Stay updated with breaking news from Vivian donohue. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
one of our members had to leave. she wrote this letter. i have been a resident of bayview-hunters point since 1989. i will comment on the role of the representatives amybrownell. representative amy brownell. the department of public health was supposed to particularly protect the public s health near the to the limit. nearby residents began complaining of high levels of dust and resulting health problems. there are numerous hearings due to the residents concerns, yet the department of public health always diminished complaints and reassured the residents that their concerns were overblown. as a resident, i was concerned about the monitoring process and the apparent dismissal of the request for tests for toxins, particularly the most vulnerable young children. the presence of airborne asbestos is particularly prevalent. eventually, the plan was approved by the san francisco board of supervisors. now we have evidence that the very agency, the department of public heal ....
live. they have nosebleeds. i know you have heard this before. i have been here before, many times. i have a 9-year-old. he still has nosebleeds. when they go to school, they won t stop. they send paramedics for him. he still has nosebleeds today. my grand kids, when they overdid the dust, they had nosebleeds, like many other children, and the main thing we are here for is to ask amy brownell to step down. i have been in meetings with her. she says this community is not sick. if they truly believed that, why wouldn t they test the children and the elderly? why wouldn t they do that? i know of some more elderly people that i don t even see any more. i think they have passed on. what i am concerned about is my grand kids, 20 years from today. that is out. it does not take but one particle. [tone] supervisor campos: thank you for coming to speak. next speaker, please. good afternoon, supervisors. my name is douglas. i have lived in san francisco for 69 years. i have work ....
live. they have nosebleeds. i know you have heard this before. i have been here before, many times. i have a 9-year-old. he still has nosebleeds. when they go to school, they won t stop. they send paramedics for him. he still has nosebleeds today. my grand kids, when they overdid the dust, they had nosebleeds, like many other children, and the main thing we are here for is to ask amy brownell to step down. i have been in meetings with her. she says this community is not sick. if they truly believed that, why wouldn t they test the children and the elderly? why wouldn t they do that? i know of some more elderly people that i don t even see any more. i think they have passed on. what i am concerned about is my grand kids, 20 years from today. that is out. it does not take but one particle. [tone] supervisor campos: thank you for coming to speak. next speaker, please. good afternoon, supervisors. my name is douglas. i have lived in san francisco for 69 years. i have work ....
strategies in the process of developing the regulation. in the issue of environmental review, for certain iss air quality and noise, the planning department now, given our capacity, when they have a major project or controversy, or an issue, they make a referral to us to look at the environmental report. they will ask us to look early in the process to see if the analysis is adequate and correct, and they will take our opinions and analysis in consideration. we don t have they and their commission make the final judgment. finally, on the proactive information, like the healthy development tool, there are no regulations. we typically will, when we do one of these evaluations, we will bring to the planning department and project proponent our analysis and a set of recommendations. we will have a dialogue with them. ok, we can do these things. we cannot do these things. those have to do with improving the neighborhood, like improving parks and transportation conditions ....
environmental rules are triggered, required. they will tell that they will make a referral. they will tell the project posed a proponent that he needs to get the soil analysis required requirement. they make sure they are captured by us and they wait. it is our judgment without interference from them about what an adequate soil analysis is and what medications they have to do. they make those requirements part of the project conditions. that is generally how it works with the new regulation. when we are developing regulations, it is like the air quality assessment. there is a coordination. there are feasibility issues. they will help us bring the conversation about the environmental goal to the discuss the different feasible strategies in the process developing the regulation. in the issue of environmental review, for certain iss air quality and noise, the planning department now, given our capacity, when they have a major project or controversy, or an issue, they m ....