non-disclosure agreement isn't valid because the lawyer for mr. trump, mr. cohen, signed it on behalf of mr. trump. is that a valid issue or is this a risky move by ms. clifford and her lawyer? >> that is the crux of the issue here, was the settlement agreement entered into between michael cohen, stormy daniels, signed by both of them but not signed by donald trump, is that agreement valid. and stormy daniels' lawyers are taking the position that the absence of trump's signature makes that agreement null and void. and that is what they went into court, they filed an action in court asking the court to basically issue an order saying that they wouere no longer boun by the agreement and essentially saying that the arbitration that was triggered by mr. cohen in fact also isn't valid because of the lack of signature. now, trump's lawyers are claiming that the liquidated damages clause in that non-disclosure agreement which pretty much obligated theory pay