Transcripts For SFGTV City Attorney Press Availability 20240712

Next slide unsuccessful. Next slide. And we arrived before you today, faced with the chronic structural deficit, and the positions established in 2019 and a wind down in operations on what was essentially left in the bank come july 2019. And since then we have essentially made the rounds with the Property Owners to collect their signatures on the expanding the district and to this date weve had a weighted percentage of 42. 9 of Property Owners return those signs to disestablish the c. B. D. S. Next slide, please. Thats the conclusion of my presentation. Supervisor mar thank you, for the presentation and for all of your work at the top of broadway c. B. D. Supervisor peskin . Supervisor peskin thank you, chair mar and supervisor haney. I just want to thank all of the par it tis pants in the top of broadway c. B. D. And dominic and marco for their work. Im sorry to see it go, but it is what it is and maybe some day in the future it can be recreted with a larger scale that will ultimately work but, clearly, that time is not now so thank you for your work over the years. And im sorry to see it go. But as i said, it is what it is. Agreed. Supervisor mar thank you, supervisor peskin. Why dont we go to Public Comment. Mr. Clerk, any callers on the line for this item . Clerk thank you, mr. Chair. Operations is checking to see if we have callers in the cue. Please let us know if we have callers that are ready. For those who have already connected to our line, press star, followed by 3, to be added to the queue if you wish to speak for this item. For those on hold in the queue wait until youre prompted to begin and your prompt informs you that your line is unmuted. For those watching our meeting on cable channel 26 or streaming link or through the website, if you wish to speak on this item now is the time to call. Do so by dialing 1 415 6550001. And enter the meeting i. D. Of 1467063442. Press the pound symbol twice and then press star, and followed by 3 to enter the queue to speak. Do we have any callers . Mr. Chair, there are no callers in the queue. Supervisor mar thank you. There are no callers, Public Comment is closed. Supervisor peskin to make a motion . Supervisor peskin i would like to move this item to the full board with recommendation. Supervisor mar thank you. Mr. Clerk, please call roll. Clerk on the motion offered by supervisor peskin, [roll call] mr. Chair, there are three as. Supervisor mar thank you, mr. Clerk. Call item number 2. Clerk yes. Agenda item 2 is receiving and approving an annual report for the Castro Upper Market Community benefit district for fiscal year 2082019, submitted as required by the property and Business Improvement district law of 1994 and the california streets and highways code, and with the districts Management Agreement with the city. To make Public Comment call 1 415 6550001. Enter the meeting i. D. Of 1467063442. Press pound symbol twice to connect to the meeting and then press the star key, followed by 3 to enter the queue to speak. When its your turn to speak, the system will prompt you by telling you that your line is unmuted. Mr. Chair. Supervisor mar thank you, mr. Clerk. I welcome back the presenter for this item. Thank you, supervisors and chair mar and ill be sharing my screen right now. Are you able to see that . Supervisor mar yes. Great. Thank you. Today were here for the Castro Upper Market Community benefit district annual report. Im chris corgis with economic and workforce development. As previously mentioned, c. B. D. S are governed by two laws, state law in 1994 act and our local law which is article 15 of the business and tax regulations code. This resolution will cover the annual report for fiscal year 20182019 for the castro upper market c. B. D. , oewd ensures that all c. B. D. S are meeting Management Plans. Our staff has an annual review of the reports and Financial Statements and oewd provides the board of supervisors with a summary memo. The castro upper market c. B. D. Is a propertybased district, established in 2005 as one of the first c. B. D. S under article 15. The initial assessment budget was approximately 413,000 in fiscal year 20182019, and they submitted an assessment roll of approximately 516,000. The c. B. D. Is set to expire on june 30, 2020, unless renewed. The c. B. D. Was renewed in fiscal year 20192020. The executive director is here to present on the program attic achievements of the c. B. D. In this fis dal fiscal year. And district identity and streetscape improvements and corporate operations. Oewd reviews four bench marks for each c. B. D. And one, whether the variance was within 10er is Percentage Points from the Management Plan. And bench mark two, whether 5 of the actuals came from other than resource revenue. And three, whether the each Service Category is within 10er is Percentage Points from the actuals. And four, whether they are having funds carried over from the current fiscal year and designating projects for the upcoming year. For bench mark one, the c. B. D. Did not meet this requirement. Bench mark two, the c. B. D. Raised approximately 42 of its budget from non assessment revenue, so they did meet this requirement. For bench mark three, the c. B. D. Did meet this requirement. And for bench mark four, the c. B. D. Did meet this requirement. The castro upper market c. B. D. Has met all requirements and the c. B. D. Continues to perform well in respect to bench benchmark two with found aggression grants and donations throughout the year. And it implemented recommendations from the fiscal year 20172018 annual report. The c. G. Has worked with oewd to meet the bench marks to renew before the district expires and oewd will provide Technical Assistance to the c. B. D. To guide them through the renewal which they completed sceflly in 20192020. It has performed well in implementing the plan for the district and it continues to sceflly to market and successfully have increased opportunities in partnersing with the agencies for the implementation of castro cares and maintained an active board of directors and subcommittees. If theres no questions i would like to turn the presentation over. Good morning, supervisors, and thank you for all of the time and hours that you have put into helping the city to thrive. Im andrea ioalla, with the castro upper market benefit district. And i want to thank chris corgis, he is so helpful and has been so all these years, so helpful for us and all of the c. B. D. S and was critical in our scefl renew success successful renewal this year. This is our district map and many of you have seen this before and the c. B. D. Boundaries. Beginning in the east at octavia and Market Street and go up market to castro and downcast row to 19, and include the area where the Public Library is and the Health Center and it includes parts of church street, where safeway is to midway through 15th street. So its a very long and sprawling district map. Next, please. We have quite a few active committees we have an executive committee and a finance committee and streetscape and Identity Committee which is a beautification committee. And Landuse Committee and retail strategy committee. And a castro care lp team. And the Services Committee is the committee that oversees our cleaning and Public Safety services. Next slide, please. And the grants that we received in fiscal year 20182019 were all from oewd with the castro cares grant and to activate Jane Warner Plaza and to supplement some of the expenses related to the renewal. Next slide please, chris. Our cleaning services, we power wash on a regular basis, a lot more actually than mandated in our Management Plan because of the dmed demand and we remove graffiti from public and private spaces throughout the district. Next slide, please. And this is our cleaning up by the numbers for 018 20182019. About 60 tons of trash was picked up in fiscal year 20182019. Quite a lot of graffiti was removed and id like to bring your attention to the human waste incidents of human waste removed, 3,062 instances and 2,559 dirty needles collected. Next slide, please. We are also in contact with the San Francisco Patrol Special Police to provide and to supplement the Public Safety Services Provided by the sfpd. And we have we collaborate with many of the merchants and other neighborhood organizations to help to patrol the special police and they provide services seven nights a week in vehicle and foot patrols. Their focus really is in line with their direction from the Police Commission is to focus on quality of life issues and so they do combine Compassionate Care with enforcement and we do supplement their work with some funding from the castro cares grant to bring Additional Services to the neighborhood. Next slide please, chris. This is our street outreach worker. And this is through our castro cares grant. We had a contract with the San Francisco aids foundation and this gentleman worked through the aids foundation branch in the castro. And the outreach worker in 20182019 had a referral guide that he distributed to merchants, but also to people on the street. And provided a variety of services to unhoused individuals, about 306 unhoused individuals. Some of the highlights of those services were 64 health and Wellness Services and those are referrals and warm handoffs through the aids foundation. 26 related to Harm Reduction services, which is really around services to people who are have a Substance Use disorder and two to housing with the help of s. F. Hut and d. P. H. And one was given a ride home through the homeward bound program. Next slide, please, chris. As we said, we have a program called live in the castro which during the pandemic has been suspended, but this is Jane Warner Plaza and throughout 2018, 2019, we had live entertainment, concerts, readings, speeches in the Jane Warner Plaza throughout the warm nonrainy months. And i think that the next slide is the end, right . Next slide, thank you. Yeah, so if theres any questions im really happy to answer any questions. Supervisor mar thank you so much for the presentation and its all impressive work at the castro upper market c. B. D. Do you have any questions or remarks . Why dont we go to Public Comment mr. Clerk, any callers on the line . Clerk operations will check to see if we have any callers in the queue. Let us know if we have callers that are ready. For those who have already connected press star, 3, to be added to the queue to speak to this item. For hold in the queue please continue to wait until prompted to begin and you will hear that your line is unmuted. For those watching our meeting on cable channel 26, or through the website, you can call in by following the instructions on your screen. Dialing 1 415 6550001. And entering the meeting i. D. Of 1467063442. Press the pound symbol twice and then press star, followed by 3, to enter the queue to speak. Any callers for agenda item number 2 . Mr. Chair, there are no callers in the queue. Supervisor mar great, thank you. Public comment is now closed. I would like to move that we send this item to the full board with positive recommendation. Mr. Clerk, can you call roll. Clerk on the motion offered by chair mar that this resolution to be recommended to the full board of supervisors [roll call] mr. Chair, there are three as. Supervisor mar thank you. Thank you again. Thank you. Supervisor mar mr. Clerk, call item 3. Clerk yes, of course. Agenda item number 3 is a resolution receiving and approving an report for the noe valley Community Benefit district for fy20182019, submitted as required by the property and Business Improvement district law of 1994. Those who wish to speak on this item should press star and followed by 3 to line up to speak. Others who may be interested would begin by dialing 1 415 6550001. And entering todays meeting i. D. The 1467063442. Pressing the pound symbol twice to connect to the meeting. And then pressing the star key followed by the number 3 to enter the queue to speak. Mr. Chair . Supervisor mar thank you, mr. Clerk. Chris corgis, the floor is yours once again. Thank you, chair mar, and supervisors. Ill be sharing the screen once again. Set up . Supervisor mar yes. Fantastic. Good morning, supervisors. Were here for the fiscal year 20182019noe valley report and im with the office of economic and workforce development. All c. B. D. S are governed by two laws, the state law which is the 1994 act and the local law, article 5 of the business and tax regulations code. This resolution will cover the annual report for fiscal year 2082019, and oewd ensures they are meeting Management Plan and an annual review of reports and c. P. A. Financial reviews. And we provide a summary memo to the board of supervisors. The noe valley c. B. D. Was established in 2005, one of the first c. B. D. S after article 15s passage with a budget of approximately 230,000. In fiscal year 20182019 it had an assessment roll of 269,000. It was set to expire on june 30, 2020, but like the castro c. B. D. Was renewed in 20192020. And the executive director is Deborah Nieman here to present on the program of the c. B. D. And its streetscape improvements and administration and corporate operations. Oewd reviews four bench marks for all c. B. D. S. And the first is whether the variance for each Service Category is within 10 Percentage Points from the plan. And two, whether the 5 of the actuals came from sources other than assessment revenue. And bench mark 3, whether the budget amounts for each category is within 10 Percentage Points from the actuals. And four, whether the c. B. D. Is showing the funds carried over from the current year and designating projects in the upcoming year. For bench mark one, the c. B. D. Did not meet this requirement and it has historically not met this requirement due to the changes in city requirements on the c. B. D. Since its initial establishment and oewd believes that the new Management Plan which was renewed will address these structural issues and allow them to meet this bench mark going forward. For bench mark two, the c. B. D. Did meet this requirement with approximately 35 of their operating budget coming from nonassessment revenue. And for three, it did meet this requirement. And for bench mark four, the c. B. D. Did meet this requirement. In completing the review, oewd set forth the recommendations, that it would sun set in 2020 and begin the renewal process in 2018. The c. B. D. Did not meet bench mark one and has not met it due to structural weakness in the Management Plan. In order to correct this, the c. B. D. Would need to decrease the budget for the administrative and corporate operations by 1. 79 and enclose that percentage for public rights of way by the amount deducted from the previous category. Oewd as previously mentioned anticipates upon the renewal they will meet this requirement by upidating the plan appropriately. Although the c. B. D. Did not meet the one bench mark it has performed well in implementing the service plan, the board is active, and the c. B. D. Has sponsored events, including the noe valley town square. Oewd will work with the c. B. D. To ensure that it meets all bench marks going forward. If theres no questions i would like to turn it over to miss nieman. Hi. Am i on at this point . Supervisor mar yep. Okay, great. First of all to give a shout out to aaron peskin who started this 16 years ago and then a shout out then to give a shoutout to chris who is always by ouricide in terms of helping us to do our work and to give us the equipment that we need, especially during covid. Anytime that we call chris because were out of masks or gloves, somehow or another he comes up with the resources that are necessary, so were very grateful to him. And john carroll, i dont know how you do this but you do a great job of repeating all of these rules, so hats off to you too. Next slide. Our map is pretty simple. This is from our district. We discontinue the property up by douglas and 24th street because we just had the four commercial properties up there and there were a and the new laws state that wed have to join the properties between diamond and douglas which are primarily resident yal. And that did not seem worth the effort to do that for us. Next slide. And we have three active committees, the Green Committee and the streetscape improvements. I mean, i could go through a litany, you know of 28 benches and 40 bike racks and opening gardens and things of that nature. Next slide. And were very active in terms of trying to get people to the 24th street because noe valley is between two hills. And parking is limited. Its hard to get people to come to the commercial district. So we work with the noe merchant and professional association and the Farmers Market and we put on a number of events, primarily at the New Town Square which was formed about three years ago. Next slide. And these are just, you know, some of the events that we put on. And we have the park that is always a big hit. Next slide. And i already talked about this. So you have the professional Merchants Association which is a professional group. You have the friends of noe valley, that is resident yal. And then the noe valley town square. And the town square raised over half a Million Dollars from the residents and businesses in the district. And then we were able to raise the rest of the funds for the open space fund and working with s. F. Rec and park. We havent done much with them during covid but were starting to open it up for restaurants to use possibly during the day during the evening because the more that are put in front of restaurants on 24th street, that reduces the amount of parking and it gets a little more difficult to entice people to come. Next slide. And so oewd has been very good to us and we have seen the number of grants. And the fiscal agent for the noe valley town square and we activate this public space a loe events. Next slide. And you can see these numbers yourself, but we mostly remove a lot of trash from the sidewalk for people who moved out of apartments. And theyve certainly done that in the last six months. Weve had to remove a lot of it this year. And the only c. B. D. That screens our sidewalks 10 times a year. It was within our initial Management Plan and we continue in the renewal plan. And the best thing is to put a flower basket, because people love those. And we planted initially 135 trees and now have 229 that we take care of and we have two street porters and a parttime gardener. Next slide. Oh, so we didnt get to install it in noe valley town square. But we got rec and park, miracuously to put a bathroom behind the bulletin tin board in the town square. Next slide. And we always want to do murals because theres a lot of blank wall space but, again, during covid and in the Previous Year we were preoccupied with renewal. I think that is it. This is just for reference to show you what used to be there. So on my left is what used to be a parking lot and on my right is now the town square which is murals on bothicides. Its very activated and its a very busy part of the district. Next slide. I think that is it. There you go. Nice and easy. Any questions . Supervisor mar thank you very much for the presentation. Noe valley c. B. D. Is one of the more scefl c. B. D. S in our city. So thank you for the great work. Youre welcome. Okay . Supervisor mar cool colleagues, any questions or remarks . Clerk operations will check to see if theres callers in the queue. Let us know if theres any callers. If you have pressed star, 3, to speak to this item. For those already on hold in the queue continue to wait until you are prompted to begin. When you are prompted it informs you that your line is unmuted. For those watching on cable channel 26 or through the streaming link, if you wish to speak follow the instructions on your screen. By dialing 1 415 6550001 and the i. D. 1467063442. Any callers for agenda item number 3. Bl mr. Chair, no callers in the queue. Have a good day. Supervisor mar thank you. Public comment is closed. I move that we send this item to the full board with positive recommendation. Call roll, mr. Clerk. Clerk on the motion offered by chair mar that this be recommended to the full board of supervisors [roll call] mr. Chair, three as. Supervisor mar thank you, mr. Clerk. Do we have item number 4 on this is our final c. B. D. Presentation. Clerk we have it right here. Agenda number 4 is resolution receiving and approving an annual report for the ocean avenue Community Benefit district for fy20182019, submited as required by the property and Business Improvement district law of 1994 and the districts Management Agreement with the city. And if the public wishes to speak on this item, call the Public Comment number, 1 415 6550001. Enter the meeting i. D. Of 1467063442. And press the pound symbol twice to connect to the meeting and press the star key followed by 3 to execute to speak. The system prompt will indicate that you have raised your hand and wait until the system indicates that you are unmuted and thats your opportunity to provide comments. Mr. Chair . Supervisor mar thank you, mr. Clerk. Chris corgis to present again. Thank you once again, supervisors and i will make this as quick as possible. This is the fiscal year fy20182019 annual report for the ocean Avenue Community Business District and im chris corgis with the office of workforce and economic development. Its developed by state law, the 1994 act, and the article 5 of the business and tax regulations code. This resolution will cover the annual report for fy20182019 and oewd ensures they are meeting Management Plans and the staff has an annual review of the Financial Statements and oewd has a summary mental memo to the board of directors. It was established with a budget of approximately 239,000. In fiscal year 20182019 they had approximately 320,000. The district is currently set to expire on june 30, 2025. The executive director of the c. B. D. Is mr. Daniel weaver who is here to present on the Program Achievements of the c. B. D. And their service area are ambassadors, a cleaning program and administration and corporate operations. Oewd staff reviews the following benchmarks for all cbds. One, whether the budget amounts for each one is within 10 Percentage Points and two, whether one of one percent is from the revenues. And three, whether the budget amounts for each category is within 10 Percentage Points from the actuals. Bench mark four, whether its indicating the funds from the current year and designating the projects to be spent in the upcoming year. For one, the c. B. D. Met this requirement. For bench mark two, 18 of the operation came from unassessment revenue and they did meet this requirement. For bench mark three, the c. B. D. Did meet this requirement. And for bench mark four, the c. B. D. Did meet this requirement. Our findings and conclusions, ocean avenue c. B. D. S has performed well in implementing the plan for the district. They did implement our recommendations from the fiscal year 20172018 annual report. They partnered with the district 7 supervisor norman yee to have the first ocean avenue Lunar New Year celebration. Oewd believes that the c. B. D. Though could benefit from a review to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the organization to ensure that its operating at the highest capacity and to have outreach to determine the direction of the organization should it be renewed. Oewd believes that the organization should have a Strategic Plan to look at the short term and the midterm and the longterm needs of the district and to focus on ensuring the Management Structure is effective and including the board staff relationships and engaging the effectiveness of four c. B. D. Programs and to provide recommendations on how to be improved. And improving the c. B. D. s overall effectiveness and the respect in the broader ocean Avenue Community. And, four, identify the strategies to ensure the longterm Financial Stability of the organization, especially related to non assessment resources. The c. B. D. Has sought an early renewal and oewd say to explore the expansion avenues, up to the ocean avenue corridor that is incredibly diverse, including many cantonesespeaking businesses and the c. B. D. Should conduct outreach to those in multiple helpings. Although the c. B. D. Should be commended for efforts to provide outreach to money on lingual communities it should build on this with the renewal and expansion campaign. The oewd recommendations from the review to be specifically implemented in a future Management Plan for renewed and expanded districts. The c. B. D. Did have several subcommittees and they believe that the ocean avenue c. B. D. In general is a wellrun organization that will carry out its mission. If theres no questions for oewd, i would like to turn the presentation over to mr. Weaver. Supervisor mar that sounds good. Mr. Weaver . Mr. Weaver, are you there . Im seeing that dan weaver is connected to the call but not responsive at this time. Supervisor mar mr. Carroll, are you able to unmute him . Clerk im not able to. Hed have to unmute himself. Supervisor mar okay. There he is. Good morning, mr. Weaver. Clerk you have muted your microphone again. There we go. Try now. Im here. Clerk very good. We can hear you now. It looks like i need to keep my finger on the button, which i will do. [laughter] so, first of all, i would like to extend my thanks, like everyone else, and every c. B. D. To chris corgis for doing a remarkable job of keeping us all happy. And he should get a raise. [laughter] okay. This first slide is a picture of our landmark building, the timothy pluger theater which is currently undergoing rehabilitation to be, amongst other things, a theater some time in the future. This is a map of the current Community Benefits district. Next. We have two committees. The Street Life Committee which is focused on the activation of the Retail District through public art, entertainment and design. And the Business Committee which is concerned with Business Growth and retention within the district. Next. Our Partner Organizations from the non Profit Sector include western neighborhoods project, liveable city, o. M. I. , Cultural Participation projects and neighbors in action and the Park Association and the homes association. Next. Our partners in government include the oewd, public works, Planning Department and the Bay Area Rapid transit district, and the city college of San Francisco. Next. In 2018 to 2020, we have received a number we have applied for and received a number of grants. Let me quickly run through the purposes that were trying to achieve here and the grants. To provide Additional Services to our assessment payers as well as the surrounding community with grantfunded projects. To support our Small Businesses, to employ a coordinator, funded by a c. B. D. Grant. To understand the corridors aspects and difficulties, we are completing a public life study this year. To plan a possible c. B. D. Expansion, we have received an Organizational Support grant from oewd. To improve the Small Business facades we have also applied for and received for in a number of fiscal years there are a few fiscal years, f. S. Shine grants. Next. Our main projects are main activities in terms of funding is cleaning, maintenance and safety. Clean scapes provides our cleaning. They come six days a week and they are constantly sweeping the sidewalks and the gutters, removing graffiti and providing cleaning, steam cleaning. And now arborists maintain the trees on or near ocean avenue. And in the past two or three years we have had to provide additional cleaning and maintenance to the various grooming spaces that we have creteed within the district. We are continually adding to the cost of cleaning, maintenance and safety because were continuing were providing more spaces to maintain. But thats what everyone likes the most is actually seeing our district becoming more green and more attractive. Next. Heres that subject, maintain the sidewalk gardens on ocean avenue and on perpen dick icide streets. And out utilize the neighborhoods for garden maintenance. And we also at our meetings the attendees and Board Members are asked what theyd like to see done in terms of neighborhood beautification and also business support. And to maintain in an area close to the 280 freeway ramps at the corner of ocean and geneva three different green spaces which have been established since 2017. O. A. A. Organized second sundays, a music event series held in Small Businesses and community spaces. Beginning in 2018, o. A. A. Staff organized events in unity plaza and having a monthly popup Crafts Market with live music. Next. This is one of our most successful projects which is an event sponsored by a high school. And the youth art exchange. And this is the picture of unity plaza fully engaged with people. Next. Some of our challenges, which seem to go from year to year, although theyre particularly unique this pandemic time, a couple years ago we were looking at high rents and design challenged business spaces which have led sometimes to longterm vacancies, Property Owners and Business Owners underinvest in their store fronts and giving some this experience. And Prospective Development projects, sometimes are positioned to displace longterm businesses and not allow them to come back but instead replacing the historic ground for retail spaces on ocean avenue with something else. Often an office or a medical facility. Next. Opportunities theres a high interest in the neighborhood for public art and music events and entertainment. O. A. A. Is working with the free events and installing new public art work on the corridor. And new businesses establishing on ocean avenue bring the potential for Business Owners to participate in advow indicating for the ocean Avenue Community. And the Development Projects have the potential to provide new retail spaces in a variety of locations. Our ideas in the future are programs at unity plaza and to have the park area and other transit yards and public lands. And this pursuit is leading us to an early reauthorization in order to bring into our district, if possible, the park station and the adjoining muni green facility as well. Were aiming to successfully raise funding for the gateway at the library which is now succeeded. We have raised that money. Development for the projects in the o. A. A. Plan for the c. B. D. Corridor that folk ises on the sfmta transit station around the park station. Add here when we talk to people about whats wrong with walking or bicycling to the batter station in bart station instead of driving, almost uniformly people say that its a bad walk, its scary, its filled can cars and trucks. Streetcars and buses. And pe destians dont have much of a chance. So this is the reason for focusing on the bart station and the other transit facilities around the bart station. Next. Theres the theater in the background. To give you a perspective. Supervisor mar thank you so much, mr. Weaver, for the presentation and for all of your work with the ocean avenue c. B. D. And i would say that its great to see a successful c. B. D. On the west side of the city and im in your neighborhood a little bit more often than the other three c. B. D. S that were highlighted in the previous item. And i really do appreciate all of the public art and the activation events that you are doing out there. I just have a question around one of mr. Corgi ds s recommendations is that you looked at how to develop a plan to outreach and engage with chinese merchants on ocean avenue a little bit more. And i was wondering, i didnt really see that highlighted in your, you know, your presentation. So i was wondering if like what you are doing, the c. B. D. Is doing to engage with the Chinese Businesses which are still significant proportion. Mr. Weaver, youre muted again. I think youre good. Clerk if you could just hold down that button, please. There we go. Can you hear me . Clerk we can hear you now. Thats straifnlg strange. Involving chinese merchants, in a number of them involved in creteing the c. B. D. S and they are happy because we focused on what the needs were as we built it. But in terms of the expansion, we are trying to figure out particularly in terms of the area along ocean avenue to the west, to work with the Chinese Business people, all business people, and were going to utilize all of our information sheets and questionnaires and our people who walk around are going to use people who use chinese to try to engage them and to find out what they are interested in. So that is basically that effort to expand the c. B. D. Focused on talking to homeowners as well or the renters as well as Business Owners in that additional area. Supervisor mar thank you. How are you engaging with the money on lingual mono ds lingual speaking merchants on ocean avenue . Do you have folks that are part of the ocean avenue c. B. D. That can speak to them and communicate to them directly . We have i think three or foud members who speak chinese. And we engage them when necessary to talk to their fellows about the issues concerning the business or the c. B. D. Or anything that comes up that is an issue for us. Or for the merchants. Thank you for that. Thank you for all of your good work. Colleagues, unless you have any questions, maybe we can move to Public Comment on this item. Clerk thank you, mr. Chair. Theres a question. No. Clerk okay. Operations will check to see if theres callers in the queue. Let us know if there are any callers ready. For those connected to our meeting by phone press star followed by 3 to be added to the queue to speak to this item. In hold in the queue, wait until you are prompted to begin. You will hear a prompt informing you that your line is unmuted. For those watching on cable channel 26 or by streaming listening or through the website, call in now by following the strkdzs on instructions on your screen, by dialing 1 415 6550001. Enter the meeting i. D. Of 1467063442. Press the pound symbol twice and then press star, followed by 3 to get in the queue to speak. Any callers for agenda item number 4 . Mr. Chair, there are no callers in the queue. Clerk . Supervisor mar great. Thank you. Public comment is closed. I move that we send this to the full board with positive recommendations. Mr. Clerk, please call roll. Clerk on the motion offered by chair mar that this be recommended to the board of supervisors [roll call] mr. Chair, three as. Supervisor mar thank you again, mr. Weaver. And, of course, thank you to mrd work on this. Thank you. Mr. Clerk, call item 5. Clerk yes, of course. Agenda item number 5 is a resolution authorizing the Fire Department to donate a retired ambulance to the city college of San Franciscos Emergency Medical Services academy. Members of the public to provide Public Comment should call the number which is still 1 415 6550001. Enter the meeting i. D. Of 1467063442. Press the pound symbol twice to connect to the meeting and then press the star key followed by the number 3 to enter the queue to speak. And the prompt will indicate that you have raised your hand and wait until you have been unmuted and that will be your opportunity to give Public Comment and once Public Comment is called. Mr. Chair . Supervisor mar thank you, mr. Clerk. I would like to welcome mr. Mark corso who will speak on this item on behalf of the San Francisco Fire Department. Welcome. Thank you, good morning, mr. Chair, and members of the committee. Mark corso from the Fire Department to speak to the donation of a surplus ambulance to city college of San Francisco for the e. M. S. Academy. The Fire Department has a great relationship with city college including instructor Service Agreement with them and we have worked with them in the past and were supportingers of the academy. They have the use of a surplus ambulance for a tool and prop for those going through the academy. Theres a surplus ambulance that has no longer use in the Fire Department for these donation purposes. And this ambulance would only be used for instructional purposes. This donation would strengthen our relationship with city college and be able to reuse surplus equipment. So i thank you on behalf of the department for your consideration of the item and i am happy to answer any questions that you may have. Supervisor mar thank you to the Fire Department for this donation to support the Emergency Services training at city college. Workforce Training Programs like these are essential to empower working people with the skills and jobs and to provide a pipeline to essential Services Like Emergency Medical Services. On which this pandemic has shown to be so truly essential. So thank you, again. And id be happy to sponsor this item. Clerk mr. Chair indiscernible . Supervisor mar colleagues, any questions or remarks before we go to Public Comment . Mr. Clerk, any callers on the line . Clerk operations is checking to see if theres callers in the queue. Let us know if we have callers that are ready. I will repeat the instructions. For those who have already connected via phone press star 3 to be added to the queue. For those already on hold in the queue, please continue to wait until you are prompted to begin. You will hear prompts that inform you that your line is unmuted. For those watching on cable channel 26 or streaming listening, if you wish to speak on this item, please call in by following the instructions on your screen. That would be by dialing 1 415 6550001. And enter the meeting i. D. Of 1467063442. Press the pound symbol twice. And then press star, followed by 3, to enter the queue to speak. Any callers who wish to speak on agenda five . Mr. Chair, there are no callers in the queue. Supervisor mar great, thank you. Our Public Comment is now closed on this item. We will move this to the full board with a positive recommendation. Mr. Clerk, can you please call roll. Clerk on the motion offered by chair mar that this be recommended to the board of supervisors [roll call] mr. Chair, there are three as. A ds ayes. Please call item 6. Agenda 6 is an ordinance to require notification to prequalified contractors and written documentation of contractor selection from prequalified theirses and written documentation of contractor selection for work assigned under asneeded public works professional Services Contracts and to require the controller to audit such selection documentation. To give Public Comment, call 1 415 6550001. Is code is 1467063442. Wait until you have been unmuted and thats your opportunity to provide comments on agenda item number 6. Supervisor mar thank you, mr. Clerk. Welcome supervisor stefani. Would you like to make remarks. Supervisor stefani thank you for scheduling this today. And through the chair i request a continuance to the next meeting because we is have an amendment with the City Attorney office and i want to thank the committee for their patience while we work out the details with this legislation and the amendment. If you would like me to go through the legislation now, fine. But if you would like to wait until i have the amendment ready, that would be fine too. So its whatever you would prefer that i do. But i do request a continuousance to the next meeting, please. Supervisor mar yes, thank you. And given the length of this committee agenda, perhaps we could go with the second option that you mentioned and hold off on, you know, your presentation on it until your amendments are presented. Supervisor stefani thats what i assumed. I was ready either way but thank you for that, chair mar. Supervisor mar thank you, supervisor stefani. Colleagues, unless you have any questions about this item or comments, we could go to Public Comment. Mr. Clerk. Clerk operations is checking to see if we have callers in the queue. Let us know if we have callers ready. If you have already connected press star, 3, to be added to the queue to speak on this item. For those on hold in the queue, please continue to wait until you are prompted to begin and you will hear a prompt and you will be told that your line is unmuted. On cable channel 26 or through the livestream and you wish to speak follow the instructions on your screen. That would be by dialing 1 415 6550001. And enter todays meeting i. D. That is 1467063442. Press the pound symbol twice and press star, followed by 3 to enter the queue to speak. Let us know if we have callers for agenda 6. Mr. Chair, there are no callers in the queue. Supervisor mar thank you. Public comment is now closed. Thank you, supervisor stefani. We will look forward to a full discussion on this important ordinance at the next meeting. Colleagues, i move that we continue this item to october 1 meeting. Mr. Clerk, please call roll. Clerk on the motion offered by chair mar to continue to the october 1st regular meeting [roll call] mr. Chair, there are three ayes. Supervisor safai thank you, colleagues. Supervisor mar mr. Clerk, call item actually i would like to note that item 7 was scheduled as a special order item for 11 00 a. M. , but given that its already 11 15, yeah, were going to just move ahead with it. So please call item 7. Clerk yes. Agenda item 7 is a resolution urging the city and county of San Francisco to expand the definition of vulnerable populations for services for people experiencing homelessness during the covid19 crisis. The members of the public to provide comment on this resolution should call the number which is still 1 415 6550001. And enter the meeting i. D. Which is 1467063442. Press the pound symbol twice to connect to the meeting and press star followed by a 3 to enter the queue to speak. Wait until the system indicates that you have been unmuted and you may then begin your comments on agenda item number 7. Mr. Chair . Supervisor mar thank you, mr. Clerk. I would like to welcome supervisor peskin sorry, preston. Thank you for sponsoring this item and the floor is yours. Supervisor preston thank you so much, chair mar. And i just want to thank you and the committee for getting this on your calendar. This as well as the next item that we have on the agenda, also something that i am sponsoring. And i know that you have a full agenda today as well as quite a backlog because of the budget season. So i really appreciate you making time for this today. So, colleagues, this resolution urges the city to expand the definition of vulnerable populations to include people who are under 60 years old, but are homeless. Our Public Health department defines vulnerable populations using an age limit that does not distinguish between the people who are housed and people who are unhoused. And the premise of our resolution is that this should be reconsidered going forward, given that those on the streets age more rapidly than folks who are housed. This is not just a theoretical exercise. When it comes to eligibility for services, including hoe telerooms for people hotel rooms for those during the covid19 crisis, being considered vulnerable or not vulnerable is the key criteria in determining what is offered to that and available to that individual. Its now been 26 weeks since shelterinplace began. We have thousands of san franciscans continues continuing to sleep outside without the ability to shelter at home. And to this day, colleagues, despite our advocacy and our unanimous legislation of the board, despite our pleas to the administration, to more boldly to address our homelessness crisis, thousands remain on the streets. One thing that we have all agreed on at least in theory from the early stages of this Public Health crisis is that the necessity to shelter our most vulnerable san franciscans to prevent the spread of covid19. If we look back to march 9th in a press release with the mayor and the Public Health department and the Emergency Operation center, our department of healtr grant colfax is that our chief concern is for vulnerable populations that are most at risk of getting very sick or dying if they get covid19. And he continued, that is why we are recommending that people over 60 or with certain Underlying Health conditions stay home as much as possible. So, clearly, the folks housed or unhoused over 60 are deemed vulnerable by the department of Public Health. Furthermore, after extensive advocacy, we received assurances back in april from the director of h. S. A. That vulnerable Homeless People, whether on streets or in shelters, would be moved into hoe telerooms ho ds tel rooms. Something that we have not lived up to. And so this addresses the simple but the key issue how do we define who is and who is not vulnerable . And why do we use the same criteria when it comes to age for those housed and those unhoused . We urge the city to have a broader definition, 45 or above when it comes to unhoused san franciscans. You know, looking forward to hearing i know that theres brief presentations from departments, but, you know, some of the data is clear. According to the last point in time count, 35 of those experiencing homelessness are over the age of 51. 74 of those experiencing homelessness have one or more Health Conditions. In one of the richest cities in the world, 275 unhoused people died last year. And the c. D. C. , which had initially primarily warned of increased covid risks for those over 65, now warns that among adults that risk increases steadily as you age. Its not just those over the age of 65 who are at increased risk for severe illness. The despite the emergency ordinance that i referenced before urging the city to house all Homeless People in hoe teles, the city has limited efforts to those who meet this criteria of being vulnerable. And the citys definition as i understand it and d. P. H. Will explain further, is that it applies to people who are 60 years or older or have an Underlying Health condition. I want to be clear, this means if you are 58 years old and you are living on the street and you do not have certain specified medical conditions that you are deemed not to be a person vulnerable to covid19 and you will not be eligible for a shelterinplace hotel room. This is not consistent with the research on geriatric homelessness and aging. So it shows that homeless adults have medical ages that far exceed their biological age. According to research, by a professor of medicine at General Hospital and director of the ucff center for vulnerable populations, people experiencing homelessness have geriatric conditions and functional impairments at a higher prefer lance than that seen in housed adults who are 20 years older. Based on that and other Research Showing the folks who are unhoused age at a rate on par with individuals 20 years older, our resolution urges the city and the department of Public Health, h. S. H. , and h. S. A. To expand the definition of Vulnerable Persons to include those who are 45 years or older for purposes of hotel eligibility and any other covid19 related services that are currently limited to vulnerable populations. I want to thank jen snyder and afry yu in my office for their work on this resolution. I want to thank my early cosponsors, ronnen and walton and haney and also all of the homeless advow indicates working every day to help those unhoused in this pandemic. So i have asked d. P. H. And h. S. H. To each speak briefly if thats okay with the with you, mr. Chair. And i understand that d. P. H. Has a short power ds power point presentation and both are available for questions. Thank you. Supervisor mar thank you, supervisor preston. We could go into the presentations right now. Hi, i am deb borne, and im in a room alone and im taking off my mask because its safe. I am a physician and my role is that i oversee the Health Policy for people experiencing homelessness. In my now night job, i take care of people that live on the street and im part of the street Medicine Team. I actually work in district 5 and i live there as well and i have the distinguished pleasure of just turning 65 this year. So from that place of experience im interested in talking to you about these measures. So next slide. Thanks. So first of all, what are the shelterinplace hotels. Its part of a multipronged approach that were at the initial part of the epidemic, where were trying to decrease the risk of the spread and the risk for people that have a high impact to covid. So we opened up shelters in place hoe teles like many areas across the country and theyre indoors, in hotels that are commercial hotels, people have their own bathrooms and theres medical and Behavioral Health and Harm Reduction onsite. People have to follow rules and its not free to be you and me and they have to mask and social distance and theres strict egress as well. So why the hotels . To decrease the risk of becoming infected with covid that could have a bad outcome and die. And they are designed to decrease the outcome that would be with hospitals because we know that hospitalizations and i. C. U. Stays impact all of us and increase the risk for San Francisco, which is why its one of the indicators that we have on the state and national level. So we prioritize. At first we prioritized people in shelters so as we have those individuals that met the risk for covid. And we prioritized hospitals and the homeless street medicine to work to identify individuals every day. Next slide, please. So what is the most vulnerable . And to levels for all of us. I have done this for 30 years and i reviewed some cases. And i wanted to make sure that its all clear that we say covid vulnerable is different from what is being vulnerable on the street. On the street its someone with a Mental Health or other issues who is an unaccompanied woman or minor or lgbtq. And those are things that make us vulnerable on the street. Thats disifnt from different from what covid does to someones body and what makes you covid vulnerable. And covid wont care if we get it right or wrong, but we do have to get it right on who covid will affect. Thats who we need to look at. So what you see on your screen right now, the green, is the current c. D. C. Guidance for who is at risk for data from covid, and for hospitalization and for death. And originally it was 65 and now theyre saying they have a gradation system but the illnesses theirsed here, a lot are driven by a high body mass index. You can see that type 2 diabetes is on there and not type one. Some of the ones originally are not on there currently. What you see in the blue is what the department of Public Health has looked at and taken from them from the might be at risk category to i kind of lead out and operationalize the criteria. From the beginning we used 60 and ill get to that in the next slide but i want to talk about the medical conditions. What we have added and this is not on the highrisk definition, meaning that it is not reimbursed by fema. Uncontrolled h. I. V. And people with uncontrolled h. I. V. And with counts of 200 or a detectable viral load and pregnancy is on and off the high risk and we keep that in for San Francisco. And diseases that makes you immune compromised because you cant make proteins to fight illnesses and oxygen dependent. This is different than what will cause the risk of death not from covid. Theres been four cases of syphilis since the epidemic started and this is what i did before covid. That person at risk, its not the systemic cause of that risk from covid. I want to make a comment about margos research. I talked to her yesterday and shes my friend can colleague for over 20 years. And i reviewed with her how thit misinterpreted. So it was based on the fact that the jority of the people that you see in the community have medical illnesses and its because of those medical illnesses and the inability to care for them when you are in survival mode or on the street or being moved frequently from place to place, to be able to take your medicine and to be well. So she truly believes that its not actually just being homeless alone, but that it actually is the medical conditions accompanied. So this is slightly a misinterpretation of what and what her research is showing. Ill go to the next stage and talk about age and maybe answer questions there. Supervisor mar could i jump in a second before you do, through the chair. Just if you can go back a slide. Can you my understanding so the interpretation of this slide is that theres certain conditions that have one viewed as increased risk of covid under the fema regime and the c. D. C. Theirs and that the department of Public Health and the city and county of San Francisco has added these six additional criteria, suggesting i think that the definition of vulnerable in terms of Health Conditions is broader under San Francisco no. Is that correct . No, sorry. Thank you for the clarification, i really appreciate it. So this is these medical conditions put you at risk for a death or morbidity or mortality from covid. The ones on the right are based on data. So the data is not great around the world on which illnesses that requires reporting, etc. So we really dont know. And from what the c. D. C. Reported, for example, the immune compromised state with solid organ transplants, but when you dive deeper into the research, people who have no immune system or tcells from uncontrolled h. I. V. , this is coming from fauci and i think that he knows a lot are at greater risk. This is deeper diving into the data from the c. D. C. This is the current c. D. C. Covid vulnerability criteria and thats a disifnt thing what people different thing that fema is reimbursing. This is based on San Francisco experience for the covidrelated outcomes that we have had. And not necessarily based on someone who is street or otherwise medically vulnerable. Okay, setting aside reimbursement and fema issues, in terms of comparing the c. D. C. Definition of vulnerable Health Conditions or Health Conditions that render one of increased vulnerability, versus what we use at the city level i think that this is very important my understanding is that under the c. D. C. Definition that there are a number of conditions that are deemed to make one of increased susceptibility to covid, but are not covered under San Franciscos definition. And those are include maybe there are more but it includes cancer, severe and moderate asthma, and hypertension or high Blood Pressure and Liver Disease and smoking and other conditions. So do i have that right, that our definition of vulnerability is narrower than the c. D. C. When it comes to health . No. Im sorry, theres a slide further on and you can use it for your reference that can clarify this. The c. D. C. Took and broke down their categorizing, instead of having these are the vulnerable, they said these are increased risk, we have good data, this is what we know. And maybe we might be at risk. So they have an increased risk its at the end of the slide and you might be at risk. The illnesses that you theirss are you theirsed is at the listed is might be at risk. And its a state that we include on the blue side. So people with a bone Marrow Transplant and people in chemotherapy, and people with uncontrolled h. I. V. Are in an immunecompromised state, but the evidence shows, data shows, that they are higher than might be and they will probably get moved to the increased risk. So we looked at the data in the might be at risk group and said who do these people that we think that the data and the evidence is compelling enough that it should propel us to put them in the criteria theirs . Does that make sense . So theres a might be at risk and we looked at the the day data of who might at risk and which groups need to be in our criteria and thats how we came up with the medical illnesses, regardless of fema reimbursement. Thank you. I dont want to belabor it and let you to move on, but just so were clear, there are might be at risk category, under c. D. C. Guidelines. And then the department of Public Health has selected some of those based on data for which people may be eligible for hoe teles and being vulnerables. And theres others that might have injury and death and so forth from covid19 but who are not. So the department is exercising discretion based on the data to deem some of those c. D. C. Might be at risk criteria as making people vulnerable in San Francisco and others not, right . Yes. And if the data changes we would change the theirs. For sure the list for sure. And these are all very difficult. And when im the clinician advocating for someone who is a paraplegic and they have this, and its very difficult. So we really we have few resources and these are Public Health decisions that we have to make in order to help the most people with the resources that we have. And those c. D. C. Chose 65 originally, in San Francisco 86 of the deaths in San Francisco are aged 60 and above. And 51 of all of the deaths in San Francisco, regard regarding was housing, is 81 and above. The higher you get the higher the risk that you have regardless of your Underlying Health conditions. And 5 of all of the deaths are in the group of 6070, so the higher that you see with the picture on the right, so were seeing the deaths in our city at the higher theres only a few that are housed or not housed that are 40 to 47. And 1 of the deaths are individuals identified as homeless and we think that person died of another illness and 3 of the cases in San Francisco with covid are people who are currently homeless from our current data. This looked like a doctor slide but ill take you through what this is meaning and its looking at national and International Data that has come to us and why we made the 60 decision and why well want to keep that. So if you look to the right, these are two graphs and on the bottom of the slide, from china and korea and italy early on in the emdemmic that, once you get to 6069, you see the growth of the curve is exponentially increased. So an individual from that, not the numbers but the rate of chaism, is why we have chose this as the point. The data is consistent. The bottom picture on the right is the United Kingdom and new york city that you see at 65 increases. In the blue, just to take you te access is the years. This is by log and key value is how much deviation and the broader definition is meaning that this is definitely more accurate there. But if you look at 6069 you get a 2 cut. And theres a huge drop between 50 and 69. So why that group might be at risk . Or higher risk . This is why the c. D. C. Said that theres a gradation but when you look at it from a Public Health standpoint, San Francisco has decided that 60, because of the disirches, because of the the disirches is that this is the best for San Francisco. If you have an individual, you have an individual that is 60 years old and has no other illnesses, theyre at less risk than an 80yearold. And less risk than a upon 70yearold with diabetes. So we want to get the people at most risk and with a medical diagnosis. Ill turn it over to suesy next to talk about the fema reimbursement. Good morning, everybody. Can everybody hear me. Susie smith from the Human Services agency. I have the last exciting piece to present on fema, what is reimbursable and the cost estimate with the proposal to lower the eligibility age to 45. I actually worked with the Controllers Office and they actually did the Data Analysis on the cost and the reimbursability but the person had another matter at this time that they couldnt get out of, so im presenting on behalf of the Controllers Office. So in terms of the issues with what fema will reimburse and by how much, for covid19 pandemic, feel fema covers up to 75 of all eligible costs and ill go over eligibility in a moment and the city local cost share is 25 . There are three fema eligible populations for the hoe hotels. One is people who are diagnosed with covid and do not require hospitalization and people exiting out of the hospitals. Second, people who are exposed to covid, so close contacts, and do not require hospitalization, but we want to isolate and quarantine them. And, three, the group that were talking about today, are people who are not symptomatic but they are high risk if they got the disease for severe acuity and potential death should they contract covid. And four but that population fema, while the c. D. C. Recognizes that people over 60 are at high risk, fema only covers the cost for people over 65. They also cover the costs again, this is a 75 share, with people with certain Underlying Health conditions. And another piece to note is that the city has to obtain preapproval of femas continued support for any shelter, like hoe teles, hotels, every 30 days and were putting owfers ourselves at risk because they can end the support with 30 days notice. For the cost protections that we have done, the Controllers Office has assumed that the federal state emergency will continue through this fiscal year and that fema will, in fact, continue to support the hotels throughout that time but theres a lot of unpredictability with the federal government and theres not a guarantee of that commitment. So i wanted to note those pieces. And then we can move on to the cost estimates for the expansion. Its costing about 180 million this fiscal year. And if we expanded to the population between the ages of 45 and 59, according to the most recent point in time counts, that would be an additional about 3,000 people experiencing homelessness who would be eligible for the hotels. So if we lowered the age to 45, we need to do a combination of entering into the new hotel agreements, to significantly expand our capacity, of course, coupled with placing newel new really eligible people to existing units as they become available. So the Controllers Office estimates that the range could be an additional 250 million to 495 million. And extend the occupancy of the hotel sites into fy20222023. And the actual cost would depend on the mix of how many were able to put people in in the existing units with the need to acquire Additional Hotels and units. Secondly, that the city is able to exit clients into alternative housing and shelter placements. That assumes that we maintain our cost levels and, again, no fema reimbursement because the population would not be eligible for reimbursement. So that covers the financial piece. And before we move on to any questions, certain summary d. P. H. , h. A. H. , and the Controllers Office and the m. B. O. H. S. A. , we have been working handinhand in this response in a way that is unprecedented for the city coordination, to be honest. And we have been work working tirelessly to upthe day the most uptodate data on which populations really are getting sick and dying of covid. Again, the Financial Risks of further expanding to nonfema eligibility at a time when, of course, we have an unprecedented city deficit. So the Health Department has helped us to prioritize the most at risk of acute illness and dying as dr. Borne had shared based on the best data that we have available. Well continue to tweak that definition. And, you know, none of the work is without constant challenges but we can say that the data, our early choices around expanding eligibility beyond femas definition have born out that we prioritize decisions that have, in fact, saved lives. And we are happy i know that theres others on the line, but were happy to answer any questions that you may have. Supervisor mar thank you. If i could just followup, just back to dr. Borne for a second with d. P. H. I just want to go back to your point in relaying of your conversation with dr. Cru ds crushell, though its not good to have second or thirdhand conversations, but i want to understand your position here. I understand the argument that people who are unhoused and under 60, but who have specified conditions are at higher risk. I do understand though for the people that do not have those conditions, is it your position setting aside issues of the limited, you know, limits on the supply of units, just from a health perspective, is it your position that someone who is 55 years old and unhoused, is that the same risk if they dont have one of these specified conditions, theyre at the same risk as someone who lives near ds by who is 65 or who is 62 and is housed. Or even at the same age and housed. Lets use the same age. Because that doesnt make a lot of sense to me and its not consistent with my interpretation of the research or the other research that we have reviewed. There are stresses on one living on the street that cause one to age whether or not that results in someone having diabetes or one of the specified conditions. Can you just clarify what the position is take two 55 year olds and one housed and one unhoused and each lacking the specified conditions. Are you saying that theyre at the same risk . This is a great question and im going to try to clarify it with three disifnt points and im 55 so i can use myself as an example. Okay, so a lot is driven by the data, and the average age of death was 42 in San Francisco. Im going to a memorial for a dear patient who passed away who are 32, those are not related to medical, its due to the stress on the street. Its hard we have to get our brain around that has nothing to do with covid but it has to do with disease. And then you have covid, and for covid for 55, i at 55 have a higher without diabetes, obesity, and the other conditions, that would put me at risk for this. And as a Health Provider we have risk because repeated exposure might be a condition, and how youre exposed and put you more at risk so theres some of those things in there too. But an individual just 55 alone, has less risk than someone who is 65. Has less risk than someone who is 75 and less risk than someone who is 80 and we think its because of the things that happen to us as we age with this. And so when the flu season comes and the flu or the spanish flu, those flus hit younger folks, its actually the way that the disease works. Its not the disease itself that does it, its our physiological response to the illness and our body trying to do something with the illness. So the question about age and how you age. How you age from the stress and from life, and if youre living as in a yurt and eating unpasteurized yogurt, those are a whole area of science and research in what does and doesnt age us. We dont have good evidence. Margos data doesnt look at that and it doesnt say what happens to you physiologically when you age and if that age from stress, whether its internal stress or Behavioral Health, or people, you know, with severe Mental Illness that have a lot of internal stress that causes increased court cortizol, and those things that happen, we dont know if that impacts on covid. Does that make sense . So when youre in a stress response, what happens to you is that you have chronic cortizol, and it drops your immune system. But we dont have good data. What were seeing with the Health Providers that have a higher rate in italy and poor outcomes is because of their cortisol response and they think that what we were seeing was 5 or something high like that, and if it was actually because of how they were exposed. So we cant answer that question. And i can say in this middle group that im describing, margos data and i am third party but i literally spoke to her on the phone and shes my friend and colleague and we talk about our research and data all the time. And that her data was not talking about what happens to you as you age and does the aging process is the age process set up and thats why you have that outcome. We just see that with h. I. V. , for example. If you have h. I. V. , and youre 65, your heart condition looks like someone who is 65. Because of the physiological mechanism of h. I. V. We understand that. Does that make sense . What we dont understand is what happens with stress. So we dont actually know what happens with stress with the age response in particular to homelessness and the age response with covid. So i that was a longwinded question, this is what happens when you ask a doctor something. But death is higher for those with homelessness, 55, housed or not housed, and the increase with the data that i showed you and is margos data saying that home homeless alone is aging us and increasing the morbidity and mortality . No, and we cant make those conclusions. But i do hope a stress response and Trauma Informed Care and how that impacts, is my area of research and im interested in this. But we cant answer that question. Im helping you and im trying to help you one of the things is that we have been working together unprecedented and i want to work with all of you to help all of San Francisco to make the best decisions. I really do. And i want everyone on the street to get inside. I dont want to see the suffering. But i literally see it every day and i see in your district as i work there. But that is not the covid question. Covid doesnt have a heart and compassion like all of us here in San Francisco do. Covid is going to affect a body and a physiological system in a particular way and thats what this data is. 45 to 60, the evidence is not enough to say to open up the flood gates because what will happen is that a 45yearold with no other medical illnesses is going to get a room and limited resources, because there are limited resources. So, you know, if this was bill gates and suddenly gave us a room for everyone, sure, but thats not what is happening. I have been trying very much to separate the policy decisions that the board has engaged in around the supply of rooms from this discussion around health. So i appreciate your comments and i think that, you know, a fair statement of where we are certainly at least with how this supervisor looks at it is that we have consensus that as you age your vulnerability to covid19 increases. We have i believe from all of the data and research that ive seen, that we have we have plenty of support for the idea that one ages faster on the street when they live on the street due to a lot of the factors that you have talked about and then its the connection between those two that the department it sounds like is agnostic on and saying that those two things dont necessarily mean that one is by nature of being on the street somehow at higher risk to covid. So i think that is a fair characterization of where we are. You know, i believe one plus one equals two there. And there may be some disagreement on that. I do want to just give just a quick question or two over to miss snyder from h. S. H. And then and then try to wrap up my questions. I know that the Committee Members may have questions as well. Miss snyder, and through the chair, i just wanted to ask you if you could clarify around the the actual outreach and vetting for vulnerability and this is something, you know, that i think that we have discussed before or sent questions on this issue before the hearing. Were trying to just ascertain for the people, how many people are currently on the street and what percentage of them have been have there been outreach to and a determination of whether they meet the vulnerability i have tearia of criteria laid out by the department of Public Health. Sure, through the chair, thank you, supervisor preston. I will try to keep this brief because i know that we need to move on. But i do really appreciate your office sending these questions over in advance and we have done a lot of thinking about them so i wanted to provide a little bit of landscape on this. I think that its an excellent and a challenging question at any point in time to say how many people are on the street, how many of those people are vulnerable, and we say vulnerable from our precovid definition and covid vulnerable in our covid world. And how many people are we capturing in our systems and outreach. Not everyone who outreach interacts with is going to want to enter our system and so we have a few different kind of current interactions and strategies that id like to share with all of you. But, first, what i would like to do is to just talk about it in terms of data that tells us how many people are experiencing homelessness in San Francisco at any one time. We often go back to that point in time count, that every other year count with the National Best standard because it gives us a standard methodology both in the number of people experiencing homelessness as well as the demographics that we can measure across time. We know that homelessness itself is an experience so there are people exiting and entering homelessness on a daily and annual basis, which is why we use that standardized methodology over time. You have quoted some of this, but the 2019 head count had about 8,000 people experiencing homelessness or in temporary shelter and unsheltered. 65 of which were unsheltered, about 5,000. I know that our data team go a little bit further and dig in, 800 of those people experiencing homelessness were over the age of 60. And about 3,000 were between the ages of 45 to 59. Now what weigh know from the count and this is all selfreported by those that were serving, is that about 31 of the respondents recorded having a Chronic Health problem. Now we have just spent a lot of time on this definitions on what Chronic Health and medical vulnerabilities are and this is the broader definition that the count uses as well as coordinated entry. And its not covid informed. So when i say 31 , thats one of the percentages that we use when we make estimations about how can we look at who might be vulnerable for multiple reasons. But that is not necessarily tied directly to who might be at higher risk of covid vulnerability. Ill move along. The other point in time count that we can make on who is on our streets right now experiencing homelessness is the quarterly head count. Excuse me. That is the healthy streets operation center, and the quarterly count where they count vehicles and structures in San Francisco. And as of july that number was 1,806 structures. So as we know that we know that there are people on the streets that have varying levels of vulnerability. And is that precovid vulnerability and the high risk to covid vulnerability. So your question is really about outreach and how we are interacting with and capturing the folks that are on the streets. So the San Francisco Homeless Outreach team their mission, again, precovid was to work to engage and stabilize the most vulnerable homeless individuals. Again, those are the individuals that have Chronic Health problems and that are have severe illness and Mental Illness and Substance Abuse and lgbtq etc. And they work with these individuals on a casebycase basis to make sure theyre available to resources, particularly shelter and housing. And so two things on that we have trained the hot teams at every one of the hot teams is able to offer to enroll anyone that theyre engaging with in the one system. So that means a brief data capture that puts them into the one system so we can follow them on their journey through the homelessness response. And additionally we realized that especially in light of covid where before we encouraged people to visit our Access Points that are for adult families to complete a coordinated entry assessment. We have some mobile teams and we realized during covid that sending people to travel was not the best option so hot has trained both the supervisors and the shift leaders to be able to provide mobile data. And so if i come up to you the street please stand by . They can work closely with the d. P. H. Street Medicine Team and work with them to go to the shelter in place hotels. And they are also with the encampment resolution when we are able to say are you at the highest risk of covid . To take a moment to thank you in the budget process and we know those will help the people not immediating eligibility for the finite resources that are costly as well. I will stop there. Thank you for the overview. Are you able to quantify what percentage of the estimated 5,000 people on the streets of San Francisco during shelter in place have been enrolled in the coordinated entry system that you described and vetted for their status of whether theyre vulnerable based on age or medical condition . I hear what you are describing. I know there are a lot of folks doing a lot of hard work and adjusting to the way we used to do this versus how we do it now, but i think what id like clarity on is what percent of that a,000 people have actually been evaluated for vulnerable status . Sure. I can answer the majority of that, and that is that i had our data team pull data as of yesterday. And as of yesterday, we have 4500 active clients in the coordinated entry system which means they are either in shelter or on the streets and engaged with coordinated entry. Anyone engaged with coordinated entry in some way had that assessment. And so would be flagged as meeting the vulnerability. That is 4,500 out of since you are now combining street homelessness with folks who are in a shelter of some kind, that is 4,500 out of what . 8,000 . That is yes, comparable to the 8,000. This is when the data gets a presumably everyone who is in a shelter by definition has been, i would hope, evaluated and so the gap there between 4,500 and estimated 8,000 would be folks on the street. And by my math that looks like at least 2 3 or more of the people on the street than have not been evaluated for that you are vulnerability status or actually put into the coordinated entry system. Or am i misinterpreting . That is what that sounds like. Im sorry because this is when we have so many systems that it gets a little bit tricky because some of those people that are captured in coordinated entry, as you said, the 4,500 people are engaging with the system. We also have people that that are captured in the one system that might not want to have gone through the coordinated entry system but might have been evaluated for vulnerability through outreach teams. They are not captured in the same way because they are not active in coordinated entry. So that is not tracked . It is tracked in street outreach in the one system. I dont have that data right now. I can look at the number of engagements. That would be something that is tracked and working with street medicine, but it doesnt necessarily mean it is reflected in the coordinated entry. One other question and i will wrap up. When a sick hotel is offered to a Vulnerable Person by any of the folks you mention, whether h. O. T. Or street medicine, but when it is offered, what is the percentage of unhoused people that accept or vulnerable unhoused people that accept the offer of a shelter in place hotel . Force that is a good question. I can only answer that based on observations i have heard from the h. O. T. Team. We have heard a lot of people say yes to sick hotel. I believe what i heard last about was it 8085 acceptance rate with sick hotels. An i am shaking my head because we asked this previously and i would really like clarity. The 80 figure is my combining safe sleeping sites and sick hotels. I think we need some clarity especially with the misinformation out there that somehow people wont take sick hotels because in our experience in talking with folks on the front line, it is virtually accepts sick hotels. I would love for us to eare move that from the equation, but if you can get updated data on that, it would be great. I think it is important to inform the policy here. An i am happy to check back with our outreach teams and get clarity on all of those. Off thank you. And again, chair mar, i appreciate the time here. I know you and others may have questions. I do just want to observe that one of the concerns and one of the driving forces of the resolution is its one thing to say as a city we are committed to providing sick hotel rooms to vulnerable populations. The concern is there is a lot of people who are vulnerable who arent being contacted, talked to, and put in the system. So were narrowing the pool from the outset of people were even talking to. So there are a lot of presumably many Vulnerable People who meet the criteria were out on the street. The second concern is whether the vulnerability criteria itself is broad enough. And those are the two things guiding the resolution. I appreciate the time and thank you, chair mar. Cha thank you for your presentation and supervisor. I dont really have any questions myself. I just wanted to say that i really do appreciate supervisor preston, you and your staff bringing this item forward and all the work that you have done on it. You make a very compelling case that people experiencing homelessness, a. , age at a much faster rate than general sheltered folks. And that we really should extend our definition of vulnerable populations to include those under 60 years old that have experienced homelessness to ensure that theyre able to have that adequate protection through a sick hotel room and other services during covid. So i really do appreciate this. And i would like to be added as a cosponsor to this. Supervisor peskin or haney, do you have any questions or remarks before we go to Public Comment . An i would, yes. First of all, thank you, supervisor preston. I know we were we worked on this together early on. I guess im just want to clarify something because it seems to me that hopefully we all agree that anybody who is on the street right now is vulnerable. Were seeing that in the numbers of deaths that have increased recently. Obviously people who are unable to shelter in place safely were on the streets, and hopefully also would agree that people who are in this resolution who were explicitly trying to expand the definition for even more vulnerable than other groups who may be younger than them. So is it really just a question of sort of scarcity in the sense that we have to pick and choose . Or is it the citys position actually that these folks who we want to include in this resolution are actually not vulnerable. Is it a choice based on scarcity or do we actually believe they are not vulnerable to covid more so than others in the city including people who are pouzed. Force i can try to answer this. This feels like a really bad crossword puzzle you cant get your brain around and i have done more medication than ever before about how to sit and make the best decisions and the data is not phenomenal. Everything is changing all the time. And make decisions and based on Public Health and what is able to do. And really the data on age alone and dont across the world is not that compelling. And i can tell you tomorrow and age alone is not compelling until you see that logarithmic jump, age alone without an illness. After age 65 is where you see age alone can have an impact. And the data is not that great. Some of the folks had underlying illnesses and even the c. D. C. Was having a hard time with the data and not someone with a bone transplant and have type i diabetes and not type ii . There was a lot of stuff that we were confused about and age alone and the 811yearold would win out. Is that 5 ayearold at risk . To make a Public Health decision and high risk might be at risk. And black and brown people are dying at higher rates alone. The c. D. C. Is still not making that. And it is a gray zone and i dont think its worth the risk to the city. Resources drive this. We will need to have the discussions soon and be coming back to the vaccine and who gets the vaccine and how the c. D. C. Decides about the vaccine. Everyone in the United States will need the vaccine on resources. We dont know there is a lot of things and i hope that i am answering your question. It is very gray. Would i choose that age . No, i would actually choose other thing and the black and brown data is much more compelling to me than the age data right now. So i think its important and these are right questions. And we are all asking the right questions. We dont know if this is the right answer. That is the kind of work we need to figure out together. Sorry to be so vague. Well, i guess another piece of this is do you believe that from what you have seen that being homeless that not having shelter or housing is a risk factor that makes you more vulnerable . So youve had to listen to me talk your ear off too many times so im going to look at what i think makes a human vulnerable. And so if i, god forbid, had cancer around my friend has cannes arenaed look at the work and what i do and i do al tern tough medicine and i do herbal medicine and i believe in other forms of healing. I believe in emotional health. I believe in spiritual health. When you look at that regardless of homelessness, regardless of everything else, those factors help us as overall beings. And if you have an illness and you go to the community of folks and spiritual and those are critical. I know from people experiencing homelessness with a lot of stress response and i believe that homelessness impacts you on your ability to recover. Some of that has to do with cham and our brains and what we can do. Having nothing to do with covid. And what we know about covid is a cytokine storm doesnt care about your relationship with your mother. It doesnt care if you are schizophrenic or at risk or using heroin from our data. Does that make sense . So 100 all the humans are at risk. We dont have enough data to say our stress response impact what is we have with covid. Supervisor and i appreciate all that and i appreciate what you said about black and latino people in our city. And especially black people are with the large percentage of our Homeless Population. One of the reasons why it seems that the shelter in Place Program is so important is not just because of the risk to covid which obviously drives some of it and exacerbated by the covid crisis. With the overdose and other factors and middle age people are in the age group focused on be overrepresented. The way i see it to protect kids from the consequences not only from covid but the larger set of factors exacerbated by the covid crisis. We have a hard time Getting Services to people, accessing health care, accessing different ways that being around other people can protect them. With the infection or death. Just a quick comment on that. We have to try to put on covid classes. And these sick rooms what were doing is like having i was trying to explain this to someone is needing a lung and heart transplant. If there is nothing for the heart, you can only do lung transplant. And the sick hotels are the lung transplant. That person still needs a heart transplant, but we dont have the heart. We have to make decisions together of what the resources are and what these are for the sick hotels are for covid. I would love to come back and have discussions and on the work group with mary ellen and the supervisor from district 10 to say what are we looking at for vulnerable . The rates of h. I. V. And are unacceptable and this is for covid. And we need to come together and say what is for the other things. Which at this point are greater for our Homeless Population than actually covid. That is not what this is about. And open the conversation to be really important and the questions are right and the answer, i dont think the answer is wrong for covid. Supervisor peskin . Supervisor why dont we go to Public Comment right now. Mr. Clerk, is there any callers on the line . Clerk thank you. We will check to see if we have any callers in the queue. For those who have connected to the meeting via phone, press star followed by 3 to be added to the queue if you wish to speak for this item. For those already on hold, wait until you are prompted to begin. You will hear a prompt informing you that your line has been unmuted and that will be the opportunity to speak. For those watching on cable channel 26 or sfgov tv, if you wish to speak on this item, agenda item 7, call in by following the instructions on your screen by dialling 4156550001. The meeting i. D. 1 146706 and press the pound symbol twice and followed by three. Connect us to the first color please. Good morning, mr. Chair. I am the policy manager for glide on behalf of the organization, i am speaking in support of supervisor pestons operation. As a leading service in the tenderloin, glide sees the physical effects of the toll it takes on clients and who are currently homeless and disproportionately black and brown. And people from triaged for care using inadequate model. Fails to distinguish between people who are house and unhoused. We know firsthand how rapidly that condition injured the body. And medical ages, unique Health Concerns and higher rate of comorbidry that exceed biological teenage with 20 years their senior. And higher risk of being exposed and to help ameliorate the defects and medical care. Recent dangerous air generated by wildfires and colder and rainier months approaching, living outdoors will move no kinder to our unhoused neighbors and loved ones. As such we are to strongly recommend that the expanded definition with the personnel. Responsible to the diamond streets. And folks living outdoors and basic human needs are met. We should not be making things more difficult to exploit homelessness and should be making it easier for people to access homelessness. Thank you for your comments. Could we have the next caller please . Hi. This is kristin evans. Owner of booksmith and i also serve as the president of the hate asbury and am a homeless advocate. I have been over 40 of these operations to do encampment resolutions and in listening to the last hour of conversation, i can see the disconnect from the city to address vulnerability and those that are actually receiving the hotel rooms. There was a substantial change into the hotels and as a result we have seen a situation where theyre just hundreds of people with who we have had intensity times for putting them indoors. The city failed miserably by allowing the e. C. Hastings lawsuit to drive resolution with the primary mechanism of identifying people to have the s. A. P. Hotel rooms and now we are left with hundreds if not thousands of people that are extremely vulnerable to the covid virus without appropriate shelter. For that reason i really encourage you to expand the definition to make it easier for people that are truly vulnerable to access safe shelter. Next speaker please. I am a resident family physician at sf General Hospital and i live in district nine. I urge you to support and expand the definition of vulnerable for people experiencing homelessness. In our hospital and clinic, i frequently care for unhoused Community Members and see the challenges they are facing and carrying for their health against massive constraints outside of their control. And especially in light of the pandemic and how to stay protected against the virus further exacerbated by poor air quality and the coming seasons that will risk lives. This is absolutely urgent. The current definition of vulnerable based on age doesnt recognize the no difference for in house people compared to those who are housed including respiratory, cardiac, multisystem, conditions, and functional impairments. In addition to the chronic stressors, Food Insecurity and the Mental Health impacts that they are experiencing daily. Ucsf shows that unsheltered individuals experienced conditions at rates that are on par with housing individuals 20 years or older. This appropriately defines vulnerable at age 45 rather than 60 for those who are unhoused and enabling them to Access Services that as a physician i know are desperately needed to address the preventible health disparity. This could potentially impact the neighbors during the pandemic and also improve longer term outcomes for our unhoused neighbors with much needed stabilization and seek shelter. Thank you. Supervisors, we have to arrive at Critical Data how many homeless we have in the city. We dont count all the Homeless People. Then you want to make an age difference. It is not about age. This is the mentally challenged and physically challenged and people who have ailments, young people, 15, 16 years old. That are die betting i, on the street, dying. And going to wait until they are 65 years old to give them son benefits . Come on, San Francisco. You say that you are leading. We are not leading like the lady said. Other than one of the comments that you made. They opened up hotel rooms in august. Why . Because they want fema to pay for it. Im going to sit by fema because i have some influence by there. You will not do that unless you make that list. Thank you very much for your comments, mr. Decosta. Next caller please. Good afternoon. As someone who has worked with the unsheltered neighbors and the impact of this is worse than anything else that i have seen so far. The feeling of abandonment is pervasive and how it can impact what makes them vulnerable. The rumor went around that there was going to be hotel rooms. I had to say, i dont know, i hope its soon. By weeks four, five, six, people started to realize the rooms werent going to be for them. The mood in every neighborhood plummeted. People already felt abandoned by their community. This is a with the other stresses and to die by their own community. And appreciate what the doctor said about knowing our lens and our focus. And when you tie of an overdose, they are so dead. When you die of a heart attack, you are still dead. And the pervasive sense is driving some of those deaths. Next caller please. Caller this is joe wilson, executive director of hospitality house. I appreciate the committees work on this and having this hearing and we see every day the ravages of homelessness and poverty and the toll it takes on our community. As a formerly homeless person, i have to say it is extremely disappointing that 35, 36 years i had to stand in line to get shelter to avoid dying on the street. Several decades later, Homeless People are Still Standing in line waiting to die. This insis the answer on data is this insistence on data is 76 are age 50 years or younger. 60 are under age 40. How much more information do we need to take action . That level of density to a younger and Younger Age Group that also means, frankly, driven purely by economics, that group is the fema cases. So let someone explain to us why they are not. When a certain point, medicine has to be fuelled by no do no harm. And living on the street is harmful for people. It is doing them harm. We know all the information that we need to act. Their immune systems are comprised by stress. Dr. Borne knows this. Thank you very much for your comments mr. Wilson. Next caller please. Good afternoon, supervisors. Thank you so much, supervisor preston, for introducing this. And thank you, chair mar, for having this item on the agenda. I am just listening to discussion and shook my head in disbelief. The person who has argued against the legislation is saying the criteria for priority treatment and given sick hotels to the homeless should be based on rates and ethnicity and not the age. Well, i should remind this lady that its not like we have done anything for the people of color who are homeless in this city. Were not treating them any better and in fact, this is the city that has just totally forgotten about its homeless. So my question to this person is, what have you done for the people of color who happen to be homeless . This is a no brainer. People who are out on the street, they tend to age much faster. It is not a San Francisco thing. Its a worldwide. I urge anyone including the lady arguing against this to spend one week on the street and see how much she is going to age. This is not a matter of kambuccha or Holistic Healing and whatnot. Most people dont have access to the luxury items that person Peoples Health Care Insurance will provide. So the best that we should do is look at the situation and realize that the most practical thing is to have people housed especially in the mid of the pandemic, and it is a no brainer that people on the street age faster. If you go through the scan, and age at 60, 65. So how about that for evidencebased medicine . Please, support this legislation, supervisors, because that thank you for your comments. Next us to the next speaker please. Caller hi, supervisors. My name is micah and i am a resident in district one. And i would like to thank and just feel the support for expanding the definition of vulnerable communities. I think the question of how much does the city value the lives of people who have been unsheltered by the structural system in the city and in the country. I feel like thats the question at the heart of this debate and i urge supervisors to really think about how much theyre willing to fight for the folks in our communities on the street. So please support this resolution. Thank you. Thank you very much for your comments. Connect us to the next caller please. Hi. This is renae and i am a resident of district five. I want to echo what everyone else has been saying in support of this legislation. And it is just unconscionable that we have the smokefilled skies and covid epidemic and even in the ideal conditions that we have so many people on the street and so many empty hotels and residential units that arent just sitting there. So that is all i had to say. Thank you. Thank you very much for your comments. Are there any further speakers . That completes the queue. Thank you. Public comment is now closed. But thanks again, supervisor preston, for sponsoring this very important measure and i like to move we recommend this to the full board. Supervisor preston, do you have any furthering remarks . Supervisor chair mar, i want to recognize the entire committee has really been so active since the start of shelter in place. And every one of the supervisors on this committee in advocating to change this sort of zero sum game mentality. When i hear the analogy that doctor talking about the doctor with the heart or the lung, and which to give someone. I think we need to recognize that the analogy here would be a doctor who has plenty of hearts and lungs to choose from and yet goes to the patient and says, you can only have one. Thats what were looking at. We as a city could be doing more, should be doing more, you all on this committee have been leaders in that. The board has made this clear. And i think that the final thing i just really want to emphasize is the timing here because we are in a season where we are on the verge of more and more people as we follow the current path and the plans of the administration being moved into congregate settings. And when we start to deal with rain and winter and more and more people with the additional outreach and the broader definition. If we dont do those things and go into hotels, we will have more and more people in congregate and we know from the Public Health department and the Public Health officer that increased dramaticcally the likelihood of having outbreaks of covid19. Thank you, chair mar, for the time on this important item . Mr. Clerk, please call roll. [roll call vote taken] mr. Chair, there are three ayes. Thank you. Agenda item 8 is an ordinance amending the administrative code to subject dwelling units at midtown Park Apartments a Residential Development owned by the city and county to the residential rent stabilization and arbitration ordinance and making findings pursuant as required by the california tenant protection act of 2019. Members of the public who wish to provide Public Comment should call the Public Comment number 41565 a0001 and enter the meeting i. D. That is 14 146 706 3442. Press the pound symbol and star 3 to enter the queue to speak. Please wait until the system indicates that you have been unmuted which will be the time to begin your comments. Mr. Chair . Thank you, mr. Clerk. Thank you for sponsoring this important measure as well. The floor is yours. I am speaking to provide rent stabilization to the longtime tenants in district five and this is a lockstanding issue in our district and of significance across the city. So i will start with background in context with midtown and discuss the amendments i plan to introduce today that have been circulated to Committee Members. Mid soun Park Apartments dates back to 1967 and created as replacement housing who lost their homes in the notorious redevelopment era. It was in many ways an admission by the city that dwomd caused tremendous damage and that complex was seen as a way in part to redress the injustice and displacement of the redevelopment era. The residents believed they had the protections referred to as rent control and with letters allowed with the rent control law. That changed abruptly to calculate how much rent each tenant with a model typical for the Affordable Housing complex. Many longterm residents and many immigrants received huge rent increase of 10 with the staggers rent increases. And they went to the rent board and to the superior court does not extend to midtown and the property is owned by the city addresses and changes what we believe is the unshare results to deny the benefit of rent control. I will say that as an aside that the city made decisions and is unusual and in the past and to roll them back and there are many reasons for that and at the end of the day it is not possible and despite a with the legislation as introduced many months ago provided to roll back and the tenant who is occupy the units and base rent would be set to the time of may 1, 2014. And would be subject to allowable increases and would be excite led to a credit for that amount in april, my office met with a number of stake holders and the with what became clear is certains a peblths needed to be adjusted to avoid unintended consequences and describe the amendments which directly address the concerns. To aplay the roll back would stand to benefit a majority of the midtown tenants and those who had the increases. So their rent decrease and to reset their rent is the last thing and nothing to do would require an inq3s and make clear that they would pursue the increases on the lowest income residents at midtown and we are proposing alternative model as part of the amounts, our amendments instead provide tenants with a choice. Their rent is set at the 2014 amount with allowable rent increases in the intervening time period is what we call the rent control option or choose to calculate with the flexibility and stability and predictability to the Mayors Office or future owner of midtown. There were concerns with what happens with a sudden and traditional rent control does not provide explicit tools for adjusting down the rent in such an event. For tenant who is initially elect the rent control path under our ordinance, we wanted to make sure in that unlikely but possible situation with a big shift over to the percentage and is essentially an optout of rent control that they can do once at some pint in the future as they need, to and the amendments provide the flexibility to avoid unintended consequences. The second main concern that was expressed to the office regarding the original version that they could interfere with the certification that may be necessary for certain tax credit and Financing Options in the future. In response we also are proposing an amendment who choose that path, they are no longer required to income certify and in the event they need information for an application to secure financing for state or federal funds that they can demand the information and would be required to provide for informational purposes but not for calculation of rent and determining eligibility to be at midtown and most importantly doesnt preclude the city from having access to all financing tools. Finally, it is pointed out by mopd that this would significantly lower our proposal to lower midtown availability to cover costs and this is not an issue we speak to resolve through amendments today and will not too so and the majority are africanamericans and many others who are immigrants and many other communities of color. The city needs to step up and make midtown thrive now and well into the future and we also believe the estimated costs are overstated. This brings me back to midtown history and the very existence of this complex is an attempt to right the wrongs of the redevelopment past with a mixed record and called midtown home for generations and to impose massive rent hikes and we hope this will go a long way to rectifying the situation. To the extent there are costs we need to invest in midtown, we are living in a moment where so many people and the country are taking to the street demanding our leaders recognize not only the black lives matter but that black homes matter. We need to address the racial injustices of the past. I am hopeful with the leadership that we start a new chapter at midtown in which the edesires of the tenants of midtown are centered and rent hikes were imposed and the entire plan to demolish midtown was advanced. Unconscionablely in my opinion without the support of midtown residents who had to organize for years to defeat and hopefully we are entering into a new era where the city can rebuild trust with the community. In closing i just want to thank the midtown Tenants Association and all the residents who meet quickly and have been very much involved in every step of this complex legislation and i appreciate their organizing determine to stop the demolition of midtown to force the city to abandon the misguided plan. Again and again you fought not just for yourself but a Better Future for all the residents of midtown which is so important to our city. So thank you mr. Chair and as i said, i believe the amendments are substantive and require the item to be heard again at your next meeting. Thank you, supervisor preston, for all of your work on this legislation and the amendments that were brought forward today to stabilize rent and support midtown community. I do want to know that we do have colleagues, we do have mocd director shaw and other staff available to answer questions and we also have nick menard and actually, nick, can you present on your fiscal analysis . Yes. And hello, supervisors. Nick menard from the Budget Office that amends chapter 37 of the administrative code to make midtown apartments owned by the city subject to residential rent stabilization and overall this will lower the project total rent collected as we say on page five of the report. The estimated increase of the operating subsi diwould be 550,000 a year. And this is just looking at the legislation that is immediately before you and not the amendment that supervisor preston is eluding to. We did have two recommendations and one is to request clarification from mohcd and the rent board on how the proposed ordinance would impact tenant rents. Tenants that are temporarily relocated there with the permanent residence under construction and request clarification on how the proposed changes would apply to the background owed by certain midtown tenants and other wise consider this a policy matter for the board. A thank you so much, nick. Supervisor before we go to Public Comment and i believe there are a number of members of the public who will be commenting on this item. Supervisor i do. Thank you, supervisor preston, and thank you to the tenants at midtown apartments who have been organized and treated very unfairly during this process by the city. Just so i understand it, so for units that are owned by the city, we have the power to by ordinance place those units within the explicit requirements of the rent control ordinance. Are there any limitations to that or is it only for units owned by the city . [please stand by] a recall a building on post street he and a walked on back in guessing 2005, 2006 which presented some very similar issues. It was a tax credit building. And what happened was and this has not happened a lot but it does come up, what happens when you take an Affordable Housing model and allow for protections and plot that on a place where people either were rent controlled or thought they were rent controlled tenant and that raised issues and complications and we worked through that and did legislation and supervisor peskin made clear tenants werent losing the protections even if you overlaid Affordable Housing. Honestly, colleagues, if midtown had been build in 2014 and everyone had come in we wouldnt have that problem and thats a shift in people with rent control protection to another program. Many protections of rent control exists in the program for example eviction protections, you dont need the rent board and frankly theres more loopholes in the rent control that allow people to be protected so in some cases the rental housing is stronger and you cant just assume the program authorized or operated by the city would have protections that are as strong and theres exclusions for cityowned property but theres nothing im aware of and the City Attorney can correct me if im wrong but theres nothing from limiting that exception and saying in certain circumstances were going to extend all to something that is city owned. Thank you, we appreciate that. Chair, i just wanted to clarify and something we brought up after reviewing the proposal we have discussed this estimate of revenue dropping by an estimated 550,000. I just want to clarify that so there are many vacant units, right now 22 in midtown, 17 are being used for temporary relocation from other projects the one in district 5 tenants are temporarily being relocated. When we look at the balance, i believe no revenue is on the Balance Sheet for that. In other words, if you look at 22 units and the revenue off of that that would more than make up were those units rented out would make up for the 550,000 but regardless event if there wasnt direct payment and this is saving the city money, it would otherwise have to be paying for temporary relocation. I want the public and if you can clarify thatd be great but i want the public to understand that were advocating we have to do it regardless of the cost, the cost is not necessarily the full 550,0 550,000 because of t revenue potential as well as to the benefits 17 units that are provided arent reflected in the annual count. Through the chair, i dont we looked at the existing rent the estimate is based on what people are paying right now and how that would change. It doesnt take in to account that. And thats consistent with our discussions that the current revenue versus expenses does not reflect any revenue or benefits the city is getting by using the temporary housing at midtown on those 17 units. Just wanted to identify that. Thank you. Thank you, supervisor peskin for that verification. Why dont we go to Public Comment. Mr. Clerk, are there any callers on the line for this. Operations checking to see if we have callers in the queue. Let us know if any callers are ready. For those who already connected via phone press star followed by 3 to be add to the queue to speak. For those already in the queue wait until youre prompted to begin and youll hear a prompt that your line has been unmuted that will be your opportunity to provide your comment. For those watching the meeting on cable 26 or streaming link or sfgov. Tv did the org if you wish to call in follow the instructions on your screen by dialing 14156550001 entering todays meeting i. D. When prompted which is 146 706 3442, push the pound twice and enter the queue to speak. Do we have any callers . [indiscernible] the city has not conducted the proper care and maintenance. We support the City Building these building under rent control and hopefully transferring as promised years and decades ago and the promise. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Please connect the next caller, please. Im from a local Grassroots Organization our city San Francisco. Currently one of our tasks is to fight the biggest worse landlord in San Francisco thats veritas and what has struck me an organizer watching the fight over midtown is how the city and county acted as a bad landlord and this helps change that. The other comment is to the substance of the item itself and thats rent control. We hear what if some of the people who live in the town suddenly get huge incomes. What about that. What people need to understand is what your income is irrelevant its the policy just like with security Social Security and they get it and understand it and defend it. We need to get to that objective of all rent control so everyone has it and respects and protects it. If that were to happen a lot of people would change their head about rent control. Its is an important measure that needs to be passed. Thank you. Next caller, please. I want you to recognize whats been done to this black families. It couldnt possibly a failure it pass the measure. I urge the supervisors to vote yes on this. Thank you. Speak up so we can hear you. Im calling in support of the resolution [indiscernible] this can provide against major increases. Rent control is [indiscernible] thank you. Thank you very much for your comments. Mr. Cooper the next caller, please. Good afternoon, this is ross vipperini. I want to register my support for supervisor prestons rent stabilization ordinance. Midtown is owned about the city and in effect city hall and the board of supervisors are the landlords and i believe the ordinance is a critical fail safe in stablizing the rent procedures while there is still consideration for the original promise of midtown. 50 years ago midtown was designed to become a Housing Cooperative so this diverse population of working class and predominantly black res departments would be home owners and the rent paid off the mortgage such as the time when i was supervisor and the office intervened and advocated we modernize affordable home owner strategies for cooperative housing but that faced stiff resistance from two mayors who had different designs for midtown. The story is midtown were heroes for decades before their mortgage note was satisfied and the reason it endured so well and effectively without assistance from city hall was the community and board of directors. We fought hard during our period in district 5 to see if we can return back to that original promise, which i encourage current City Hall Administration does. In the meantime, i think this ordinance from supervisor preston is important and deserves our wholehearted support. Thank you. Thank you very much for your comments. Next caller, please. Good afternoon, this is Milton Beltran calling from district 1. Id like to pledge my support for the passing of the item. I have no doubt youll continue hearing from supporters for Affordable Housing but please make it easier for the both of us and legalize rent control for elders in our community soonz as soon as possible. Thank you for your comment. Next caller, please. Ive been a resident for 50 years of the midtown apartments and there are several families here that have been here for four generations. We all lived here and went through hard times, good times, bad times. Im presently a part of the Tenant Committee that is pushing for rent control in the town. We appreciate Everything Everything youre doing. Theres one neighbor who was paying her rent at 700 some odd a month and they refigured and she wound up being asked for 2700 a month. She is a preschool teach working for minimum wage and lost all her savings and still trying to hold on to it in midtown. The majority of us need you to please pass this and keep what weve been promised all these years. Thank you for participating in the discussion. Next caller, please. This is lorie beardman thank you for the residents who have been ignored and misled by the s city of San Francisco. Midtown apartment began as a token compensation for the massive displacement of the black community from the fillmore district. It was established as a rent to own development with the city as landlord and failed miserably to maintain the structures over a period of decade resulting in extensive deferred maintenance and the city failed to comply with the americans with disability act. Tenants never applied for b. M. R. Housing units and they were not adjusted by any factor other than that established under rent control. When the residents paid down the mortgage without Resident Engagement the city hand the property to mercy to manage as b. M. R. This was outside the promry promissory notes of rent to own and there was a new payment structure with harsh impacts and imposed rules of indignity and a plan for massive new development. This proposal is a vital step to restore the promises broken and restoring housing nor residents of midtown. Please support it. Thank you. Thank you. Next caller, please. Im david wu i live in district 5. I want to echo all the sentiments that have already been expressed. Im speaking in support of supervisor prestons ordinance to return rent control protections to midtown. The displacement historically occurred in the western edition unfortunately continues to this day. It is through the organizing of Community Members and tenants that residents fought back and ask the board of supervisors support midtown tenants and approve this legislation. Thank you thank you, mr. Wu. Next caller, please. Good afternoon. Im a resident in midtown. Ive been a resident more than 30 years. I am an African American citizen and retired school teacher. Under the program rent has increased by 300 . Over the years ive watched along with my neighbors promises broken. Rebelieve black lives matter and and if you believe black lives matter i urge you to vote in support of the legislation and be on the right side of history. Thank you to supervisor preston and to supervisor haney for doing the hard work. Thank you. Thank you very much. Can we get the next caller, please. Hello. This is a member of San Francisco tenants union. Im in full support of restoring rent control to the midtown tenants. Its egregious what happens to them in the past while mercy came in and everything got shifted around. The repairs need to be done. The city is now the landlord we want to have rent control. Please pass this measure and move it on to the full board. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Next caller, please. Supervisor. Lauren penny here. Im a member of senior and disability action. Most importantly for today i am a longtime neighbor of the good folks at midtown apartments. I recommend restoring rent control in midtown and this the first step for repairing the damage the city has done to the people of midtown. Midtown residents, largely African American and some other people of color and their succeeding generations i feel have been betrayed by the city many times over for more than 50 years. First displaced from their homes in fillmore in the 60s by racially targeted redevelopment. Second, they thought they were paying off their rents with midtown and they were denied and new management proceeded to raise the rents and you heard and threatened with demolition. Many residents are seniors and people with disabilities. Since 2014 they have endured six years of extreme anxiety and uncertainty. The very least the city can do at this point is restore rent control. This is an issue of fairness. Its an issue of justice and humanity. It is an issue of black homes matter. This is the citys chance to begin to correct the wrongs the city itself has committed. Thank you very much. Thank you. Could we get the next caller, please. Hello im care line hatch and in support of this legislation. Its high time we made some reparations for the things that were done to the black community in the fillmore district through redevelopment and think this is a good start but think theres more we should do. Thank you for your time and i urge you to support this legislation. Thank you. Thank you, caroline hatch. Next caller, please. Im a resident of midtown apartments and asking for support of supervisor peskins ordinance regarding the rent control protections for the midtown apartment. I believe this legislation is for resident thought we were under rent control based on documents signed and however, that sl suddenly changed as stad from supervisor peskins testimony when our rent went up 300 or more and if changes are not made it will cause displacement and people would have to move out. The majority of our community are African American and other minority groups. This protects residents from being forced out and priced out of their homes. If you would like to support our community, i urge you to please support this legislation. Thank you so much for your time. Thank you very much for your comments. Please connect the next caller, please. Hi, ive been living here in midtown more than 20 years. And im a nativeamerican indian. And retired from the navy 20 years and im one of the tenants youve been hearing about having gone through increase 300 when mercy came and took over as the landlord back in 2014. I urge the supervisors to support supervisor peskin for the legislation. Previous supervisors didnt do anything and supervisor peskin came forward with the legislation. Im here to support comment. Next caller, please. I want to tell stories of residents who were told theyd were under rent control and then got to old age and then suddenly have rent increase. We have to take it seriously it wasnt the deal tenants had and we need to restore what they thought they always had. The other issue even if this costs the city money and i think we will in some way, the city needs to make that investment. Not only is it essential for reparation to the community thats been disadvantaged for decade and we need to invest that money. Its worth it. And its not only a lack of reparation but the opposite, if the city doesnt invest the money, what happens is the tenants working people who saved money all their lives what tried to put aside something for their children and future and old age every month can no longer do that or build their own equity and savings for the future because theyre required to pay every extra and pay out more every time. Its a continuation of a system that has adviso disadvantaged l black community for decades. Thank you. Please connect the next caller, please. Im heidi peterson. A resident in district 5. Id like to thank supervisor peskin for his support of the residents and rent control. I want to make one point the seniors and especially the longterm residents in our community are creating a longterm community. The should support the couldn couldnt continuity that comes from longterm tenant. I want to support this and say thank you and please remember the value of the residents and their longterm status is far beyond the residents gut the city and community too. Next caller, please. Hello. Im a resident of San Francisco in district 8. I have been work in housing iss issues for the last couple years and wanted to come here because my midtown is a great example of how the city let people down. Midtown was built in 1967 as a replacement for the fillmore families that lost their homes during the urban development. Its a shameful time in the citys history and something we have to work for decades and decades and centuries to make up for the enormous disruption to families here in San Francisco. Im calling to urge the committee to approve this legislation and adjust the rent owned by longterm tenant to what would have been rent control and provides future direction. We have to make sure that we show up for our black community here in San Francisco which has already been decimated over the decades. We need to show up and we need to support them. This legislation is about fairness. Rent control is for a reason and mid town is no less deserving of rent control than anybody else. Without rent control historically black midtown communities that risk displacement and if you believe black homes matter please vote yes on supervisor peskins legislation. Thank you very much. Thank you for the comments. Next caller, please. This is the first step residents deserve to own. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Next caller, please. Is there a caller on the line . If you heard your line is unmuted you are live. Wed love to hear your comments now. My name is natalia. Im a longterm supporter of midtown and have also written extensively about midtown history and would like to thank supervisor peskin for introducing this incredibly important legislation that offers the form of reparations to the black community in midtown and will hopefully set them on a path to longterm equi equity. The situation as a result of decisions made by the city neglect and discriminatory so i thank supervisor peskin for recognizing an investment needs to be made to right the historic wrongs of city policy and restore represent control to midtown. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Next caller, please. I just made a comment so you unmuted the wrong caller. Thank you for your honesty. Well move on to the next one. Hi, im 22 years old and been living with my parents here since i was born and the whole rent increase thing made me fear id have to move out of s. F. And ill be able to live with my family no longer so i appreciate the rent control legislation because it would allow me to continue living with my family which is important because this community is what ive grown up with all my life. Thank you. Thank you, next speaker, please. Am i next. You are live. Begin your comments. I thought someone else was speaking. Perhaps your television or computer are on delay. Start now and ill begin your timer. This is betty trainer with senior disability action and we wole heartedly support this legislation and thank supervisor peskin for interdufrg introducing it. I live in a coop down garry from midtown and we were built also because of the redevelopment so we understand what theyre going through but also we as a strong coop have been able to do maintenance at our place. We have a tenant controlled coop. So i really feel this legislation is so important to begin the role for the tenants there to have more control and to be treated fairly by the city to stop this deferred maintenance thats happened all along. Its crucial this be the beginning of something that is so needed by the tenants there at midtown. Thank you very much. Thank you very much for your call, betty trainer. Next caller, please. My name is alice. I live in s. F. And calling in to support the ordinance to return historic rent control protection to the midtown apartments. I think this is important legislation being put forth and rent control is crucial now in covid times. It was for the families who lost their homes during the urban redevelopment and we cant ignore the fact its mostly black people, right. So midtown was developed as cooperative housing with an opportunity to own but the city never fulfilled that promise to the residents and the legislation addresses the rent hike and it also provides future protections against major rent increases. I think this is important and something all the board of supervisors should be supporting. Thank you so much. I yield my time. Thank you. Are there any further callers . Theres one more caller. Hi, hi name is emily and i live in district 9. Im calling in support of supervisor peskins ordinance to return to historic rent control protect to midtown apartment. We know midtown was built in 1967 as a replacement housing for fillmore families who lost their home during the racist urban development and developed as rent to own but the city never fulfilled this promise to residents. The legislation addresses the rent hikes by addressing those tenants and rent control and provides future protection against rent increases. Its a first step to fairness. The town deserves rent control protection just as much as anywhere else in the city. Without the rent control the historically black community is at risk of displacement. Please restore the rent control. Next spaeshgs, please. Next speaker, please. My name is rufus watkins. Im a tenant of midtown Park Apartments and am African American and grew up here for 30 years. Please support the legislation. Thank you. Next speaker, please. My name is joseph wyatt. I am a 26 year resident of midtown Park Apartments. Im African American and a senior citizen. I am calling in full support of supervisor peskins legislation for rent stabilization at midtown Park Apartments. Im looking forward to a bigger and Brighter Future for midtown. Thank you. Thank you very much for your comments. Do we have any further callers . That completes the queue. Thank you. Thanks to everyone who spoke during Public Comment and thank you to supervisor peskin id like to be added as a cosponsor. Do you have any final remarks . Thank you. Thank you for all the time on this item and previous ones on a busy agenda that i know you have. I just want to thank all the folks from the community and mid town not just for calling in but being part of crafting the legislation and it took many months and amendments but i think weve landed on something that will really help. I also want to recognize and thank district perrini not just for taking the time today to call in but his active engagement when he was supervisor. He did a resolution this body long before my time actually in his second term that was an important resolution about talki talking about the history of midtown and the promises made and as many callers stated theres a longer term discussion we need to have about how we return ownership or control or both in a smart way determined by and to the residents of midtown so residents have permanent stability and this will help stabilize the homes of so many people whose time at midtown has been destabilized by huge rent increases that are unfair and wrong and this legislation will address head on. Thank you and i appreciate your cospons cosponsorship and look forward to the measure with recommendation. Supervisor haney. Thank you, supervisor peskin and the members of midtown Park Apartments and would like to be added as a cosponsor. Supervisor peskin. Thank you, chair mar and supervisor peskin. I have a history with midtown back in supervisor perrinis day and worked with your predecessor to figure things out and youre the first to figure it out. More than supportive and wanted to added as a cosponsor. I think what you want us to do and the motion you want us to make is to adopt the amendment and continue at one week. Thank you. I apologize. Thank you for those motions. Mr. Clerk, please call roll on the motion by supervisor peskin. On the motion to amend the ordinance as amended by supervisor motion made by peskin but the amendment by supervisor peskin on the amendment. [roll call]. Mr. Chair on the amendment there are three ayes. And id make a motion to continue the item to the next meeting of the government audit and Oversight Committee. The next meeting is october 1 just to note for the record. On the motion the item be continued as amended to the october 1 government audit and Oversight Committee meeting. [roll call] mr. Chair, there are three ayes. Thank you. Mr. Clerk can you please call item number 9 resolution supporting usf workers united, a Broad Coalition of workers and faculty members at the university of San Francisco, drastically affected by furloughs, cuts in healthcare and employment benefits, and lack of safety protocols during covid19. Members of the public who wish to proved Public Comment call the number 14156550001 now. Enter the meeting i. D. Its 146 706 3442. Press pound twice to connect to the meeting and then press the star key followed by the number 3 to speak. A prompt will indicate you raised your hand and wait until it indicates you have been unmuted and you may begin your comments and im in receipt of a memo requesting this be agendized and consideration for the board of supervisors during the september 22 regular meeting next tuesday. Thank you, mr. Clerk. Mr. Haney, the floor is yours. This should be fairly quick. Colleagues, today is a resolution in support of usf workers united a Broad Coalition of workers standing in solidarity during the Public Comment is closed to protect the well being and workers at usf and the faculty and students at the university. I drafted this resolution with the Coalition Members and opeiu local 29 and United Service workers west, local 87 and loge local 2 and usf parttime Faculty Association. Oge local 2 and usf parttime Faculty Association. Ge local 2 and usf parttime Faculty Association. E local 2 and usf parttime Faculty Association. Local 2 and usf parttime Faculty Association. Local 2 and usf parttime Faculty Association. The workers are in a position that many have found themselves facing furloughs and facing potential layoffs and cuts and reduced hours. The result is that many are wondering not just how theyre going to pay the bills also how theyre going to qualify for needed benefits and continue to be able to Access Health care. The university of San Francisco is an essential institution here in our city with a very long and proud history including a tradition of social justice. This resolution comes in that spirit and asks them respectfully they bargain in good faith with the members of usf workers united and prioritize the following. Continue to offer access to Affordable Health care for usf Community Members laid off or furloughed or lost teaching unit or bargaining for a safe return to campus. Understanding custodian recommendations for reopening and the protection of all workers and students at usf. During the economic crisis we must look out for our most vulnerable workers, service workers, labor workers and janitors are generally the first group to be target the by furloughs and layoffs and must be support and voices heard. Before we move forward with any comments in Public Comment, two clerical amendments. And we distributed these amendments to the committee. One is correcting the number where Faculty Association represent the approximately 468 nonschool faculty and librarians correcting the number to 468 and adding the word librarian. My understanding is this is a challenging time for the university and theyve also experienced losses to revenue and student enrollment. With that said theres reasonable things the university can do to support their workers during this time and i think its important that our board stand in solidarity with the usf workers during this Public Comment is closed. During this pandemic. Thank you, supervisor haney, for this resolution and im in support of the workers as they bar fan with the college bargain as they lobby for their jobs and continue to work. Id like to be added up support. We can move to Public Comment. For those who connected by phone press star followed by 3 speak on agenda item 9. For those on in the queue continue to wait nul until you hear your line is unmuted. And for those on cable 26 or through sfgov tv. Org call 14156550001 and press meeting number conference and pound twice and 3 to be entered in the queue to speak. Do we have any callers . I have callers in the queue. Ill cue the first caller. Hello, supervisors. This is david wu again as a form former usf student i urge and support you to support this resolution and all the workers at usf. Thank you. Thank you for continuing to participate, mr. Wu. Next caller, please. Good afternoon im charles cross. This pandemic affected us significantly and were only providing essential housing as defined by the city. We have fewer students and greater Financial Aid needs due to changes. We provide 100,000 annually to provide Financial Aid. The revenue shortfall is about 16 . Were only housing 200 compared to 2500. Food Service Provided by bone appetit management is only serving for 200 students compared to 8,000 needs per day a year ago. Housing shortfall is about 35 million alone. We implemented furr lows and lay furloughs and layoffs at all levels and the moment is less than 40 of almost 2,000 employee. The layoffs were in areas where we have no work to be performed. Approximately 20 employees opted for Retirement Programs and we have covered the benefit cost for those employees furloughed during the summer. We implemented Salary Reductions across the university and the plan is progressive with reductions starting at the 70,000 level and progressing up to 20 to the highest paid employees. No employee under has experienced a reduction in salary or benefits. Usf has provided the safest environment possible for faculty and staff but the situation has created financial constraints. We addressed the shortfalls in responsible fashion and made the cuts necessary so solve this problem. Unfortunately not all have participated. Those units that did not participate did not experience thank you for your comments. Can we get the next speaker, please. Hi, im with opeiu local 29 and i have the pleasure of being the Program Representative for Office Assistants of the university of San Francisco. We repeatedly tried to engage the university in concessions based bargaining were fot blind to the challenges but usf refused to engage with us on what could have been significant savings by looking at the Retirement Program that costs them 17 million a year. We unfortunately are now in a position where we have 12 members who have permanently lost their jobs and we have had members who have been forced in to a parttime situation without Health Care Benefits during the Public Comment is closed. Mr. Crosss representation of the budget is hiyperbolizing an they have chose enprofits over people and need to get back to their jesuit values. Thank you. Next caller, please. Im amanda mckale on behalf of the resident directs at the university of San Francisco we live on campus for those living on campus and our exposure rates are extremely rate relative to other employees who were given the opportunity to work remotely. The university of San Francisco made the decision to remove our employee status previously spoken to us about and move it to reduction in hour status removing Health Care Benefits, educational benefits and any other benefits previously conferred by our position. This prevents us from protecting ourselves while on the job. I want to implore you to continue to advocate on behalf of usf workers and all aspects of the university and want to thank mr. Hany for sponsoring this bill. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Next caller. Good afternoon. My name is ann marie belda and live in the tenderloin, supervisor hanneys district and also an employee of usf and an urge the board to approve this resolution. As part of the many employees partially furloughed i did not receive any benefits package. Contrary to what the earlier caller said i took a pay cut because i was told so. We ask the university sit down and speak with us. All unions. Its not really taken place. No discussions, all unions i know on campus are wanting a discussion and we are waiting to have that meeting and thats not happened. We also ask Union Leadership with the mission of social justice to please meet with us and different members on campus as we want to talk about this and this has really had some real time impact on our lives. I think the board for bringing this resolution up and to supervisor haney for all the support to usf workers united. Thank you. Next caller, please. Hello. I am a member at the university of San Francisco part of staff. Thank you supervisor haney for your support. This situation has [indiscernible] and these are colleagues and people that matter. They have been removed taking away the benefits at a time like this not only puts pressure on the staff to continue to do the great work they do on campus and passes on responsibilities to them for what is going on and thats extremely ridiculous at a time in which they are subject to covid and the other things going on in our society. This is a way for the university to [indiscernible] and i implore you to look into this. Thank you for providing your comments. Please connect us to the next speaker, please. That completes the queue. Thank you. Thanks to all the speakers during Public Comment. Supervisor haney would you like to make a motion. Id like to move to send this to the full board and Committee Report. Did you want to make the amendments . Yes, sorry. I want to move the minor amendments first. On the motion to amend offered by member heaney. [roll call]. Mr. Chair, there are three ayes on the motion to amend. Thank you, mr. Clerk. I want to move the resolution to full board and Committee Report. Recommended to a Committee Report on that motion. On that motion. [roll call]. Mr. Chair, there are still three ayes. Thank you, mr. Clerk. Last but not least can you please call item number 10. Resolution urging the association of bay area governments abag in its upcoming Regional Housing needs allocation rhna process to focus on San Franciscos unmet needs for housing affordable to low and moderateincome residents, counteract the displacement of low and moderateincome communities of color in core urban cities like San Francisco and oakland, prioritize increases to the regions abovemoderate rhna allocation in high resource and high opportunity jurisdictions, and limit increases in abovemoderate rhna allocations to bay area cities with concentrations of sensitive communities. Members of the public who wish to provide Public Comment on this resolution call the Public Comment number now it is still 14156550001, enter the meeting i. D. For todays meeting is 146 706 3442 press the pound symbol twice to connect to the meeting and press the star key to enter the queue to speak. Prompts will indicate you have raised your hand. Wait until the system indicates you have been unmuted. That will be the time to give your comment and i received a note for nis to be continued to september 22. We considered this item and ive spoken on it a few times before but i wanted to share brief remarks today given how important this is in solving Housing Affordability crisis along with the board and this is to be assigned to bay area city through the Regional Housing needlecation process. The socalled allocation is important in shaping the total number of new homes each jurisdiction needs to build and how affordable they need to be to meet the Housing Needs of people of all income levels. Id like to add to the summary of the key points to the resolution outlined by the clerk and ill highlight the resolution urging to consider past over performance in above moderate income category so were less likely to be subject to sb 35 streamlining of condos. And urging the potential s. B. 35 impact on cities like ours with concentrations of sensitive communities to avoid the inequitable outcomes of gentrification and Racial Disparities and segregation. San francisco has taken on much of the regions Housing Development far above our regional share of households and data showed we overbuilt luxury apartments and our city was at 140 of the goals for above moderate marketrate housing with over two years to go in the current cycle. Meanwhile, we vastly under produced new housing to meet the needs of low and moderate housing and the covid crisis is triggering changes in housing and exacerbating quick inequities and many are left to seek housing elsewhere. Lowincome households ton live in overcrowd and unfit conditions and working class essential workers continue to commute to their jobs from ever longer distances. What we build and who we build it for matters and the market wont solve the problem it help to create. We need to prioritize addressing the Housing Affordability needs of our residents and that begins with setting the right goals and following that through the Housing Element of the San Francisco general plan. I would like to thank my cosponsors supervisors ronin and mandelman and groups including the council of coalition and others and id like to thank planning director rich hillis and planning staff and finally my legislative aid who did a tremendous amount of work on the complex and important resolution. I urge your support in moving this forward today. Unless colleagues have comments or remarks, i move to amend. Mr. Clerk, are there callers on the line . Operations check if we have callers in the queue and ill go over the routine the last time. For those who connected via phone press star added by 3 to be added to the queue to speak. For those on hold wait until you are prompted to begin and youll hear the system inform you your line has been unmuted. For those watching on cable channel 26 or through sf gov tv. Org you can dial 14156550001 and enter the meeting i. D. By 146 706 3442 when prompted then press pound twice and then press 3 to enter the queue for the item and were ready to hear from the first caller if they are also ready. Supervisors, this is david wu again. I live in district 5 and work in district 6. I fully support this resolution and want to thank supervisor mar and all the supporting supervisors for putting this forward woe must focus on actual unmet needs when it comes to the promise. We cannot continue overbuilding over housing and gentrification that results from trickle down housing has to be addressed. I support this resolution and urge the full board to pass it. Thank you. Good afternoon. Im calling on behalf of the San Francisco Action Coalition owe posing the resolution because it will exacerbate the Housing Affordability crisis. While the resolution takes aim at marketrate housing it would stop the city from approving subsidized Affordable Homes and limit the increase of the citys requirement for above moderate marketrate housing targets. Should the citys rate be artificially low mixedincome housing will lessen the number of Affordable Homes for low and middleincome san franciscans and by punting our housing responsibilities housing cost wills continue to skyrocket and the workers who keep the city functioning will have no choice but to commute for hours to San Francisco to work. In San Francisco marketrate housing pays through the inclusionary laws. For example, these units have accounted for over 1700 new Affordable Homes between 2015 and 2019. Thats roughly 35 of the total Affordable Housing created. Additionally its provided over 350 million to be used on 100 affordable projects. Over 22,006 housing. Market rate units create and fund affordable ones yet this resolution demonizes these lies and we oppose the resolution. Thank you. Next caller, please. Hello. We are dealing with displacement. We are dealing with communities of color that are being displaced from cities like San Francisco and oakland and i approve of this legislation. I read through the entire new and improved legislation. Im happy that my supervisor mandelman from district 8 contributed to the language and i encourage all supervisors to support this measure. Thank you. Thank you. Next caller, please. My name is gary in district 2 with the San Francisco land use coalition. Im calling in support of supervisor mars resolution the number of entitles are half as many as 2018. If the board of supervisors approves overly aggressive goals this would increase the current level of housing speculation in San Francisco which is unacceptable. It would not increase the housing units. Thank you and thank you supervisor mar for your resolution. Thank you. Is there a caller . This is cath ran katherine howard. I support this resolution. Im get muted and unmuted. I hope this gets through. I support this resolution and i appreciate supervisor mar and the cosponsors for introducing this. Along with residents from all over San Francisco we submitted a letter to this committee and put peoples full names and district number on it. Since we resubmitted it you get the idea. One of the goals the letter was to save the committees time so ill end my comment by reaffirming our support for this resolution. Thank you. Connect us to the next caller, please. Im speaking for the Neighborhood Council board of directors. Every hundred units of new housing every market rate housing means Affordable Housing cant be used on the site and think of supplementals on housing legislation and implement. Thank you. Next caller, please. Im a member of the members disability action and long time renter from district 5. I sent a letter and spoke out in favor of supervisor mars resolution earlier for the previous hearing. I just wanted to report back that upon reading the amendments i believe they have my support and to me theyve strengthened the reasons why they should recognize Affordable Housing and should act accordingly if the choice between affordable and market rate housing with an emphasis. Our homeless and seniors and people with disabilities and