a decade now. it's getting unsealed which means it becomes public. in her original action in florida, virginia giuffre who brings these allegations against prince andrew said she was exploited notjust by jeffrey epstein but his closest male peers including royalty. she's never defined he that is. prince andrew's lawyers say that all the allegations she makes are baseless, not true but evenif she makes are baseless, not true but even if they were, this document prevents her from even if they were, this document prevents herfrom bringing the action. this is the critical point in this case, really, because if the judge rules the document effectively bars any action then it's judge rules the document effectively bars any action then its game over for her and the case stops. however, course, if the document is open to interpretation, we are going to hear further arguments from the prince's lawyers that the case should be thrown out on all sorts of other grounds, including the fact the complainant doesn't even live in the us. meanwhile she says she wants