way that they know who this informant might be if there is one? no, they don t say who this person might be and how that person might have come to know that information. the feature of mar-a-lago and of trump world, as you know, is that there weren t a lot of checks on people coming and going in that circle. so there s just many, many people, we ve been making calls, and there s a number of people that come to mind when you talk to people about who this could be. the idea, kim, of who could ve had access, who could ve seen something in some way, or have been witness to something, is really curious here. as evan points out, this investigation, the timeline alone, has been going on for over a year. there was a june of this year, june meeting at mar-a-lago, between trump s lawyers. and then this search happened. something had to have happened in that time to go from this conversation, the idea of discussions happening to an unannounced execution of a search warrant at the es
how would investigators know where to look, or is at the idea of, look, in this residence, there might be evidence, or probable cause, to believe that evidence exists of a crime. and whatever is inside, and whatever evidence might be found, whatever the good stuff is kept, i m looking there. well, look, laura, you know he has around the clock secret service detail and, look, they can easily be vulnerable to being put in a situation, either administratively meaning that they can be brought in unquestioned administratively by the fbi or under a grand jury subpoena with respect to what they see in with a here. my assumption is that you had secret service agents either disgruntled secret service protective agent who may have seen or heard something and i think the word is immediacy, i think the execution of the search warrant on tuesday is evident of some immediate