Transcripts For FBC The Intelligence Report With Trish Regan 20170207

Veterans, we can figure out how to expedite that process. The idea that were sitting around having a discussion about personnel inhibiting the care the veterans deserve really does not bode well for the reflection that we want in this country. People who have served this nation, we should be wednesdaying over we should be bending other backwards to make sure that the services they frankly earned is something that is given the highest priority and something that the president remains highly committed to. Miriam borgess. Yeah, miriam. Hi [inaudible] the president is going to be speaking today with [inaudible] yeah. I would like to know how President Trump sees the relation with spain [inaudible] so im not going to well have a readout after the call, but i imagine theyre going to talk about a shared commitment to defeating isis and that theyll discuss our bilateral relationship and reaffirm our commitment between the two countries. I think we will have a readout on that call with spain as we will with all the countries and all the other leaders that we talk to and have in the past. I dont want to get too far ahead of it. But i would imagine that the current relationship we have with spain and our commitment to isis will be at the forefront of that. Maria pena. March ya. Yeah, hear. Yeah. Sorry. Thank you. Its kind of loud in here. Twopart question. One, can you confirm whether or not the white house has accepted the credentials of the new mexican ambassador . And also representative mike rogers, i believe, this morning said he plans to introduce a bill to impose a 2 tax on all remittances of mexican [inaudible] to the country to pay for the wall. Would the president rally behind that bill . So, first, id have to get back on you on the ambassadors credentials. I dont know. We can check with the department of state and figure that out. I dont know that right off the top of my held, and im not going to comment we dont put out administration statements on policy until the bill has gone through. The president , as you know, campaigned for 18 months on replacing the Affordable Care act. Where is his plan . Hes working with congress. I think i just answered that question, but hes working with speaker ryan. I mean, youre acting [inaudible] does he owe the American People something now . And i think hes been very clear that he owes the American People a result thats going to lower costs and provide more access. Thats what he continues to work with speaker ryan on. I think the speaker was very clear on it that theyre having meetings both legislatively and at the principal level. And as you heard speaker ryan, we continue to be optimistic about competing this thing by the end of this year. Its a mammoth bill, what they passed, and weve got to make sure we get it right. Premiums have skyrocketed, access and options have gone down. We need to make sure we dont do this in a way thats going to end up with the same results. John roberts. On yemen, one of the worlds most wanted terrorists is taunting President Trump, calling him a fool after that race. Right. Any response from the white house and absolutely. That, he was not that was, the raid that was conducted in yemen was an intelligencegathering raid. Thats what it was. It was highly successful. It achieved the purpose it was going to get, saved the loss of life that we suffered in the injuries that occurred reporting that he was the target . Absolutely. He was not the goal of the railed was intelligence gathering. Of the raid. And thats what we received, thats what we got, thats why we can deem it a suck. John roberts. [inaudible] if the president does not prevail at the ninth Circuit Court of appeals, will he take this to the Supreme Court lets see where we go. I think hes made it i just finish . Yeah. Okay, im sorry. Is he concerned that if this does go to the Supreme Court with its current 44 makeup, that this temporary restraining order may become a little more permanent . Well, remember, tonight is about restraining order, were not i understand, but i think its important to explain this to everyone, john, because i know to you get it, and so many i just want to make sure. Tonight is about the restraining order. It has nothing to do with the merits of the case, and thats why i think we feel confident. The question is, does the restraining order get lifted or not. But regardless of what happens tonight, the merits of the case still need to be, to discuss. And i think the merits of the case as they were in boston are ones that we feel very confident on, because the law is Crystal Clear on this. The president has the authority to do this, it was done so in an interagency process that insured that all the appropriate people were consulted. We went through that with flying colors. I have zero concern that at the end of the day well be fine. Its just a question of going through the process. [inaudible conversations] and i get all that. Okay. But as you pointed out, but if he does not prevail, if the ninth circuit, will he take im not going to get lets see where it goes first. Our goal is to get to a point we can argue it on the merits. We feel confident based on how the court has reacted in massachusetts that were going to be good on the merits. Jonathan swan with. Sean, thanks for the question. Yeah. President trump still plan to immediately terminate president obamas executive [inaudible] with respect to what, daca and dapa . Ive said this before, well have further updates on that. I understand go ahead. Just you said immediately i understand. And ive said before the president will have further updates on both daca and dapa very shortly. Weve been very cheer on immigration what clear on immigration what the president s priorities would be. Theres going to be continued progress on the wall and on immigration as a whole, so were going to have plenty of time to address this. Right now hes trying to do it in a very systematic way in accordance to where we find the biggest problems. Hes been very clear in the past that those who are in this country that pose a threat to us or with a criminal record are where his priorities are going to be first and foremost, and were going to move through the rest of the folks in this country illegally. Sarah. Thank you, sean. The Ayatollah Khomeini said today that trump has, quote, helped iran reveal the true face of america. He says iran doesnt fear trump, and he encouraged iranians to march in the street against america later this week. Does the president have a response to those comments, and does he plan to take additional action against iran if its leaders continue to escalate i think the ayatollahs going to realize that there is a new president in office. This president s not going to sit by and let iran flout its violations or its apparent be violations to the joint agreement. But he will continue to take action as he sees fit. The president s also made clear time and time again that hes not going to project what those actions will be, and he will not take anything off the table. But i think iran is kidding itself if they dont realize theres a new president in town. John [inaudible] thank you, sean. On thursday, weather permitting, the president is going to meet with Airline Executives from throughout the country. Two complaints from Airline Executives as well as the Pilots Association have been, one, that Norwegian Airlines got a special advantage, a foreign carrier permit from the Obama Administration, and also that the airlines of the emirates9, the Arab Emirates are state subsidized, and both cases are violations of the blue skies act between the u. S. And the e. U. Is this something hes going to address, and is he considering upending president obamas foreign carrier permit . Well, again, thatll be something that thatll be decided when they meet, what theyll talk about. Obviously, the president s going to want to talk about Economic Growth and job creation, how hes enacting orders to make sure the countrys safe. On the case of norwegian, my understanding if im correct there is a deal in which theyre having 50 president of the crews and the 50 of the crews and pilots are american based, theyre flying boeing planes. Theres a huge economic interest that america has in that deal right now. I dont want to get ahead of the president on that. But just to be clear, i mean, we are talking about u. S. Jobs both in terms of the people who are, you know, serving those planes and the person whos building those planes. Thats a very big difference. Zeke. Sean, a few minutes ago you said the president wanted to remind the American People on how prevalent terrorist attacks are and that the earth is a dangerous place. That kind of breaks the rhetoric weve seen of [inaudible] bipartisan administrations have used when it comes to terrorist attacks, encouraging americans to go about their thats not yeah, his message to the American People is he is fully committed to doing everything he can to keep the country safe. And i think that theres a big difference between what youre saying and the point that he was making yesterday. And i think what hes getting at, he was making a point to the exposure that attacks get. And i think thats what he was getting at, is that we see these things, and theyre becoming too prevalent. And i think thats why he wants to become evervigilant, to make sure we dont ever get lax. We need to be reminded that places and groups like isis continue to seek to do us harm, and it is his job as commander in chief to do everything he can to get ahead of the curve and keep this country safe. I think when you look at the poll that came out last week, and i think it was 67 of the American People agreed with his proposition to put further restrictions on people. , to make sure that we have countries who are sending people to our country that they are coming here for peaceful purposes and that if we cant guarantee those countries have the proper vetting and systems in place when theyre outbound to the United States, then we need to do what we can. And he will do what he has to as president to make sure that this countrys safe. And that so i think theres a, the point that he was making was not, was not to put fear in anybody, but to rather reassure them that as president of the United States he is taking every single step to do what, to do what he has to to get ahead of the threat, to get ahead of the concerns so were not looking in the Rearview Mirror thinking what could we have done, that were preventing lives, where its the raid in whether its the raid in yemen, the law that hes enacting, hes going to do what he can to make sure the homeland is protected and safe. Mara. Thank you. I have two questions, one of on [inaudible] and one on health care. When the president tweeted if something happens, blame the judge and the court system, did he mean if a terrorist attack is committed by somebody from these seven countries or any terrorist attack should be blamed on the judge . I think the point that the tweet is pretty clear. But i think his point is that kind of dovetails what i was just saying to zeke. Hes doing everything he can, and he walks into office, theres seven countries that the Obama Administration has already identified as not having the proper systems in place to guarantee our safety. And i think his Immediate Reaction is to do what he has to do to make sure that were not looking back and saying you know what we should have done . We should have had stricter vetting in place for those seven countries. So he took immediate and Decisive Action to make sure this country and our people are protected. Making sure we dont have a regret that a month from now, two months from now or a year from now we havent done something to protect people. So he acted as quick and decisively as possible to make sure that we put the systems in place to protect our people. And that, i dont think theres any other way to read that. Yeah, len on health care, can i just get my of course. You just said hell negotiate price, and thats something he yeah he ran on negotiating prices for medicare drug prices, and i just want you to clarify because when he met with big pharma the other day, before the meeting he said we have no choice, we have of to get prices down. Right. After the meeting he said he would oppose anything that makes it harder for these companies to bring their drugs to market including price fixing by medicare. So is he for medicare negotiating drug prices or not . Hes for it, yes. Hes still for it. Absolutely. Okay. The president when you look at drug costs, and not just drug costs, the u. S. Government has not done frankly, the easier way to look at this is what other countries have done, negotiating costs to end keep those down. That drives up Health Care Costs for every american, but particularly theres a huge burden on americas seniors who are so much more reliant on drug prices. And i think in many cases you have People Living on a fixed income, and Health Care Costs, rising Health Care Costs and prescription drugs continue to be a burden on their ability to live out their lives in a much more enjoyable manner. And so his commitment is to make sure that he does what he can. And i think rather successfully uses his skills as a businessman to drive them down. Margaret. Sean, can you clarify two things. Secretary kerry kelly, excuse me, when he was on the hill today said that the administration right now is not looking at adding other countries to the temporary travel ban list. Is the white house still giving itself room to add some countries to that list . Well, i think what he, what his point was is that right now hes not doing it. You have to look at his testimony in context. I think he went through the fact that were still in this review process, that he is committed to making sure that we looked at all other countries. Be but as of this moment, there is no immediate desire to add to that. Hes looking at all the other countries, the procedures we have with them, the systems we have in place to check them. To nothing is final until the end of the review period. I had a second question. Oh, im sorry. So still leaving room to do that. Something that the president continues to say as a phrase, and im hoping you can define it for us, is that this is about who truly loves america. How do you quantify that . What is the president thinking of . Is that a specific test . What does that mean . Look, i think theres a i think president , you know, his goal is to make sure that people arent coming here to do us harm, that theyre going through the proper extreme vetting in cases where we dont have the information required to make a good judgment on them based on what their countrys willing to provide, that we are taking the proper, necessary steps to protect our people. But he doesnt if someones coming here to to do us harm oro espouse things that that would give us an indication theyre not coming here for the right reason, we need to, a, vet them, and, b, unless were 100 certain, keep them out of the country. Its a background check. Its a background check its not. To the sense that we can, extreme vetting is what hes talked about. If theres any cause for concern, he wants to go to every step possible to make sure that people who are entering this country are doing so because they want to come here for the right reasons and for peaceful reasons. Yeah. On korea [inaudible] south korean knows that trump is very good friend of theirs and [inaudible] most important part of [inaudible] what would what what is most important part of trump [inaudible] most parent part of important part of the policy. Thank you. He had a conversation the other day, and we look forward to fulfilling that conversation. I think, obviously, the threat of north korea is the most prominent issue that faces south korea and our alliance right now. He wants to reassure the south korean government that we are going to do what we can to make sure that we stand with south korea and that we prevent any further hostile actions from north korea. So i think that the safety of our country, of south korea, of the region are going to be, clearly, the greatest focus of yeah. [inaudible] when the president submits his budget, is he committed to pushing congress to approve sufficient funding for all American Students to have either an outstanding Public School education or the public funding for them to reach an outstanding private School Education . Look, i think the president s talked extensively about education during the primary, whether its, you know, an associates degree, a bachelors degree, ph. D. Or votechnical education that weve got to give students these days the options they need for the work force, that a votech education isome cases is whats in the interest of students in terms of their success and giving them the skills to work on cars or become a computer engineer or whatever. But as we head into, as we look towards the future, weve got to make sure that were preparing our students to have the skill set that they need. And its also the retraining aspect of that, that as people get older and Certain Industries start to turn the corner because of technology that were allowing people the opportunity for restraining to retraining to give them the skill sets they need to continue to be productive. As you will see, look, we literally will swear in the secretary of education hopefully later this evening, which we will let you all know, probably around the 5 or 6 00 hour, but thatll be something hes going to continue to have a conversation with secretary devos about. And its unfortunate we havent been able to have this conversation sooner because it was held up for so long, but i think thats something that secretary devos will be speaking a lot about, about the Education Funding and skill set and opportunities that we give not just our children, but people older in life who are looking to get back into the work force through another avenue. How about the k12 . How about the youngsters . Right. I think well have plenty of time to discuss the president s budget as we get closer as he develops that. Today were excited that secretary des so will get sworn in. Thanks a lot, guys, have a great one. Take care. Trish all right, sean spicer just wrapping up his press briefing. He does it kind of abruptly, have you noticed . All of a sudden says thats it, walks out. He did criticize democrats pretty heavily for their delay tactics and overall obstruction that he cited in washington right now while also stressing that the president is going to prevail in his executive order on immigration. Of course, were going to be listening to those oral arguments before the ninth Circuit Court of appeals in just a few hours. Theres a lot to going on. Im trish regan. Welcome, everyone, to the intelligence report. Joining me right now, Fox News Contributor and former deputy chief of star to president george w. Bush, karl rove. Let me ask you, hows the messaging going, in your view . You just saw sean spicer there with the press. There were no huge fireworks as we have sometimes seen, but overall whats your thought in terms of how theyre getting their message out . Yeah. Well, look, today was a good day for them, he had a good briefing x the democrats gave them an advantage. I think spicer is right, the democrats have made a big mistake by opposing in toto, en banc as the french would say President Trumps cabinet appointees. Better for them thats a strategy thats playing to the hard left of the Democratic Party. If they wanted to grab the voters who are up for grabs, the Americans Still trying to make up their opinion about trump, then they might have gone after a few select nominees and really made those people, you know, those nominees the issue. But instead they look like theyre opposing everybody, and it just comes off as a partisan trish just throwing darts at the wall to see what sticks, right . Yeah, yeah. Trish and after a while theres a certain amount of fatigue from the American Voters saying, okay, all theyre doing is crying all the time, and theyre not offering a solution. Yeah. Thats right. And, look, i think the administration has also benefit inside the last few days, i think it started with secretary kellys News Conference explaining the executive order. You saw spicer today at the news briefing defend it in a very appropriate way. Would that they had taken, struck that same tone and had that many advocates and allies out there explaining it rather than dumping it out at 5 45 on a friday night. They didnt even have the copy of the order for nearly two hours, didnt have anybody else able to come out and explain what was happening for almost two hours trish a little too hastily done, in your view. Way too hastily trish you heard their excuse, right, karl . They just didnt want to give anybody a heads up that this was coming other than those that were critical to the operation because they felt like, you know, it was an opportunity for people to slip in in the 11th hour. Well, fine. Fine. They should have had people working at the white house they didnt have any briefing papers on this, they didnt have anything they could hand the press that explained it. They had no group of experts standing by from within the administration to answer questions. They didnt have the secretary of homeland secretary aware of exactly whengoing out and standing by the president. If theyd had those kind of things, sure, dont go out and tell the public, oh, on Tuesday Morning at 9 00 heres what were going to do trish maybe thats a little bit of naivete, right . Hes there in the white house, hes use to doing things that he would do as chief executive, and part of his job and part of his staffs job, frankly, is to make sure that the messaging is done proposerly. Thats an example of where it got him into trouble, and now were looking to of arguments in the ninth Circuit Court of appeals. What do you anticipate is going to take from that . Im not certain theres much hope theyll uphold the add many managers position on this, but i think the administration could take it to the d. C. Circuit, court of circuit appeals and get a favorable ruling. But, you know, look, the ninth is liberal. The administration has done a good job of winning the case on the east coast. They didnt have the same opportunity to present their arguments on the west coast until today, unfortunately, theyre in front of a very unfriendly venue, in my opinion. Trish karl, what does it say about our country right now where, you know, you get a judge, a federal judge there in seattle, washington, that is not privy to any of the intelligence that our president actually has been included in on and is making this effectively decision that could result in the president potentially being stripped of one of his critical powers . Well, look, weve been through this in the bush years where we had judges who did not, as you say, have access to the same stream of intelligence. But, look, we have a constitution. That constitution has a separation of powers. It sets up the Judicial Branch which has to rule upon the constitutionality of the actions and measures of not only the president , but also the congress. And this is just the way it is in our m. And we in our system. We put in place, our founders were so concerned about power they wanted it dispersed, they wanted the powers separated between different trish checks and balances, and thats all good and thats healthy, but, but were now looking at a situation where, you know, i dont know, youve got a lot of judges right now, karl, that want to remake the world in their view from the drench as opposed to just upholding the law. Well, i get that. We had the same issue in the bush administration. Id simply say have ultimate confidence that the system will work, that youll be able to move from the district level to the appellate level, if need be, the Supreme Court level and win the argument. I dont think its healthy to be taking personal shots in the actors at this. At the end of the day, we are a nation of laws, not men, and the rule of law is paramount trish i just have 30 seconds ive been through this before. Trish sean spicer wouldnt say whether or not it would go to the Supreme Court, you heard john roberts asking him there. What do you think . If this doesnt hold with the ninth district tonight, where does it go from there . Well, it may go to the d. C. Circuit court of appeals. If the Administration Wins it, then the ball is in the oppositions court. They will appeal it up, the question is whether they go to the d. C. Circuit or straight to the Supreme Court. If it goes all the way to the Supreme Court, whoever won at the appellate level is likely to win at the Supreme Court level because we have a split court, 44, and that means that the appellate decision is kept. Trish indeed. Ive got to leave it there. Karl, never a dull moment. Exactly. Trish thank you so much. Im going to be right back. Ding so that i can take my Trading Platform wherever i go. You know that thinkorswim seamlessly syncs across all your devices, right . Oh, so my custom studies will go with me . Anywhere you want to go the markets hot sync your platform on any device with thinkorswim. Only at Td Ameritrade . Because he cares about making sure that we dont have attacks in this country, that were protected, that were ahead of the curve. I think we need to remind people the earth is a very dangerous place these days, that isis is trying to do us harm and the president s commitment is to keep us safe. Trish that is the press secretary for donald trump sean spicer insisting temporary travel ban on those seven countries is security for particular reasons. The Appeals Court in San Francisco is going to be hearing those arguments over President Trumps executive order on immigration and refugees. Trumps lawyers are making it clear its up to the president to make decisions when it comes to National Security and what noncitizen can do in terms of entering the United States. State lawyers will say this order goes too far. We expect a ruling as early as possibly tonight. The expectation is you can see this one going to the Supreme Court. Were going to take it through the system. Its very important, very important for the country, regardless of me or whoever succeeds at a later date. We have to have security in our country. The Supreme Court, you think . Well see. Hopefully it doesnt have to. Its common sense. You know, some things are law, and im all in favor of that, some things are common sense. Trish for a lot of folks it is common sense, but to those on the ninth circuit which has been known as the nutty ninth, you heard karl rove talking about reputation for going the liberal way of things. It isnt necessarily common sense, you know why . The most reverse court on the circuit. Back in 2011 admonished by the Supreme Court for exhibiting judicial disregard for sound and established principles of law. Yikes joining me is jordan secula for the American Center for law and justice. Good to have you here. Thanks. Thats not a great thing to be cited for when you are a court of law. Tell us more about the ninth circuit. The ninth circuit represents a liberal part of the country, especially the big states there like california, Like Washington state, like oregon, and hawaii. Its a large circuit, but as you said, it is results oriented instead of law oriented. Thats what the Supreme Court admonished it for. The idea of the living constitution so the judges are known for the most part of how do we get to the result we want with the facts and the law in front of us, instead of saying lets just analyze is this constitutional is what was done legal . Whether we like it or not. Thats the role of the courts. Most Circuit Courts are the courts of last resort. When you get to an issue of a president s executive order, trish. Obviously, this could be on a much faster pace to the United States Supreme Court even on the issue of the temporary restraining order. And were only looking at the restraining order and the district judge, there was like no legal analysis whatsoever on how they would be suffering irreparable injury in the state of washington. By the way, i would just say, look, there are economic consequences for sure, to a terrorist attack. Dont tell me there werent consequences to 9 11. Obviously, significantly from a personal level but economic as well. I dont get that argument. I dont get the argument that it hasnt happened before, you cant cite this, because to me thats part of the problem with government, overall. Theyre reactive as opposed to being preemptive. We should be out in front when it comes to terror, jordan. Yeah, trish, the law is very clear. It gives the president this power. Thats whats unfortunate that this is in the ninth circuit honestly because the immigration nationality act says the president , whenever it feels like a group of people, an actual class, is going to be detrimental to our countrys security, you can ban them. Trish thats the law you are citing that gives the president this power. In conflict is the 1965 act which basically says you cant discriminate against religion. He would make the point and lawyers make a point, its not a religious discriminatory ban, if it were, he would say hey, all muslims, not just the seven countries. Real quickly, let me ask you about the significance of the fact were seeing judges that are trying to remake the world as they see fit as opposed to upholding the law. What happened to the legal system and does academia have a role in it. Its the law schools, in law schools you are not learning the constitution, youre learning precedent, Supreme Court cases. Of course, thats important. Youre learning what judges and justices believe about the constitution instead of going to the text. Thats why Supreme Court nominees are important but so are Circuit Court nominees and district Court Nominees from the top to the bottom, and right now, were seeing the effects of judicial this is judicial activism. You cannot like this policy. This is obviously going to be litigated, executive order like this is going to go court, trish, but you didnt have to issue a temporary restraining order on the way you could have let it, let the executive order stand, and then have the case on the merits. Trish it shows what a chaotic state were in in some ways, something i imagine many on the left love are and eating up right now. Jordan, it is good to see you. Good to have your perspective. Much more on this, again, the court is hearing the oral arguments in just a couple of hours. Were back with more intel after this. Trish President Trump pretty fired up about having to take his plan to protect the country to court. State and federal lawyers are arguing over executive order temporarily halting the Refugee Program and entries from seven muslim majority countries. The ultraliberal ninth Circuit Court of appeals is set to hear the case in just over three hours, but its really a steppingstone before the whole thing heads to the Supreme Court. The expectation is that is where this case is going to wind up. Joining me republican strategist Mercedes Schlapp and democratic strategist Jessica Tarlov to talk about the politics of all this. I like to think that a judge is working aggressively to uphold the law as we heard from our last guest, mercedes. Unfortunately a lot of judges, especially those on the left coast are not working to uphold the law but are solving for the equation, the kind of world that they want. So this may be influenced by this judges political views. It may be influenced by his view of how he wants to see the world. How does it affect people who might be on the margin right now that are unsure of trump . Does it actually make them feel as though they want to support the president more because the president should be in charge or are they starting to get nervous . Whats the political ramifications. The judicial activist is a hot topic for republicans for the most part. When you looked at campaign, it was one of the top issues in terms of republicans supporting a donald trump over a Hillary Clinton because what we have seen through the obama years where he appointed over 300 judges is the fact of the courts moving more towards the left. The idea that you can bring on personal and policy considerations into your opinions when youre writing up opinions, being a judge. Of course we know judicial activism undermines american constitution, and so i think when you look at the ninth Circuit Court of appeals, its problematic for donald trump and the executive order. They are known for siding or being sympathetic towards the plaintiff or more so on that case on an immigration case, so i think it represents a very big problem, which is why you will likely see this case going to the Supreme Court, which brings up the other question, the fact that you have this open seat and judge gorsuch, and it really plays into the drama that youre going to see in congress during this confirmation hearing. Trish for sure, and lots of questions if the court is evenly split down the middle. What happens then . Jessica, politics aside for a second. I will try. Trish this is not good for our country. I think that, you know, many people are concerned about sort of the state that were in. As karl rove said, take a deep breath, this is just part of the process, everything will work out fine. The fact that were in this environment right now, and theres a court that has a history of trying to, as you said, remake the world from the bench, thats not good. Well, we have to also acknowledge the fact we have three separate branches of government and supposed to be checks on each other. This is what the judiciary is supposed to do. Im not a lawyer, i cant speak to the constitutionality or not. Well see what the Appeals Court says there. What seems to me and i find disturbing is its as if donald trump doesnt understand what the judiciary is supposed to do here. Sean spicer said its very clear he respects the judiciary. When you call an appointee a judge, george bush appointed, and blame him for attacks may transpire that hes making us less safe by making this ruling, is incredibly disturbing on the part of the president. Not at all. Not at all, jessica. Trish last word to mercedes. The reason being is when you look at the merits of this case, judge robart from seattle, i mean, you have legal experts questioning the fact that he went too broad. The fact that he didnt use precedent when describing the case in his briefing. It was problematic and questionable, which is why the word i would have used is activist judge, i wouldnt have used socalled. Activist and perhaps thats what he meant, twitter is pause before he tweets. Trish activist is a problem, and thats scary to me. Both sides of the aisle. Trish thank you, taking a quick break, be right back. As a control enthusiast, im allbusiness when i travel. Even when i travel. For leisure. So i go national, where i can choose any available upgrade in the aisle without starting any conversations or paying any upcharges. What can i say . Control suits me. Go national. Go like a pro. I hope hes not there for four years. I hope that, you know, this man and who he is, what hes done, the way that hes defined himself, the way hes acting, i am hoping that were able to reveal all of this, and my greatest desire is to lead him right into impeachment. I have not called for the impeachment yet. Hes doing it himself. Eventually, weve got to do something about him. We cannot continue to have a president whos acting in this manner. It is dangerous to the United States of america. Trish all right, that was california democrat Maxine Waters discussing her intent to impeach President Trump. Hes only been in office three weeks and shes already talking impeachment. Why is the left so anxious to cry foul here . Even the courts are trying to strip away power from the president. Chicago mayor, former chief of staff rahm emanuel says fellow democrats need to take a chill pill. Watch. It took us a long time to get this low. It aint going to happen in 2018. Take a chill pill, man, you got to be in this for a long haul. If you think its a quick turnaround like that. Its not. Trish joining me is the author of big agenda, trumps plan to save america, author david horowitz. Good to have you here. Do the democrats, if they have hopes of succeeding Going Forward need to do what rahm emanuel, by the way, rahm emanuel is telling them chill out . Hes exactly right, but the Democratic Party declared war on the Trump White House even before they got in office. In my book, big agenda, i describe a seminal moment in the campaign which took place in the second debate when trump turned to the camera and said you have to understand that hillary has tremendous hatred in her heart, and what he was referring to was the basket of deplorables which democrats, thats where they deposit republicans, calling us, seeing us as racist, sexist, homophobs, and, of course, they are a party consumed by hate. Moving to the left, marching off the cliff basically. Trish we saw you are right with betsy devos, a lack of tolerance, unwillingness to keep an open mind about things. We continue already cost them. Is it going to cost them in the future . Hes looking ahead to 2018 there. Theyre going to go down bigtime in the future if they continue on this path. They hate betsy devos because her life has been dedicated to championing poor, black and hispanic kids in the inner cities who suffer from and are oppressed by democrat policies. A chapter of my book big agenda is called the achilles heel of the Democratic Party which is the monopoly control of inner cities. Theyve controlled all the major inner cities in america for 50 to 100 years. All the killing fields, chicago, detroit, st. Louis, baltimore, all 100 controlled by the Democratic Party as are the Public Schools there, which have failed. They accuse betsy devos of destroying the Public Schools. Theyre destroyed. 40 of innercity kids never graduate. 40 of those who do year in and year out are functionally illiterate. And her voucher, her support for vouchers is their way out. Hypocrisy of democrats is send their own kids to private schools expensively. Trish why is that a way out . If you give a kid a choice, his parents or her parent ace choice to go to a better school, my guess is theyre going to take it. Theres a way out of poverty, and a way out of dependence on the Democratic Party . Well, exactly. It will destroy the Teacher Unions, which is the heart and soul of the Democratic Party. 25 of the delegates of their National Conventions are Teacher Union members, slush funds, campaign workers. Theyre all in the Teacher Unions. And when you have private schools and religious schools which the vouchers should apply to, thats going to break the back of the Democratic Party. Trish well, david, it looks like instructions is beginning because she is now officially the secretary of education. Its happening. They can kick and scream all they want, and the world keeps marching by. David horowitz, it is great to have you here, congratulations on the book. Were going to take a quick break. Well be right back. Hink about selling some of it. My dad gave me those shares, you know . He ran that company. I get it. But you know i think you own too much. Gotta manage your risk. And youve gotta switch to decaf. An honest opinion, even if you disagree. With 14,000 Financial Advisors its how edward jones makes sense of investing. Some things are simply impossible to ignore. The strikingly designed lexus nx turbo and hybrid. The suv that dares to go beyond utility. Experience amazing. Wont replace the full value of your totaled new car. The guy says you picked the wrong insurance plan. No, i picked the wrong insurance company. With Liberty Mutual new car replacement™, you wont have to worry about replacing your car because youll get the full value back including depreciation. And if you have more than one Liberty Mutual policy, you qualify for a multipolicy discount, saving you money on your car and home coverage. Call for a free quote today. Liberty stands with you™. Liberty mutual insurance. Trish the Trump Administration publishing a list of 78 global terror incidents, which the white house feels were underreported by the Mainstream Media after President Trump blasted the press during a speech at Macdill Air Force base, watch him here. Radical islamic terrorists are determined to strike our homeland as they did on 9 11, as they did from boston to orlando to San Bernardino and all across europe. Youve seen what happened in paris and nice. All over europe its happening. Its gotten to a point where its not even being reported and in many cases the very, very Dishonest Press doesnt want to report it. Trish is he right . Ying the threat of terrorism . Joining me dan gainer from the Media Research center. Dan says yes, why . Well, i didnt help make the list, if i had, i would have pointed out, the media wanted to cover terrorism correctly, theyd have to expand evening news programs. There are hundreds of People Killed every month around the world, many killed as a result of radical islam, and just they wanted to cover whats going on in israel, they have to cover it more. They dont, and part of it is their western bias. Theyve got the same problem in the United States flyover country. If it doesnt happen in places they care about, they dont cover it. Trish i hear you, weve done a lot of reporting on the european attacks specifically on this show because its important to us and something we think our viewers care about and need to been, but the reality is, you know, its overseas, and theres an element within the American Media that says unless its happening right under our noses, it doesnt take on the same kind of importance. I would argue that france, brussels, these situations were different, but just some of the horrible stabbings that weve seen overseas, rapes weve seen overseas, that can be attributed to islamic extremists havent gotten the same kind of attention. Do you think this is nuanced. Rather than say heres 78 instances which you didnt report all the things, maybe its a general mindset, aside from the fact that some of these are overseas. I look at San Bernardino or orlando, dan, there were media members that didnt want to admit it was terrorism. It was just a crazy guy. Yeah, media covered terrorism a lot. Thats part of the pushback here. They think they do this. But theyre pc about it, when you look, they go out of their way to avoid the term terrorism. We did a study 5 to 1. You use other terms than terror or terrorists. Trish theyre reluctant for sure. By the way, the president at that time, president obama was also reluctant. So you know, you can see the two go hand in hand. Dan, i apologize. Sean spicer is taking up all our time on this show so its good to see you, were short on time. Got to leave it there. Thank you, sir. Well be right back. Me to reach my goals. Use whe so i liked when my doctor told me i may reach my blood sugar and a1c goals by activating whats within me with onceweekly trulicity. Trulicity is not insulin. It helps activate my body to do what its supposed to do release its own insulin. Trulicity responds when my blood sugar rises. I take it once a week, and it works 24 7. It comes in an easytouse pen and i may even lose a little weight. Trulicity is a onceweekly injectable prescription medicine to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. Trulicity is not insulin. It should not be the first medicine to treat diabetes or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. Do not take trulicity if you or a Family Member has had medullary thyroid cancer, if youve had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to trulicity. Stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms such as itching, rash, or trouble breathing; a lump or swelling in your neck; or severe pain in your stomach area. Serious side effects may include pancreatitis, which can be fatal. Taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your risk for low blood sugar. Common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite and indigestion. Some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may make existing kidney problems worse. With trulicity, i click to activate whats within me. If you want help improving your a1c and blood sugar numbers with a noninsulin option click to activate your within. Ask your doctor about onceweekly trulicity. Trish all right, less than three hours away from the ninth Circuit Court of appeals hearing the oral arguments in the challenge to President Trumps executive order on immigration. Should be interesting. How do you think the courts going to rule . Id like to know what you think, head to my facebook show page liz, over to you. Liz look at this we are within nine points of an alltime record high for the dow jones industrials. Were watching it, nasdaq is on pace. Dow nearly there. Epic court battles, historic cabinet vote, a spear launched at the pharma industry. Did you hear that right during sean spicers press briefing. News flying out of the white house fast and furious at this hour. President trump is expected to meet with secretary of state Rex Tillerson at the white house, that discussion surely to swirl around the court fight tonight whether the president s travel ban involving the seven