> no, i don't and the campaign doesn't eith"> > no, i don't and the campaign doesn't eith" property="og:description"> > no, i don't and the campaign doesn't eith">
fraudulent use of president obama's voice. it is a shameful indefensible tactic." do you think it's a fair ad? >> no, i don't and the campaign doesn't either. in fact, the other ad you were just talking about earlier has been disavowed by karen handel. she wasn't asked about the eleventh district chairman's comments. these are all inappropriate things to do. one of the things key to remember here is there is going to be close to $50 million being spent on this election. the airwaves have been blanketed with millions of dollars of television. the other ad you talked about and this one are hardly pinpricks in terms of how big their buys are. i don't even -- the other add got $12,000 behind us and cost $600,000 a week to run an ad in atlanta on tv. these are things floating around twitter and the internet but not having an impact on this race. clearly that's an inappropriate thing to do. she doesn't need it.