Live Breaking News & Updates on Williams V Hanson

The District Court committed multiple fundamental errors in refusing to dismiss this suit and plaintiffs can i ask you to speak up just a little bit . Bring the microphone a little closer, if you can. And the plaintiffs are fundamentally mistaken in asserting that this court is powerless to correct any of those errors at this time. Now, we have identified two different paths through which this court can have mandamus relief. The Supreme Court made clear that separation of powers considerations are of utmost important when considering mandamus petitions involving the president of the United States. For example, the court quoted chief Justice Marshall to say that in no case would a court be required to proceed against the president as it would against a private indivi ....

New York , United States , Saudi Arabia , Reagan Loc , Williams V Hanson , Clinton V Jones , District Court , Paths Court , Court Mandamus , Supreme Court , Court Made , Justice Marshall , Case Court , Court Required , Court Said , Office President , Judge Court , Court Still , Even District Court , Court Following , Court Say , Lower Court , Court Will , First Step , Supreme Court Precedent , Court Precedent ,