Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vim
>> and a defendant that is not showing this remorse or acceptance of responsibility can be can under the lobby sentence much higher. and now the former president has made a number of sentence, number of statements suggesting over time that he has not accepting responsibility for this. if i were the problem prosecution here, what's throw this out? it's almost in their interests to have the gag order lifted because you can almost assume that this defendant is going to keep speaking out in a manner that the judge could actually use it. sentencing and saying that this person has not accepted responsibility, is still attacking the integrity of the court, and that could jacket sentence up. so what do you want it eliot's absolutely right. >> i mean, there's a difference between what i want a judge to order my client to do and what i as an attorney would tell my client to do. i think that it is in the prosecution's best interest to allow him to speak so that they could use things as sentencing. and quite frankly, i think it's in the campaign's best interest to leave the gag order in place because he gets a lot more support from saying, hey, i'm not alone. to talk, then he would if he were allowed to say what he has to think about michael cohen.