campaign statements would play big in oral arguments. >> kate, i think they did play a factor with those justices who agree that this particular ban is discriminatory, but unfrnly, there are enough justices to strike down this ban, one thing about the travel ban 3.0 and it wasn't the first one and it's been given type, it's given the opportunity to at least develop some evidence that this was done for national security reasons and we reached out to certain countries and they haven't adequately told us they're doing what they should do as far as back ground checks. so at least they have a reason for it, so i think based on the fact that the supreme court let the ban go into effect earlier this year and based on the arguments we heard today, there's simply not enough justices to strike down this watered down ban, but i think