before getting coverage. this is not like the individual mandate on some level, which is you want young healthier people to be incentivized to get into the marketplace making it work better and spreads out the risk pool in general and hopefully drives costs down a little. what they're trying to do here is essentially incentivize people who would want insurance for long periods of time to get back into the marketplace as quickly as possible to avoid that six-month penalty here. this isn't the individual mandate. it's a watered down version of a mandate but necessary for the health of the marketplace. the big question now is does this sway any votes? that's not what this change was for. this is a change actually that senate staff has been working on a couple weeks trying to make sure it's compliant with the reconciliation with the budget rules in the senate and, again, it would actually put through the lens of the cbo score likely help their coverage numbers. if you look back, woman, at the house version. 23 million over the course of ten years, fewer would vin insurance based on that house measure. the idea, if you include this