look, both have points that are accurate here, but jimmy kimmel is probably more on the side of right here. again, nuance is important and there are specific designs in this bill. as i noted, state flexibility is something that republicans, conservatives have been pushing very hard. it's the kind of essential idea behind changing the subsidies structure spiral, sending block grants to the states and letting states design their own systems. but in that flexibility becomes a reduction of the regulations. the regulations that make sure guaranteed cams are there, that make sure price protections are maintained and on the idea of more people being covered, don, the way this bill is drafted, the way these block grants will go out, the way medicaid will change from an open-ended sbietment, the spending will go down. if spending goes down, states are going to have to make very difficult decisions about coverage. the idea that there will be more people covered under this bill as it's currently drafted because of the spending, it doesn't ring true when you talk to analysts and you talk to a lot of senators. it's not just democrats that have problems with this.