For a variety of combinations of units, unit configurations to satisfy the legislation on the code, we pushed the number of twobedrooms and threebedrooms above the 40 percent minimum. And if you are to count the one bedrooms plus dens that we are also providing which is a new unit type we were able to provide by eliminating a substantial number of studios while maintaining the total unit count, we would be at a45 percent of our total units that would have twos and threes. The team is committed and we have repeatedly shared this as part of our outreach to ensuring that the housing that we are delivering is completely accessible. We recognize that the district is a very diverse district. Its a multilingual district. And in recognition of that have committed to posting workshops leading up the one year leading up to the opening of the building, every month, to assist with local residents who would like to enroll and apply in the bmr program to have their applications interpreted and trans
Tenant. We are going to fulfill whatever agreement we did with the tenant. We are not thinking of doing any unlawful things. I dont think there is a landlordtenant situation. This is a situation where we want to work with the city to be granted permits to enhance the property. We have been following all the guidelines and all the rules and regulations. We know that we can have an access into the property. Because all the homes in this district are available to add one extra dwelling to the property per ordinance 1917 and this puts San Francisco in compliance with californias state law. So we made some changes on the plan. They addressed that we were missing something on the lower level. We corrected that. We think that we are in compliance with all the rules and regulations to expand the property and make a good property. We even when we paint the property we tried to match to the opera house that is like two blocks away. You have pictures. I think the property looks beautiful now comp
Perspective what the neighborhood would look like. The actual package should have the materials on the elevation drawings and there should be a rendering in there as well from the corner of 45th. We supplemented the visual with an additional rendering of the building looking back from 45th avenue towards the north. That is the only one. The main rendering from the corner of 45th and judah. Commissioner johnson. I live in a sister neighborhood of this project in the richmond, and in the richmond we have Single Family homes, we have two to four story buildings, we have multifamily units and we have huge buildings, particularly on the outer sunset side close to the ocean. Around the 1980s there was a shift to down zone different parts of the city including this neighborhood. I think one of the folks who came to speak in favor of the project shared that. For so many of us living in multifamily buildings or want to live in other neighborhoods there is limited supply. The only buildings left
In policy making, but i think the more consistent we can be i think it makes sense to maintain that threshold while also considering a lower fee for the set of projects that i hear theres a lot of concern about. Im going to reverse here. I would move that we continue until there is more data. Commissioners, today, obviously, we are hearing this on the eve of the full Board Hearing this item. Ways you can take a look at it is, you can provide direction in terms of recommendations specifically to the board of supervisors for tomorrow. The next thing is to make some recommendations on the record for the future. Again, as i think courtney has said, there has been some consideration. There has been some conversation about looking at the smallcap. I recommend not using the term smallcap because it would be confusing. You should just call a 50,000 or whatever. I would also prop m tells us how much office space we can build every year. It is very easy to now come over of Office Projects will b
Preservation staff and the existing building was determined not to be a historic resource. The replacement building will contain two modest sized 1200 square foot flats with a two car tandem garage. The building will extend to the 45 per the project sponsor brief, the Property Owners originally investigated modifying the existing buildings but found that option to be unfeasible. Currently the home is tenant occupied and there is no history of evictions at this site as reported by the rent board. Department received greek Public Comments after the commission packets were distributed and one letter is from a neighbor who is opposed to the project because it removes naturally Affordable Housing stock. The other letters are from adjacent neighbors who are concerned about the mapping of the threestory building and loss of light and air. I would like to read a correction into the record. Page six of the draft motion contains an error. It refers to the new building as owneroccupied. Both unit