writings: Live & Latest News Updates : Vimarsana.com
and arson experts. people do this to themselves but the point here is the person traveled from florida all the way to the trump trial. this is not connected to trump, it has really nothing to do with him. i read all his writings he posted. it's nonsensical, as yasmin clearly reported. it doesn't make sense. he named every politician, every hollywood person, every billionaire, every person on the news, every name he can think of. he tied them all together in some crackpot conspiracy theory. he's a disturbed person. it doesn't make any sense. i think the good part of that, though, is hopefully the judge will take a look at that, to reassure his jurors that this was not directed at the trial, at mr. trump, at them, at the court family. i hope he takes the time to do that. i would even say, you know, to the judge, consider letting the jurors read his rantings which are only a couple pages. once you read it, you will be
of the article 2 interests -- >> the balancing of marbury and to the extent that the court is reaching policy considerations of the court those are decisively outweighed by the sort of the republic shattering consequences of subjecting chief executives in an endless cycle to prosecution once they leave office. the founders were very much against that and deeply concerned with that, and you can see it in hamilton's writings in federalists 67, 68, and 69, and you can see that in the other writings of the meaning of the constitution. >> do you think that we should -- it occurred to me. do you think that we should take any cognizance of the fact that when they wrote that george washington was the president, and albeit a very, very strong executive that congress was
brand-new and everything else was brand-new and things have balanced out. we have a strong congress, and we have a strong judiciary and we have a strong president. >> i think that if you are looking at the writings of the founders they were definitely looking past the presidency of george washington an iconic figure and looking past the presidency of george washington and future of presidencies and correctly anticipated that the nation might, and deeply concerned about that the nation would devolve into factions, and factions that did not govern the presidency of george washington because of the moral authority, but when you got to adams and jefferson, they evolved into factions that were deliberately looking past that presidency to the republic that stood for over 200 years and just in the last year that was shattered by the presidency of president trump, and if the court has no further questions, i would ask the court to reverse and if you rule against us, we ask you to stay
reaches the balancing of policy considerations, those are decisively outweighed by the sort of republic shattering consequences of subjecting our chief executives in an endless cycle to prosecution once they leave office. the founders were very much against that, they were deeply concerned with that, you see that in hamilton's writings in federal 65, 69 and 77, and in federalist 47, and that is the original meaning of the constitution. >> i think we should -- it just occurred to me, do you think we should take any cognizance of the fact that when they wrote that, george washington was the president? very, very strong executive, the congress was brand-new, the -- everything else was brand-new.
and things have balanced out. we have got a strong congress. we have got a strong judiciary. and we have got a strong president. >> i think that if you look at the writings, the founders, they were looking past the presidency of george washington, an iconic figure, looking past the presidency of george washington, to the future presidencies and correctly anticipated the nation might -- deeply concerned about the nation would devolve into factions, factionalism did not govern the presidency of george washington because of his moral authority. however, immediately when you got to adams and jefferson, you devolved into factions. they correctly anticipated and were looking past that presidency to the future of the republic, a tradition that stood for 234 years until last year when it was shattered by the indictment of president trump. if the court has no further questions, we could ask the court to reverse and if the court rules against us in any respect, we renew our request to the court, stay as mandate to allow us to seek further review
agenda? some of the people gates stole from or black. she stole from carol and carol swanswing does not get the kindf coverage that gay does. and yet gay is stealing for her writings and so forth. she is not the only minority that gay stole from. how come jake tapper, al sharpton, how come joe scarborough how come no one are coming to the defense of people who had the intellectual property stolen from them? and then used as a lie to create an effect claudine gay's so-called scholarship. >> two reasons one, the great black scholar former professor at princeton and vanderbilt is a conservative. she believes in colorblind up polity she opposes affirmative action. and so among left wing scholars both black and white carol is an app a state she is a defector from the ideology.
agenda? some of the people gates stole from or black. she stole from carol and carol swank doswing does not get the f coverage that gay does. and yet gay is stealing for her writings and so forth. she is not the only minority that gay stole from. how come jake tapper, al sharpton, how come joe scarborough how come no one are coming to the defense of people who had the intellectual property stolen from them? and then used as a lie to create an effect claudine gay's so-called scholarship. >> two reasons one, the great black scholar former professor at princeton and vanderbilt is a conservative. she believes in colorblind up polity she opposes affirmative action. and so among left wing scholars both black and white carol is an app a state she is a defector from the ideology.
agenda? some of the people gates stole from or black. she stole from carol and carol swank doswing does not get the f coverage that gay does. and yet gay is stealing for her writings and so forth. she is not the only minority that gay stole from. how come jake tapper, al sharpton, how come joe scarborough how come no one are coming to the defense of people who had the intellectual property stolen from them? and then used as a lie to create an effect claudine gay's so-called scholarship. >> two reasons one, the great black scholar former professor at princeton and vanderbilt is a conservative. she believes in colorblind up polity she opposes affirmative action. and so among left wing scholars both black and white carol is an app a state she is a defector from the ideology.
and you have to keep trump on the ballot. do you think the fight is over because you're seeing a willingness and commit want to this from for example the secretary of state and colorado state fighting donald trump. is that the end of the fight if they side with donald trump? >> you'd hope so and i don't put it past jenna griswald or any democrats in colorado or across the nation to respect the rule of law. we're not going to take it lying down no matter what, we're going to ensure that our voter haves the right to vote for donald trump and if the supreme court decides with us, great. if they don't, we're not going to take it lying down. pete: real quick, we don't get to talk to state party chairs often and the iowa caucuses coming umm quick in new hampshire and what's your sense of how the primaries play out? >> yeah, the writings is on the wall and donald trump is going to win in iowa and he's going to win in new hampshire and by february, we'll have clarity on