Live Breaking News & Updates on Wasnt Cybersecurity
Stay updated with breaking news from Wasnt cybersecurity. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Warm embrace from the global community. that s probably going to be his new year s resolution. so from one hot spot to another, let s go to syria. all of a sudden, another change in tune from the president here. he told fox last night he s not in favor of a rapid withdrawal. in fact, listen to what the president said in that interview. i never said that i m going to rush out. we re going to get out. we re getting out of syria, bringing our young great troops home after so many years. you know, we were supposed to be in syria for three to four months. that was four or five years ago. and it s time. we have to bring them home. and we re going to do it in a very good way. so the new york times has actually put a number on the timeline. they re saying four months. so this is a bit slower than perhaps we thought from the president s initial comments on this. how could that impact the situation there? first, let s talk about what the president s done with respect to why our troops ....
What was the example that she wanted to set at that latter part of her life? well, she knew that cancer was a battle. she was planning on fighting it. she was hoping to survive. but she wasn t going to let it get her down. once she came to terms with it, she said i make people laugh and i m not going to stop doing that. she pressed forward and tried to live life to the fullest and not give up. for her, it worked. unfortunately at the end, there was a sad ending, but in dealing with the cancer journey, sometimes it s not the ending that matters, but how good you can make the journey. you don t know what the end is going to be, but you can make the journey as good as possible. i love that. so many of today s comedy stars appear in the film talking about her and her influence. ....
Like, please, let it be her, because of her stumble with the native americans. that s nonsense, and she s going to get called on that every time she tries to say something about president trump. they re going to go back to that. she s not authentic. you know, even her hometown paper the boston globe told her don t run. your time is past and we don t think you re the best candidate. i think she ll be in a lot of trouble. but it s such a crowded field. she has name i.d., and she probably has a good organization coming into it, so she s go to be in the front of the pack to start. scott, let s get you take on this. rob kind of alluded to the timing of the announcement. first of all, new year s eve, and it also came in the midst of a partial government shutdown. part of the reason you form an exploratory committee is for the purpose of raising big bucks. are you concerned she might have an optics issue, trying to raise cash when federal workers aren t even getting paychecks? it s a long ....
Someone like beto o rourke? they would, but right now, this is all name recognition, if you will. this isn t viability or likability and organization. so until we get everyone in the race, until the debates start, because they ll be falling like you saw on the republican side in 2016, who has the staying power? i would watch for a former governor of a southern state, like a terry mcauliffe, because he can raise the money. he can mix it up with trump. he may be connected to the clintons and may make an issue of it, but he has a strong record of accomplishment in the state of virginia. that type of candidate is going to be a real problem who can reach out to a cross section of voters, black, white, yellow, brown, or whatever part of the country they re in and get those votes. if he s the man, if you will, then i think trump and the republicans are going to have a real problem. okay. scott, it wasn t insulting, it was the truth. the identity politics. it can be both. you can be in ....
Essentially voice vote a deal and then the president backed off it. it was a deal none of the republicans liked but the president asked them to do it, then he changed his mind. i don t think you ll see mitch mcconnell get in the middle, risk another vote that the president decides to throw away. this is up to nancy pelosi, chuck schumer, and president trump. once they have a deal, you ll see enough republicans in the senate onboard to get that done. but i think we re looking at this to possibly last quite a while because the president and the democrats are far apart on the issue of the wall specifically. not necessarily border security, but the wall, because of all the politics that s wrapped up in that. of course. so catherine, a big part of that politics involved the house freedom caucus, that relatively small group of conservative house members that were the ones who got in the middle of the deal to begin with. this is what mark meadows said after the plan from the democrats came ....