Striking Down Roe News Today

our second hour of "chris jansing reports. lets get right to it. >> at this hour, the new information we learned from the first court appearance of the suspected leaker of a trove of classified documents, and the reaction from capitol hill former president trump trying once again to get courts to block key testimony from his vice president, mike pence what that means for the federal january 6th probe. a downpour of historic proportions, south florida flooded after being slammed with ...

long-range missiles toward the ukrainian capital of kyiv. well have the very latest on the ongoing fight and where global leaders stand on the issue. e global leaders stand on the issue. good morning. and welcome to "way too early." on this monday, june 27th. im jonathan lemire, coming to you live from the beautiful bavarian house. we will get back to the g-7 in a moment but we start with the supreme court landmark decision to overturn roe v. wade ending the constitutional right to a...

And so i think hes lost any control of this court even though its named for him and historically will be remembered as the roberts court. he is not in control of his own conservative faction. they dont need his vote anymore. so i think on style, these republican justices are not paying attention to the courts reputation anymore. theyre routinely appearing at political functions. the last three trump appointees to the court all went and appeared and kissed the ring of mitch mcconnell down in kent...

What's really at stake in the Supreme Court's Mississippi abortion case? Christian Post reporter Ryan Foley breaks down the details behind the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization legal battle, and reveals what could happen when the high court unveils its ruling next year. From throwing out Roe entirely to leaving it in place without additional restrictions, there's quite a lot that could take place. Foley offers a quick, helpful and concise explainer.

>> it absolutely could. as kim says, theyd go right a frontal assault. roe v. wade, bankrupt 50 years, get rid of it, get rid of it. they certainly could do that. they also could uphold the statute, which would be like striking down roe but make it sound as if theyre just weakening it rather than completely eliminating it. >> kim, roe has been the law of the land since 1973. can you take a step back and talk about what this would mean for the lives of women in many states that would move quickly...

As kim said, they would have a frontal assault, get rid of it, get rid of it. so they could do that. they also could uphold the statute, which would be like striking down roe, but make it found as if theyre just weakening it, rather than completely eliminating it. >> kim, roe has been the law of the land since 1973. can you take a step back and talk about what this would mean for the lives of women in many states that would move quickly to put in, you know, place similar bans, and could a state ...