subject kind of scoped. if he encounters something that's beyond the scope, he doesn't just shrug his shoulders and walk away. what if he discovers a human trafficking ring or pornography? does he say, oh, that's beyond my scope, carry on! no. the department of justice is required by law to investigate any evidence of criminal activity. so it will be passed on, as it was in this case. what this tells me is that rosenstein is actually taking his oversight responsibilities very seriously. he's not allowing mueller to continue something that might be very far outside his scope, not letting him cross that red line. instead he is allowing the regular prosecutors in the appropriate offices of the department of justice go along with this. and again, in this case it's a u.s. attorney that was interviewed by trump himself. so, again, as i mentioned before, he will be disappointed if he believes that getting rid of mueller or rosenstein or sessions is in any way going to