partyiers would take over the republican party. >> well, i don't think that is a possibility at this point, but the case has to be made that we can't really underestimate the potency of the public anger out there right now, and i agree with john that, you know, independent voters are very different from these tea party folks who are really defined by certain fiscal issues, and you know, they don't want new taxes, and certainly, they don't want big government. if somebody can harness that and attract independent voters that john is talking about, and some of these angry tea party voters, then you really might have a very viable candidate. >> well, let's look back to 1992 and discuss that for a minute, and discuss the results of the 1992 elections with ross perot pulling in 18.9% of the vote and george bush getting 37.5% of the vote and bill clinton getting