Stay updated with breaking news from Who aids. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
the fight is over. but senior republicans, including former vice president mike pence welcome the ruling. millions of women across the united states have lost their constitutional right to abortion, after a ruling of momentous significance by the country s supreme court. it has overturned a 50 year law that legalised abortion nationwide and it now means that individual us states are legally able to ban it. up to half of america s 50 states are expected to do so and 13 have already passed so called trigger laws which automatically outlaw abortion with the court s ruling. in the past hour, president biden has said it was a sad day for the court and for the country. 0ur north america editor sarah smith reports now on an issue and a decision which has polarised the united states. this is a huge, historic moment for america. as they hear the news from the court, there isjubilation from anti abortionists. life won today! life won today, they chant, celebrating a v ....
Senior legal analyst laura coates about this. good evening to you. what do you think of what justin kagan said, her warning? justice caning is absolutely right. this would be the definitive slippery slope. we hear about this could be a slippery slope, might have a domino effect. if you allow states to be able to an end run around judicial review, you give them cart blanch to do whatever they want as long as they figure out a way not to have a state actor enforce the law. remember, fundamentally what s wrong with this case is normally if you want to try to prevent a law from going into effect, you have to be able to sue the state actor who is charged under the statute to actually enforce the law. in texas they decided, huh, we will avoid that by allowing anyone in the country, not a state actor in texas, to be able to sue anyone who aids in an abortion. thereby allowing them to just avoid judicial review. now, if that s allowed, she is ....
To do an end run around judicial review, you essentially give them carte blanche to do whatever they want as long as they can figure out a way not to have a state actor enforce the law. remember, fundamentally what s wrong with this case is that normally, if you want to try to prevent a law from going into effect, you have to be able to sue the state actor who was charged under the statute to actually enforce the law. in texas, they decided, huh, we will avoid that by allowing anyone in the country, not a state actor in texas, to be able to sue anyone who aids in an abortion. thereby, allowing them to just avoid judicial review. now, if that is allowed, she is right. it s not just hot-button issues like abortion or gun rights or anything else. it could be everything that could be fair game. and that s not a blueprint that can actually sustain itself. so, the judges who already voiced opposition to the texas law are obviously in favor of letting it be challenged. but surprisingly, con ....
Sterben: Die letzten Tage im Hospiz nzz.ch - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from nzz.ch Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Tourismus: welche Lehren man beim Reisen aus der Pandemie ziehen kann sueddeutsche.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from sueddeutsche.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.