evidence or was unwilling to turn over information that he had been subpoenaed or would be subpoenaed to get, must have been overwhelming because i can't imagine so sensitive an order. >> you're right. the idea here is that you have to have the first threshold of probable cause and reason to believe there is evidence of a crime ongoing in the past in the locations you are telling the judge they are in. that's the first -- for every person in the united states of america. the second is now it is an attorney who will have privileged information. that doesn't have an absolute definition here. privilege has to still meet the requirements. it has to be between the attorney and client and about legal advice, it couldn't be in furtherance of a crime otherwise the privilege does not apply. so you have to meet a couple of thresholds and now the president's personal attorney who last week said talk to my attorney on air force one and told the people to do that. all of the bars were met in different degrees, all by people who are republican on the same team as the president of the