Clarifying or Confusing the Quandary of Identical Marks: Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. v. Vijaya Sai and Others

We’re pleased to bring you a guest post by Sangita Sharma, looking at the Supreme Court’s order in the trademark infringement case Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. v. Vijaya Sai and Others. Sangita is a 3rd Year student at Gujarat National Law University and has written for us earlier here.Clarifying or

Related Keywords

India ,Sangita Sharma ,Sanjayv Shah Andors ,V Sadas Vertbaudet ,Imran Khan ,Eashan Ghosh ,Ruston Hornsby ,Pm Diesels Private ,Gujarat National Law University ,Supreme Court ,Jsb Cement Llp ,Assam Roofing Limited And Others ,High Court Misinterpretation ,Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc ,Yahoo ,Trial Court ,High Court ,Renaissance Hotel Holdings ,Identical Marks ,Zai Sangita ,Vijaya Sai ,Trade Marks Act ,Trade Marks Directive ,Sadas Vertbaudet ,Private Limited ,Thukral Mechanical Works ,Shambhu Nath ,Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma ,Pharmaceutical Laboratories ,Hornsby Limited ,Patent ,Intellectual Property ,Patents ,Startups ,China ,International ,Nafta ,Investor ,Investors ,Patent Attorney ,Patent Law ,Software Patents ,Startup ,Patent Lawyer ,Business Founder ,China Intellectual Prop ,Lip ,Patent Reform ,Software Patent ,Startup Founder ,China Patent ,Founder ,International Ip ,International Patent ,Nafta Ip ,Nafta Patent ,Patent Investor ,Patent Troll ,Startup Intellectual ,Startup Ip ,Startup Patent ,Startup Patents ,