Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
clinton _ was nicolas sarkozy, so was hillary clinton. , ., , , ., ., clinton. the problem is that we now have effectively _ clinton. the problem is that we now have effectively no _ clinton. the problem is that we now have effectively no state _ clinton. the problem is that we now have effectively no state there, - clinton. the problem is that we now have effectively no state there, no i have effectively no state there, no government, we have competing factions, we have word lords in the shape of people like khalifa haftar. we have different countries, state sponsors of armaments to the different factions. and it is a total mess. and through all of that, many refugees coming from sub—saharan africa are going through libya instead of staying in libya to help rebuild that state. and they are crossing the mediterranean into italy and into europe. surely, there must�*ve some of that the consequence of that intervention? must've some of that the consequence of that intervention?— of that intervention? would you auree? of that intervention? would you agree? what — of that intervention? would you agree? what i _ of that intervention? would you agree? what i would _ of that intervention? would you agree? what i would agree - of that intervention? would you agree? what i would agree with of that intervention? would you i agree? what i would agree with is that at— agree? what i would agree with is that at the — agree? what i would agree with is that at the end of the intervention, when _ that at the end of the intervention, when we _ that at the end of the intervention, when we wanted and the french and others _ when we wanted and the french and others wanted to help the libyan factions— others wanted to help the libyan factions come together, they did not want any— factions come together, they did not want any foreign boots on the