actually is signed off by the nine justices or whoever if there are people recuse all of the justices hearing the case until it s signedere off and it s issued fm the court s office officially as an opinion of the court has. it s not the real deal . so this is a draft if it is legit, as i ve been led to believe it is from february, which means a lot off things could have changed.d there are there could be justices who would read this and say, wow, this is sweeping . i m not prepared to sign up to something this sweeping or you could have five justices who ve already saids this is something i will sign onto. and basically what it does if u this ends up being the opinion in some form or fashion, if it w uses this wording, it s essentially sending the idea of abortion back to the states and saying they will decide at the people there decide itss upholds the mississippi law and says roe and casey got it completely wr