Page 12 - Trial Setting News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

UPDATE: COURT PROCEEDING SCHEDULED FOR SEDALIA MAN WHO HAD HIS CONVICTIONS SET ASIDE

Two men are facing felony charges after authorities located more than two pounds of marijuana during a traffic stop in June of last year in Lafayette County. During a search of the vehicle, Lafayette County deputies say they found a total of 2.17 pounds of marijuana. Michael Eugene Jensen, 48, and Rick William Lawson, 40, both of Versailles, are charged with a Class C Felony for Delivery of a Controlled Substance. Additionally, Lawson is charged with a Class D Felony for Possession of a Controlled Substance Except 35 Grams or Less of Marijuana/Synthetic Cannabinoid and a Class E Felony for Un...

A court proceeding in the case of a Marshall man facing felony charges after an alleged assault to a farm hand on February 28, 2020 has been rescheduled. During the morning hours of February 28, the Saline County Sheriff’s Office responded to a call in regards to an assault that had taken place on a farm facility just south of Marshall Junction where the victim reportedly suffered fractures and facial trauma as a result of the assault at the hands of 42-year-old Aaron Smith. Smith has been charged with a Class B Felony for Assault in the First Degree. The court amended Smith’s bond on Sep...

Biden says he'd comply with any lawful order. also, he's quote, not going to pretend there's any legal basis for republicans to subpoena me for my testimony. joining me now is former federal prosecutor and legal analyst glenn kirschner in washington. is the vice president correct here? what would be the legal basis, if any, for a biden subpoena? >> garrett, because an impeachment hearing is not exactly a legal proceeding, it's hard to say what rules will be adopted to govern, for example, what witnesses can be called. i will say, if this was a trial setting, there would be no lawful basis for ...

And so members of congress want to make these arguments about what the president didn't know and so on and so forth. but they're just going on what their opinions are. and trying to be hopeful about that. if they want to make a counterargument, then the president needs to allow some of these other witnesses to show up and he needs to cough up these documents that can shed light. and if this is actually what the president thought at the time and there's evidence of that, then fine, the congress can consider that both with respect to impeachment and if they impeach then with respect to the trial...