Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vim

consensus rather than these hard and fast 6-3 rulings. when it s just the nine of them in that room. joan, as jim said, huge scoop. everyone should read the entire piece. thank you for bringing it to us. thank you. let s bring in senior political analyst john avalon to discuss all this. people say why bring in a political analyst when you re talking about the courts. because so much of breyer s calculus and concern about the state of the court is about politics, right? that speech he gave at harvard last year warning what happens when you let people view those in robes as politicians or politically influenced. yeah, but that s the reality. i mean, you know, the highest court in the land is still selected through a political prism. if there were any doubt about republicans determination to do whatever they can to seat courts, it was the result of ruth bader ginsburg deciding not