one might see were not sufficient for them to worry about the credibility of the witness. so this is a very powerful indictment. and we have to wait the see what the forensic evidence is. presumably the defense is going to be one of concept, and not an alibi. >> the prosecution is saying hardened detectives question this woman, sometimes under tough questioning and they believe her story is consistent and point to the fact that she immediately went to her supervisor at the hotel and reported this. >> well, look, hardened detectives, i've yet to meet a detective, once he was invested in the case, didn't think it was the greatest case in the world. they don't just stand up and say, ah-ha, i'm going to dismiss it. in terms of the grand jury, you can count on one hand the number of grand juries that have rejected indictments on a regular basis. it just doesn't happen. anything the prosecution puts up there, the grand jury is nothing more than a rubber stamp. this is not, and i tend to agree