Page 8 - Wrong Doers News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> and the moment i never saw coming. >> i have a little gift for you. it is a subpoena. this is from your audience. whom i'm representing. it's you to, piers morgan. i want you to tell us under oath how many times you have been properly in love, under oath. >> i'm not accepting that. >> "piers morgan tonight" starts now. >> one woman strikes fear into the hearts of powerful men from herman cain to tiger woods. if you have a secret to keep, do you not want to hear that glori allred is on the case. she is the most famous female attorney in the country. what matters to her most is her ...

problems. >> these should be actual cuts. real reforms to these programs, not broad deficit or deficit targets that punt the questions to the future. and with the exception of tax hikes which, in my opinion, will destroy america's jobs, everything is on the table. >> what serious conversation about debt reduction begins by absolutely taking the possibility or discussion of tax hikes off the table? >> not very many serious discussions. i remember when i was little, my dad took me to a car dealership, ali, and he said, this is how you buy a car. i remember they wrote numbers on a piece...

Think about that. and they want to cut the fbi. one of their proposals to cut the fbi, we ought to increase the fbiç so we can go after th wrong doers, confiscate their assets, make them pay their criminal penalties and help balance the budget. >> are there any key party people you might be able to agree with on cuts? of course, they want to propose and bigger cuts, but are there -- is there any room for agreement there? >> i think that we're looking for agreement. i think that across every account, we have to make reasonable cuts. i think the president's proposal for a freeze over five year...

They have been very blunt about it, but as you just pointed out by tim pawlenty, it seems marco rubio was afraid to say that himself. >> no, i agree. i think republicans that oppose changing the 14th amendment need to be a little more forthright in order to provide an alternative voice. republicans have been arguing about this issue since the mid-'90s where you had pete wilson doing proposition 187 and you had george bush in texas running in a very different kind of manner, appealing to hispanic voters. and right now clearly the restrictionists have an upper hand. and, you know, this is a case...

Where this 14th amendment debate really clarifies the issue in a lot of ways. if you're talking about building a border fence, you're talking about punishing wrong doers, people that break the law. if you're talking about changing the 14th amendment, you're talking about punishing infants in hospitals. there's a fundamental lack of generosity, and i think kind of seriousness in this kind of proposal. it -- you know, it -- it shows the republicans in a very bad light, and there has to be another side to this argument. >> and roger, here's what i don't understand. they had a good issue in basica...