Live Breaking News & Updates on Toxic Tort Cases

Stay updated with breaking news from Toxic tort cases. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Massachusetts Adoption Of The "But-For" Factual Causation Standard In Multiple Defendant Tort Actions And Its Impact On Toxic Tort Litigation | Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
On February 26, 2021, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) clarified the standard to be used for factual causation in multiple defendant tort actions. The SJC’s opinion in
Doull v. Foster, 487 Mass. 1 (2021), changed the standard for factual causation from the confusing “substantial contributing factor” test to the more straightforward “but for” causation standard.
The SJC differentiated cases with multiple sufficient causes, such as asbestos and other toxic tort matters, due to the difficulty in establishing “which particular exposures were necessary to bring about the harm.” [
Doull at p. 14]. The Court did, however, leave open the possibility that it may also replace the “substantial factor” test in those cases as well.  This potential for a new causation standard has created tremendous uncertainty as to which standard will be used for toxic tort cases in Massachusetts go ....

United States , Laura Doull , Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court , While The Court , Raymark Industries Inc , Adler Pollock , Doull Decision , Multiple Defendant Negligence , Toxic Tort Cases , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , லாரா டோவுல் , மாசசூசெட்ஸ் உச்ச நீதித்துறை நீதிமன்றம் , போது தி நீதிமன்றம் ,