Page 7 - Won T Act News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Land that welcomes immigrants, you must first secure the border and secure it now the simple truth is there is a worldwide migrant crisis. and if the united states done to secure our border, there no limit to the number of people may try to come here because there's no better place in the planet than united states of america. for those, just say the steps i've taken are too strict. i say you that be patient and goodwill american people are going to work wearing thin right now doing nothing is not an option. we have to act must act consistent with both our law and our values are values american...

Opportunity to seek refuge in the united states these are, these are serious consequences where it's a serious reversal. but the bottom line is, there's efforts to make with congress. congress has refused to act, and the presidency left no choice. >> all right. john sandweg. thank you so much, really, really great to have you and we appreciate that context. thank you. >> still had the sour on cnn news central prosecutors use hunter biden's own words against him as they play nearly an hour of audio clips for jurors, while the latest from the courtroom where the president's son is being tried we...

About that, but there is a legal process that is decidedly not political and this is the process with the safeguards that couple of the members of the court have already referred to. we are talking about prosecutors who are, you know, follow strict codes and are presumed to act with regularity, grand jurors and petit jury and the supreme court above it, and i want to talk about the floodgate and since watergate has there been societal widespread recognition including executives and president, that the president is subject to criminal prosecution, and nixon was about private conduct, but about ...

Ratification discussions, and there was nothing in that, and we have cited certain things in the brief from james wilson and edward pendleton, and justice story, and nothing from hamilton, and all that hamilton was describing is the undisputed point that a sitting president cannot be held for prosecution and removal of office and whether that removal is impeachment and conviction or simply the end of the term. now, a structural point as well that i want to make that the district court made is if this rule were right, and if the precedent rule were correct, it would pose significant separation ...

Some in the question of the office seeker versus office holder, and so do we use the blasingame for that? >> if this court decides way the district court did, then blasingame does not have a role at all, because if this act is official or set of allegations are official, then the question is based on the fitzgerald analysis and history precedent, et cetera, and is there any quantum of immunity for a former president, and we believe that the answer to that question is no, and the reason of the district court then to turn to the indictment and consider this outer perimeter, civil outer perimeter...