to be part of it. and an honor. >> the fourth amendment protects the right to be free from, quote, unreasonable searches and seizures, unquote. it was written in the late 18th century when the tools used by law enforcement to investigate crime and monitor suspects were radically different than they are today. in your view, how should a judge approach interpreting and applying constitutional provisions like the fourth amendment in cases where the technologies or -- and/or methods at issue were, obviously, not even imagined by the founders? >> may i offer an example, senator, i think might be helpful? >> sure. >> i take united states versus jones. recent case from the united states supreme court involving whether police officers might attach a gps tracking device to
Related Keywords
Part , Quote , Fourth Amendment , Searches , Unquote , Honor , Seizures , Doesn T , View , Crime , Suspects , Approach , Law Enforcement , Tools , 18 , Cases , Amendment , Issue , Provisions , Methods , Founders , Technologies Or , Heller Case , Senator , The Supreme Court , Example , Us , Police Officers , Gps Tracking Device , Versus Jones ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.