> well, i guess i've said that before. i'm a pro-li"> > well, i guess i've said that before. i'm a pro-li" property="og:description"> > well, i guess i've said that before. i'm a pro-li">
most erroneous -- of our time" you believe that roe v. wade was a bad decision and still believe that. >> well, i guess i've said that before. i'm a pro-life advocate. >> thank you. >> but fundamentally the problem as i see it with row versus wade is that it denies the people the right to make laws that they might feel appropriate. did the supreme court have that power? i concluded they didn't because the constitution didn't answer that question. >> well, senator sessions -- i hate to interrupt you but i have less than two minutes, so i don't want to get into the substance of roe v. wade that you believe it was a bad decision based on constitution privacy decisions. we can very well end up with a supreme court that will be very