his door and interviewed him, but they could not have taken any steps based on what we know now to take the weapon away. >> no criminal record. >> he had no criminal record. we understand from the fbi that they undertook a series of database checks. what that means is they looked at their own systems, their own internal databases. his name would not have turned up unless he had prior contact with law enforcement, prior contact with the fbi. if he didn't, he wouldn't have been in those databases. >> local law enforcement as well called to the house any number of times. at what point does that bubble up as something that is actionable? >> all those things are questions we should be learning in this after action report. was the right information shared with local law enforcement. as i said, was there contact with youtube? was there sufficient information to meet the legal threshold to get further information about his identity? >> lisa monica, tluch. let's treat this as a how many
Related Keywords
Weapon , Fbi , Door , Criminal Record , Series , He Wouldn T , Name , Law Enforcement , Contact , Databases , Database Checks , Systems , Something , Things , Information , Number , Times , Questions , Learning , Point , House , Action Report , Youtube , Identity , Threshold , Lisa Monica , Tluch ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.