Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
the ag's office is saying, no, it's not, for a few reasons. one, this isn't a company that's licensed to do business in the state of new york. two, they've never issued a surety bond in new york. they haven't even issued a surety bond anywhere for the last two years. three, and perhaps most importantly, when you look at the financials of this company, the difference between their assets and their liabilities is not enough to cover the bond. that coupled with the fact that they don't have control right now of the $175 million but, rather, would have to let charles schwab, which holds the account that's collateral, know they want to exert control, then it'd take at least two plus days to do that, that has the attorney general concerned that, essentially, trump could run rough with this money and nobody who has enough to cover the bond would be left holding the bag. mika, i am very much interested in what happens at that hearing today, even as i'll be in the courthouse watching opening