We want you to stay. The cladding used on Grenfell Tower is withdrawn from around the world. The Us Supreme Court has partially lifted an injunction against president Donald Trumps travel ban. And a new Aircraft Carrier hms Queen Elizabeth Sets Sail For The First Time from the Rosyth Dockyard in fife. Its 5 oclock. Our main story is that after more than two weeks of talks the conservatives and the Democratic Unionist Party have agreed a parliamentary deal to support theresa mays Minority Government. It will mean an extra £1 billion for health, education and infrastructure in Northern Ireland. The conservatives have also agreed to keep the so called triple lock on pensions and maintain universal winterfuel payments for pensioners. Leaders in scotland and wales have condemned the deal other parties have raised concerns that the deal will cause problems in Northern Ireland. Our Political Correspondent iain watson reports. Why has it taken so long . Theresa may had wanted to seal a deal w
phaseout occurred this year-year pieces of. what do you make of that? there are a lot of people who will lose their coverage but it s not in, quote, unquote, the scoring window so it doesn t come into effect on monday. john wants a vote this thursday. you re reaching up front. what s the. this is one-sixth of the economy. we need to know what we re doing. we need we should have a public hearing. we should allow the public to have an opportunity. my lines have lit up on people kag and some. to try to get this is not how
far, and that at least parts of the travel ban should be allowed to go into effect. reporter: but for those with family, business or educational ties to the u.s., the executive order will remain on hold as long as those seeking a visa can prove a close familial relationship or a connection to a business entity that is documented in the normal course, they may be considered for entry. people like students who have been accepted at university or a worker hired by a company. they have threaded the needle quite eloquently where they have dealt with the people with the biggest hardships, the saddest stories. reporter: in part they say the decision didn t go far enough and should have allowed the full travel ban to go into effect, just as clarence thomas argued the piecemale approach may be unworkable, writing, today s compromise will burden executive officials with the task of deciding on peril of
global indicate that the people coming from these countries have not caused problems in america to the numbers we have seen from people who live here, people who are citizens, et cetera. it s a phony argument about america s security. i am happy the supreme court is is taking the case. i hope they ll act with clarity. we will not allow a religious task as to who can come to america. i hope they also will speak to a lot of what president trump tried to do with his executive order. they did uphold part of the ban until they hear the case. for most people visiting the united states from these countries, they do have a connection so they ll be able to come here. i m very disappointed, though, about refugees. i know it s a temporary ban for 120 dies, but this will be people hurt with that ban going back into effect. as you say, the band will eventually affect the syrians
we re standing by with democratic senator ben cardin. senator, there is another piece of information. president trump lets part of his travel ban go into effect. jessica, update our viewers on what happened. reporter: the surprise in all of this was the split, the fact that the supreme court let parts of this travel ban stand while at the same time saying that four nationals with some connection to this country, they can come in. that was somewhat unexpected, and that s exactly what has led to both sides in this case claiming at least a partial victory. in the unsigned opinion, the court sided with the government in part, temporarily barring entry from foreign nationals who are unable to make a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the united states. i think it s clear from the decision that most of the justices think that the lower court decisions went a bit too