redactions would not come in the form of just protecting sources and methods, that there would be a political motivation behind it. we don't know exactly what he's talking about yet. he is going to be a guest tomorrow on "state of the union." but this would be a serious charge by the ranking member on the house intelligence committee. >> it is a very serious charge. and of course, when the nunes memo first came out, the problem that i think a lot of people had was this was the intelligence committee was really a bipartisan committee that respected secrecy and worked together to preserve the nation's secrets. and for one side in this case the republicans, to say no, we're going to release our version of what happened, angered the democrats tremend s tremendously. now you have the committee at war with itself, separately leaking separate parts of the document. it's not a great way to protect the nation's secrets. it really isn't. >> to that point, sam, when you had this back and forth between the two memos, is it hard to