>> was there nefarious behavior on the part of gadhafi and the militia inside? was there a war effort being generated from there? >> command and control was how the pentagon later described what the building may have been. it wasn't possible to see that. if you imagine a building in three parts, a center and two end parts, the end parts were relatively undamaged and the center was completely collapsed which showed me that these were precision munitions fired accurately but designed to have low collateral damage. i have seen huge craters blown in the ground before. this wasn't that type of bomb. it seemed to be more of a message but it did leave the building intact. the rest of the building didn't appear to have what i would expect from command and control which would at least be monitors of some kind. phone lines, wires, cables. there wasn't a complex array of antennas on the roof. journalists who were there present at the time had been to